On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Adam Schreiber wrote: >> I would hope that and in the future a mapping mirror. The database >> ought to move to being on more than one server. > > I am interested to hear your proposals on conflict resolution, or > failing that, segmentation of our data.
What about a segmentation in time? During the time of day when most edits are being made from one part of the globe, make the server located there the read-write master, and the other(s) the read-only slave(s). On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > I have spent some time thinking about this but I always end up with > "let's make distributed mirrors for reading but keep write accesses on > the central server to avoid trouble". Yeah, I don't think you gain much by having multiple masters physically separated by large distances. It's probably not worth it. But it'd be fun to implement if you had to :). _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us