Ahoj, je dostupné vydání 539 týdeníku WeeklyOSM:
https://weeklyosm.eu/cz/archives/13975
* Nabíječky pro auta.
* Sdílení tras.
* Chodník slávy.
* 10 let WeeklyOSM.
* Mapování pro bezpečnost.
* Mapování Joe Bidena.
* Výuka jízdy na kole.
* Německé týdenní mapování.
* Solární elektrárny UK.
*
While I have travelled widely, I call California home (and have for several
decades) so I unapologetically have a parochial perspective from the USA.
Clifford, I deeply respect you, Frederik and many others in OSM: it is a
global project about all of Earth (and its humanity, among other
Frederik,
I've had it with four years of listening to Trump. Not only don't I want to
hear it on OSM but it's completely inappropriate for a mailing list. Can
you please respond in a constructive manner.
Thanks,
Clifford
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 3:45 PM Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/2/20
Dec 3, 2020, 00:44 by frede...@remote.org:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/2/20 23:09, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote:
>
>> FB’s attribution to OSM is available to any viewer in a place that
>> is commonly associated with attribution.
>>
>> Barely visible icon that must be clicked is not a standard place
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 2:56 PM Michal Migurski wrote:
> In some specific cases there may be a conflict of interest where I’d
> recuse myself, but in general it’s much more likely that FB and other
> companies’ need for a high-quality, free, global map with a healthy org
> behind it is *strongly
Hi,
On 12/2/20 23:09, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote:
> FB’s attribution to OSM is available to any viewer in a place that
> is commonly associated with attribution.
>
> Barely visible icon that must be clicked is not a standard place for
> attribution.
Agree with Mateusz, and I'm
Michal Migurski:
Hi Robert, Martin, Alexandre, Jochen, Richard, Tom:
Thanks for your followups in this conversation! I am speaking here as an individual
and not on behalf of Facebook,
great.
...
First, the text of the ODbL is explicit about “reasonably calculated” awareness. FB
believes
> First, the text of the ODbL is explicit about “reasonably calculated”
> awareness. FB believes its maps comply with this. The ODbL does not require
> that “every” person see the attribution. It requires that “any” person can.
> FB’s attribution to OSM is available to any viewer in a place
Hi Michal,,
> Successful attribution guidelines published by the OSMF will make it much
> easier to decide how to interpret the ODbL.
The problem is, I expect the current draft will not get support from the
community so for me its back to my original question.
Given the community
Dear Steve, thank you for reminding me there's something called ESRI.
they approached the Telegram group in March last year:
https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama/1641
we were invited to a meeting, and I was able to accept the invitation.
Dec 2, 2020, 22:50 by m...@teczno.com:
> The ODbL does not require that “every” person see the attribution. It
> requires that “any” person can.
>
Untrue.
"notice associated withthe Produced Work reasonably calculated to make any
Person that
uses,views, accesses, interacts with, or is
I would suggest that if someone could identify a list of mapping tasks
suitable for beginners that might help this sort of thing happening again.
I'd done a fair amount of validation of HOT tasks in the past which I'm
sure are similar and I'm more than aware of the amount of effort needed to
Hi Robert, Martin, Alexandre, Jochen, Richard, Tom:
Thanks for your followups in this conversation! I am speaking here as an
individual and not on behalf of Facebook, so I’m going to focus on the areas
relevant to board candidacy.
First, the text of the ODbL is explicit about “reasonably
I forgot to include links to the tasks:
in Colón I had created a project to assist a mapper from USA keep the
rest of us informed about his progress, and as said YMUP requested a
project on top of it. I have marked as unavailable the area of their
project.
Hi Rory,
let's include the list, so you're talking with the whole community, not
just to me.
BACKGROUND: we're trying to have the YouthMappers Chapter of the
University of Panama consider they're mapping within OSM, that there's a
local community of mappers already mapping, and with some
Olá!
