Re: [Talk-br] HOTOSM Tasking Manager - Barragem em Brumadinho

O projeto provavelmente será feito em breve, então, se pudermos obter a documentação sobre a licença, poderemos usá-lo para revisar depois. On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 18:45, Alexandre Oliveira wrote: > Para armazenar as imagens, seria necessário somente um servidor, ou > teria que fazer alguma

Re: [OSM-talk] Looking for phot of mapping mappers

On 22/1/19 14:57, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > I am looking for a good photo of mappers mapping during survey. It turns > to be surprisingly hard. > > Can someone share/link one? You can find some photos from the Mapanica team activities here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/xamanu/albums/ and

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import update

Bonjour John La géométrie des bâtiments est un sujet qui préoccupe plusieurs contributeurs en particulier pour les imports de données. Dans un tel cas, il est difficile de revenir en arrière et il est préférable de bien planifier, analyser.  Comme on le voit avec l'import en Ontario, on observe

Re: [talk-ph] Request for clarification on road tagging guidelines

The segment in question should be `primary_link`, following the attributes of the higher highway. On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:44 AM grab osm wrote: > Apologize Erwin. > > Here are the further details of our question. > > When a way segment that connects to a Major road, please suggest if the >

Re: [talk-ph] Request for clarification on road tagging guidelines

Apologize Erwin. Here are the further details of our question. When a way segment that connects to a Major road, please suggest if the the connector should have same classification as the way segment or that of a Major Road with link attribute assigned Below is an example: [image: image]

Re: [talk-ph] Request for clarification on road tagging guidelines

I think it's bad form to just post a ticket link here, without actually specifying your question. If you post something here, expect answers to be answered here as well. Your ticket tracking system is your own, not the community's. On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:23 AM grab osm via talk-ph <

[talk-ph] Request for clarification on road tagging guidelines

Good Morning Everyone, Request a quick clarification on road tagging guidelines. We have created an issue in our github page and here is the link. https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/30 Kindly take time to review and suggest Thanks Lavanya ___

Re: [OSM-talk] junction=yes

Thank you for the good information, Johnparis. Apparently, the wiki for junction=yes has now been modified for clarity.-Original Message- From: Johnparis Sent: Jan 27, 2019 2:48 AM To: Talk Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] junction=yes It's pretty clear that the intention of this tag is only for

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

Hi Colin, Dependent and doubly dependent localities are technical terms and without having access to PAF most mappers wouldn't know which one to use. And if they did, that could be considered a copyright infringement. Also, it just doesn't sound right. No one asks "which dependent locality do

Re: [Talk-de] Overpass Abfrage

Hab da noch eine Frage: Versuche eine Relation über (area:XYZ) mit dem 36 Vorwahl zu ergreifen. Leider funktioniert das i-wie nicht. Es geht um die ID 4168993. Gruß Martin Am 28.01.2019 um 00:15 schrieb Christoph Grenz: > Hallo Martin, > > du bekommst dem Mittelpunkt bei POIs mit "out

Re: [Talk-de] Overpass Abfrage

Hi, > Am 28.01.2019 um 00:15 schrieb Christoph Grenz: > > [out:csv(::lat, ::lon, name)]; Was ich mich schon lange frage bzw. wünsche ist, dass auch bei anderen Output-Formaten als CSV (also den out settings xml,json,custom,popup) die Rückgabe-Attribute eingeschränkt werden könnten. Also z.B. so

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

Perhaps OSM UK could step in and endorse address tagging practices once a consensus is reached? In the end it does not matter what tag names we use as long as the whole scheme is consistent and rich enough to describe common use cases. So far, I see addr:city=posttown is a popular solution,

Re: [Talk-de] Overpass Abfrage

Hallo Christoph, super danke für deine Antwort ;-) Am 28.01.2019 um 00:15 schrieb Christoph Grenz: > [out:csv(::lat, ::lon, name)]; > ( > node[amenity=nursing_home]({{bbox}}); > way[amenity=nursing_home]({{bbox}}); > relation[type=multipolygon][amenity=nursing_home]({{bbox}});

