Brad — I make use of BLM / NPS / NF boundary data a lot too. I use Gaia GPS for
this, which overlays this data nicely with what’s in OSM[1]. There are lots of
other outdoor apps that do the same. I prefer this data live outside of OSM as
well for similar reasons as Ian stated. Knowing whether
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 10:42 PM Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> This data is no less verifiable than national forest boundaries and
> federal wilderness boundaries; these generally need to be checked against
> official sources, just as BLM boundaries will.
>
> Municipal boundaries are perhaps even
This data is no less verifiable than national forest boundaries and federal
wilderness boundaries; these generally need to be checked against official
sources, just as BLM boundaries will.
Municipal boundaries are perhaps even harder to verify than boundaries of
BLM land and National Forests in
Ian,
I want to import this data because I think its important for a complete
map. We have national forest, wilderness and national park boundaries
in OSM! This is no different. If you look at many maps they show all
of them.
I'd like it to show up on any map that I use. I'm working
Hi Brad, thanks for proposing this import and posting it here.
I would strongly prefer that we not import boundaries like this into OSM.
Boundaries of all sorts are almost impossible to verify with OSM's "on the
ground" rule, but BLM boundaries in particular are such an edge case (they
have no
I'd like to import BLM (US Bureau of Land Management) boundaries into
OSM. This is not an automated import as you can see from my workflow.
Workflow:
Download shape file from PADUS (1 state at a time):
https://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/data/download/
Load into Qgis and filter for BLM
On 01.01.2019 02:49, scubbx wrote:
Eine der bedeutendsten Ereignisse des vergangenen Jahres war bestimmt,
dass das Konzept von VectorTiles salonfähig wurde (und durch eine der
ersten Implementierungen durch das OpenMapTiles Projekt auf Basis von
OSM Daten in performanter und effizienter Weise
Hi
I'm about to do a GB wide edit changing highway=ford (545) to ford=yes
(4814). I know a few contributors like to get upset about wide area
edits, even when they been discussed, so I thought I'd give you a heads up.
Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=ford for the
Bonjour,
Il y a un an, je m'étais fixé comme projet 2018 la cartographie du
réseau de bus du Maine et Loire : Anjoubus. Un an plus tard, c'est fait,
avec quelques jours de retard !
Les lignes sont en principe bonnes, mais il manque des arrêts. Lorsque
j'avais un doute (pas de marque sur le
perfetto, sembra che grazie alle vostre dritte sia riuscito a sistemare,
sia la relazione che il tag wikipedia, grazie!
Il 05/01/2019 12:56, Federico Cortese ha scritto:
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 12:25 PM Marco wrote:
2) aver aggiunto il parcheggio come membro (inner)
Yes, I think so. Most existing uses use "interval"= in
MM or M format.
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019, 8:34 AM Noémie Lehuby Hello,
>
> Thanks for the doc update, I'll start to work on the French versions.
>
> Is there already some places on OSM that uses theses tags (interval,
> opening_hours and
I've collected these ideas and put them together in the wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Canada/Building_Canada_2020/municipalities
I may have left one or two out but I think practically everything is
covered in the links.
Thanks all for the input.
Cheerio John
On Fri, 4
quel est la plus-value d'avoir l'info en double
dans la définition des couches <> dans le wiki osm.org ?
prenons le cas des dates... on a une umap basé sur eventmachin
que je suggérais d'intégrer dans les headers du proxy-ign pour avoir
une info "automatiquement à jour" dans les différents
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 12:25 PM Marco wrote:
>
> 2) aver aggiunto il parcheggio come membro (inner)
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228761854
>
> Il gruppo di modifiche incriminato è il 66043868
>
E' proprio quella way il problema, perchè è indicata come inner, ma
interseca il poligono
Il giorno sab 5 gen 2019 alle ore 12:25 Marco ha scritto:
> 2) aver aggiunto il parcheggio come membro (inner)
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228761854
il Validatore di JOSM segnala che quella way interseca l'outer (è per
il Validatore che uso principalmente JOSM!)
tra l'altro recentemente
Temporary block has been applied by DWG to affected accounts. Looking
forward to hear back from at least one of them.
DWG is requesting for feedback, and that we raise the following concerns:
* data privacy protection (family names, and information like number of
household members (including
Ciao a tutti.
Stavo risolvendo un po' di note in prossimità di questa relazione
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/273948 e sembra che sia riuscito
a "danneggiarla", in quanto su mapnik la foresta sta piano piano
scomparendo.
Le uniche modifiche consapevoli alla relazione sono state:
Hi, Matt and Andrew
One area for improvement is the mapping of walking and cycling paths and
routes. And a few bicycle lanes, bicycle parking, repair stations etc.It would
be great if paths found on ja.is maps could be freely used on OpenStreetMap,
and the other way around. I guess that depends
18 matches
Mail list logo