Deixo aqui links para 2 tutoriais em vídeo que fiz:
1.Tomar notas de Voz com o OSMAND e editar com o JOSM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35WRtD2Oi4E
2.Como usar o JOSM com queries Overpass
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3_utXmMgyU
Não sei se existe um local onde estejam agregados
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 20:01, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> Aktualizoval jsem
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:JOSM/Plugins/Tracer
> a smazal z toho starý balast.
>
Díky moc, tohle chtělo!
H.
___
talk-cz mailing list
talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
Tak dneska na pivě jsme se dost bavili o Traceru a díky trpělivosti Mariana
jsme si ho minimálně dva lidi nově rozchodili.
Aktualizoval jsem
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:JOSM/Plugins/Tracer
a smazal z toho starý balast.
Takže pokud někdo chcete vyzkoušet Tracer, tak směle do toho. :)
Dne 02.12.2020 v 16:14 Jiri Vlasak napsal(a):
komunikace přes email *je standardní* (nikoli poměrně.) OSM (nejen cz) komunita
mailing listy používá s úspěchem po celém světě [1].
Já bych navíc dodal, že email má opravdu každý! Už jen proto, že
registrace na kdejakých jiných komunikačních
Le 02.12.20 à 18:23, Florian LAINEZ a écrit :
> faut-il nommer le footway qui traverse une place avec le nom de la place ?
s'il n'y a aucun autre objet qui représente la place,
c'est une amélioration de le faire ainsi non ?
Bien sur faire une surface pour la place est encore mieux
Le 02/12/2020 à 17:48, Christian Quest a écrit :
Est-ce vraiment un faux positif ?
Si il n'y a pas d'autre highway...
Un highway=service qui veut s'appeler « Place de la Vallée Beaujean »
Mais ça c'est aux humains de filtrer...
--
GnuPg : 156520BBC8F5B1E3 Because privacy matters.
« Quand
C'est pas forcément souhaitable, mais quand il n'y a rien d'autre pour
porter le nom de la place c'est ce que je fais (en tagguant un peu pour
BANO, j'avoue).
Le 02/12/2020 à 18:23, Florian LAINEZ a écrit :
ok c'est un débat de modélisation du coup : faut-il nommer le footway
qui traverse une
ok c'est un débat de modélisation du coup : faut-il nommer le footway qui
traverse une place avec le nom de la place ?
Perso je ne le fais pas, mais j'admet que le débat mérite d'exister.
Le mer. 2 déc. 2020 à 17:48, Christian Quest a
écrit :
> Le 02/12/2020 à 14:44, Florian LAINEZ a écrit :
>
Le 02/12/2020 à 14:44, Florian LAINEZ a écrit :
la majorité des faux positifs est sur les highway=footway
exemple type : suggestion d'ajouter name="place de l'église" sur une
footway qui traverse la place principale.
peut-être désactiver les footway ?
Est-ce vraiment un faux positif ?
Si il
-- Původní e-mail --
Od: Jiri Vlasak
Komu: R3gi , OpenStreetMap Czech Republic
Datum: 2. 12. 2020 16:18:33
Předmět: Re: [talk-cz] Moderní komunikační kanál?
"Ahoj,
> Chápu, měnit zaběhnutné zvyklosti je obtížné. Koneckonců, u starých open
source projektů je to běžný neduh. Ano,
Ahoj,
> Chápu, měnit zaběhnutné zvyklosti je obtížné. Koneckonců, u starých open
> source projektů je to běžný neduh. Ano, komunikace přes e-mail je poměrně
> standardní, ale už pouhým pohledem na přehlednost, strukturu, potažmo vzhled,
> této jedné konverzace věřím uznáte, že není vhodná na
la majorité des faux positifs est sur les highway=footway
exemple type : suggestion d'ajouter name="place de l'église" sur une
footway qui traverse la place principale.
peut-être désactiver les footway ?