Re: [Talk-de] Overpass Abfrage

Hallo Martin, du bekommst dem Mittelpunkt bei POIs mit "out center" und die Ausgabe Koordinaten+Name mit "[out:csv(…)];". Also z.B. so: --- [out:csv(::lat, ::lon, name)]; ( node[amenity=nursing_home]({{bbox}});

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

Hi Andrezej, I would oppose addr:village for the Dependent Locality as it invites incorrect usage. There is no reason to overload an existing tag with a different meaning to its current usage. In the UK, a village is not simply a neat subdivision of a town. I think addr:locality and

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

On 28 January 2019 06:17:04 GMT+08:00, David Woolley wrote: >On 27/01/2019 21:21, Colin Smale wrote: >> Organisation Organisation Name 60 n/a >> Department Name 60 n/a >> Premises Sub Building Name 30 > >addr:unit What about

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

David, thanks for offering some updates. By the way, I am not asking questions because I personally want the answers - I am fully aware of how these things work. And because of that, and because OSM tries to model reality, I believe we need some kind of anchor-point for our thinking in order to

[Talk-de] Overpass Abfrage

Nabend zusammen, ich hätte da mal ein Anliegen an die Overpass Kenner: Ich würde gerne ein Abfrage zu, zum Bsp. Altenheime,  starten und folgende Daten Ausgeben: Koordinaten und Name. Dabei sollen bei POI´s und Relationen der Mittelpunkt genommen werden. Kann man das i-wie als Code schreiben.

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

At low level (commercial areas, academic campuses, hospitals) that's not really the case. They are not as formalised as admin areas. Best wishes, Andrzej On 28 January 2019 05:46:23 GMT+08:00, Gareth L wrote: >I’d hope these would inherit from whatever the address is enclosed in. > >On 27 Jan

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

Hi Colin, This is broadly in line with Robert's proposals. However, it raises questions about: 1. tagging "dependent localities" - they can be towns or villages. Are you happy with addr:town, addr:village for this purpose? Reaching consensus on that would be a major step forward. 2. Tagging

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

On 27/01/2019 21:21, Colin Smale wrote: OrganisationOrganisation Name 60 n/a Department Name 60 n/a PremisesSub Building Name 30 addr:unit Building Name 50 addr:housename Building Number 4

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

I’d hope these would inherit from whatever the address is enclosed in. On 27 Jan 2019, at 21:22, Colin Smale mailto:colin.sm...@xs4all.nl>> wrote: Assuming the post code is seen in OSM as a way of addressing post (as opposed to a geographic subdivision or an indication of location) then I

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

Assuming the post code is seen in OSM as a way of addressing post (as opposed to a geographic subdivision or an indication of location) then I suggest following Royal Mail's address structure, which can be seen in the description of the Postcode Address File on Wikipedia [1]. If we cannot map a

[Talk-us] NC sidewalk data import

Hello, I'm a front end dev for a city government working on a side project to fork and add to AccessMap for North Carolina cities. In order to make this happen, I want to import North Carolina city sidewalk data into OSM. I have no prior OSM experience, so I'm

[Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

Hi, When working on post codes in East Anglia I realised the current address tagging scheme is insufficient for even fairly basic scenarios. I have already discussed the issues with some of the most experienced mappers and like to bring these issues to your attention. Robert has summarised his

Re: [Talk-GB] Dropped or lowered kerbs

Hi Andy, It somewhat depends on what you are trying to map. The kerb=* tag on the wiki page you linked to is for when mapping a crossing. As shown on the second example on the page. you would create a way that runs perpendicular to the highway at the point where a footpath (or cyclepath) crosses

Re: [Talk-br] HOTOSM Tasking Manager - Barragem em Brumadinho

Para armazenar as imagens, seria necessário somente um servidor, ou teria que fazer alguma outra coisa com elas? On 27/01/2019 08:51, Theo A wrote: > Obrigada, estamos trabalhando nisso. Sabem se essa informação está > armazenada em algum lugar? Se não conseguirmos armazená-la, o público não >

[Talk-GB] Dropped or lowered kerbs

I've been reading the wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:kerb and I'm no wiser on how to map a dropped (or "lowered") kerb. I'm looking at a road which is mapped as a single way, without separate pavements. JOSM wants to add "barrier=kerb", but that would surely imply a

[OSM-talk] Rendered boundary not present in data

Hello, I've come across a boundary rendered on both OSM Carto and the Humanitarian layer that isn't present in the OSM data: https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=47.50350=-3.13473#map=19/47.50350/-3.13473=D The correct boundary, which is present in the data, is also rendered:

Wochennotiz Nr. 444 15.01.2019–21.01.2019

Hallo, die Wochennotiz Nr. 444 mit vielen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der OpenStreetMap-Welt ist da: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2019/01/wochennotiz-nr-444/ Viel Spaß beim Lesen! ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

[talk-cz] Jizdni rady was Re: Praha zveřejnila otevřená data o MHD

Ahoj! > https://pid.cz/o-systemu/opendata/ > > Data, která lze stáhnout přímo zde z webu, jsou stejně jako celý obsah webu > opatřena licencí *CC-BY *, > tedy je lze dále šířit, avšak je nutné uvést autora a případné provedené > změny. Data, která

[Talk-us] weeklyOSM #444 2019-01-15-2019-01-21

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 444, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/11389/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import update

If you take a look at 942 Bridle Path Crescent for example whilst it isn't exactly square the deviations from 90 degrees to me are relatively minor. I assume that this is the sort of thing you are talking about?

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Bug JOSM avec gros fichiers du cadastre

Merci, j'arrive effectivement à reproduire le bug avec ce fichier. Le sam. 26 janv. 2019 à 08:01, Gautier Pelloux-Prayer via Talk-fr < talk-fr@openstreetmap.org> a écrit : > Vu la position de l'exception, il semblerait que ce soit Marseille 8eme : >

Re: [Talk-GB] Mapping Driving Test Centres

You could also add government=transportation to office=government Regards, Mike ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Mapping Driving Test Centres

You might want to add operator=DVSA. I tag them like Tony too On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 23:04, Silent Spike wrote: > Thanks Tony, as the only reply here so far I've followed your approach. > > Could be valuable in future to develop a tagging scheme for these centres > as they each do testing for

[Talk-br] semanárioOSM Nº 444 2019-01-15-2019-01-21

Bom dia, O semanárioOSM Nº 444, o resumo de tudo o que acontece no mundo OpenStreetMap, está publicado *em português*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/pb/archives/11389/ Aproveite! semanarioOSM? Quem?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Onde?:

[Talk-pt] semanárioOSM Nº 444 2019-01-15-2019-01-21

Bom dia, O semanárioOSM Nº 444, o resumo de tudo o que acontece no mundo OpenStreetMap, está publicado *em português*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/pb/archives/11389/ Aproveite! semanarioOSM? Quem?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Onde?:

[OSM-co] semanarioOSM Nº 444 2019-01-15-2019-01-21

Hola, el semanario Nº 444, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/11389/ ¡Disfruta! semanarioOSM? ¿Dónde?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages ¿Quién?:

[Talk-cl] semanarioOSM Nº 444 2019-01-15-2019-01-21

Hola, el semanario Nº 444, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/11389/ ¡Disfruta! semanarioOSM? ¿Dónde?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages ¿Quién?:

[talk-latam] semanarioOSM Nº 444 2019-01-15-2019-01-21

Hola, el semanario Nº 444, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/11389/ ¡Disfruta! semanarioOSM? ¿Dónde?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages ¿Quién?:

[Talk-ko] weeklyOSM #444 2019-01-15-2019-01-21

매주 일어나는 OSM 소식을 종합한, 444번째 주간OSM이 발행되었습니다. http://www.weeklyosm.eu/ko/archives/11389/ 읽어 주셔서 감사합니다! 주간OSM이란? 누가?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 어디서?: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3

[OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #444 2019-01-15-2019-01-21

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 444, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/11389/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

[Talk-GB] weeklyOSM #444 2019-01-15-2019-01-21

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 444, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/11389/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

[Talk-ca] weeklyOSM #444 2019-01-15-2019-01-21

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 444, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/11389/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

[Talk-africa] weeklyOSM #444 2019-01-15-2019-01-21

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 444, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/11389/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

[Talk-in] weeklyOSM #444 2019-01-15-2019-01-21

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 444, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/11389/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

[talk-ph] weeklyOSM #444 2019-01-15-2019-01-21

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 444, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/11389/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

[OSM-talk-ie] weeklyOSM #444 2019-01-15-2019-01-21

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 444, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/11389/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

Re: [Talk-br] HOTOSM Tasking Manager - Barragem em Brumadinho

Obrigada, estamos trabalhando nisso. Sabem se essa informação está armazenada em algum lugar? Se não conseguirmos armazená-la, o público não terá condições de adicionar imagens manualmente On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 23:29, Narcélio de Sá Pereira Filho < narceliosapere...@gmail.com> wrote: > Prezado

Re: [Talk-us] The San Jose / Santa Clara border

Thanks to everyone who replied - I've reverted the change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66672189 . On 27/01/2019 01:50, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: Do the latest NGS topographical maps show the city limits properly? Those are public domain On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 10:16 AM OSM

Re: [Talk-it] Perché si guadagna di più non importando cecamente i dati ufficiali

Ciao, non faccio parte di una PA ma come Alessandro ho avuto modo di interagire parecchio, facendo poi parte di un'organo centrale del CAI (che e' un'ente pubblico), un po' di pratica l'ho fatta. > La PA ha i propri regolamenti e una certa lentezza, per utilizzare uno > sfumato eufemismo :-) ,

Re: [Talk-us] The San Jose / Santa Clara border

Does anyone know someone who lives in the "disputed" area? If so, then one definitive information point is what local government elections he/she can vote in. -jack -- Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology On January 26, 2019 8:50:39 PM EST, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: >Do the latest

Re: [Talk-it] Terminiamo la traduzione del Tasking Manager 3

Il 27/01/19 10:22, Aury88 ha scritto: ho finito la traduzione dell'ultima decina di stringhe. purtroppo credo non mi sia consentito modificare le stringhe di traduzione inserite da altri. ho notato quelle che credo siano discrepanze su come vengono tradotti alcuni termini tipo "Task". molto

Re: [Talk-in] Redesigning the OSM India Logo

On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 8:23 AM Chetan H A wrote: > Hi Arun, > > The current logo very good for me. It's the same we are using in @osm_in > twitter. Thanks to Srividya for creating this. > > Chetan the logo is good, and thanks to Srividya for taking the initiative to make it. Brought it up

Re: [Talk-it] Terminiamo la traduzione del Tasking Manager 3

ho finito la traduzione dell'ultima decina di stringhe. purtroppo credo non mi sia consentito modificare le stringhe di traduzione inserite da altri. ho notato quelle che credo siano discrepanze su come vengono tradotti alcuni termini tipo "Task". molto spesso vengono lasciati così altre volte

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Incontri mensili nel nuovo anno?

Quindi per il 7 va bene a tutti e due?(Almeno tra quelli che hanno risposto...) On Friday, January 25, 2019, 7:50:23 PM GMT+1, wrote: Arghh io lunedì 28 non ci sono, potrei il lunedì dopo! Sent from my iPhone > On 25 Jan 2019, at 19:12, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > per me

Re: [Talk-it] Perché si guadagna di più non importando cecamente i dati ufficiali

Il 26/01/19 08:34, Aury88 ha scritto: immagino che il problema della scarsità di risorse sia tutt'oggi attuale di conseguenza o non fanno verifiche in continuo ma solo in maniera periodica (ad es. ogni 5 anni) o lo fanno ma non ufficialmente (il singolo addetto che confronta il dato ufficiale