Le mer. 2 déc. 2020 à 10:00, Christian Quest a
écrit :
> Oui, le matching est réglé pour
> proposer class:* est donc revenir en arrière
Je ne souhaite pas ressusciter cette clé :)
>un tel mot est trop générique et finit par avoir tout et n'importe quoi
pour le cycliste
On est d'accord. Si j'ai parlé de la notion de confort, il ne me viendrait
pas à l'idée de vouloir en faire un
Le 01.12.20 à 23:52, Mathieu a écrit :
> Je viens de jeter un œil à class:bicycle
pour donner le contexte, la clef class
a été déprécié en 2006 en faveur de highway
proposer class:* est donc revenir en arrière.
pourquoi pas s'il y a des arguments, mais le principal
argument contre que je constate
sent from a phone
> On 2. Dec 2020, at 11:15, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
>
> I don't have any terms of service - as a non-profit/research project it's all
> quite informal
consider setting up some simple terms, even short ones, where you deny all
responsibility, liability and guarantee and
I would like to ask a question related to #1.
Let's make a thought exercise. OSM provides geographical data, right? By
definition, a map is a visualization of geographical and other types of
data. In this case, a tile server is nothing more than the visual
representation of the geographical data.
Ahoj,
díky za info - Tomáš mi zavolal, tak jsem to teď opravil.
Obě mapy mi nyní fungují na osmap.cz.
P.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 8:52 AM Tom Ka wrote:
> Ahoj, diky za report, zkusim kopnout do zbyho, snad bude reagovat.
>
> Bye tom.k
>
> st 2. 12. 2020 v 0:14 odesílatel r00t via talk-cz
>
Le 01.12.20 à 15:50, emeric Prouteau a écrit :
> Il y a effectivement 3 activités différentes mais pratiquées par la même
> entité (La ferme des 4 vents). Ce qui conduit à mettre le même "name"
> sur tous les nœuds
ou pas :)
à mes yeux le magasin et la balade touristique ne porte pas le nom de la
Hello Frederik,
OK - thanks for that. That clears things up quite nicely I think.
I have too many "day job" obligations at the moment to set it up as a
business, but the thought has crossed my mind for the future.
Thanks,
Nick
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:03 PM Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On
Hello Martn,
I believe I 'probably' don't have any obligation, but I am just being
cautious as we do appear to live in a very litigious world and I just want
to be safe. It's a case of whether there is some automatic 'implied rights'
for users when there are no terms of service.
I don't have any
Dec 2, 2020, 05:30 by 61sundow...@gmail.com:
> On 2/12/20 3:54 am, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-au wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dec 1, 2020, 01:17 by >> 61sundow...@gmail.com>> :
>>
>>> On 1/12/20 12:18 am, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-au wrote:
>>>
Nov 30, 2020, 13:10 by
Dec 2, 2020, 09:49 by nickw4...@gmail.com:
> I have contacted the company asking them if it was OK to delete their
> panoramas (as the content is arguably 'inappropritate' for a walking-oriented
> site) nd they replied to me, in a friendly and cooperative way, saying they
> would setup
On 02/12/2020 09:27, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Michal Migurski wrote:
> FB’s attribution approach in keeping with best practices
seen from other commercial users of display maps.
In the spirit of Twitter footnoting one of Donald Trump's "I won the
election" tweets, this is your respectful
Hi,
On 02.12.20 09:49, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
> As I said I am paying for this out of my own money and do not want the
> storage space to be used for purposes other than panos of walking trails.
I think you have already done *much* more than can be expected of you. I
would have removed the data
Am Mi., 2. Dez. 2020 um 09:51 Uhr schrieb Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) <
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 03:41, Michal Migurski wrote:
>
> > Facebook is in compliance with the ODbL license which requires that
> attribution be “reasonably calculated to make any Person
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 07:36:24PM -0800, Michal Migurski wrote:
> Facebook is in compliance with the ODbL license which requires that
> attribution be “reasonably calculated to make any Person that uses, views,
> accesses, interacts with, or is otherwise exposed to the Produced Work aware”
>
IANAL, but why do you believe you could have any obligation to host their
content on your server?
Do you have terms of service?
Cheers
Martin
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Michal Migurski wrote:
> FB’s attribution approach in keeping with best practices
> seen from other commercial users of display maps.
In the spirit of Twitter footnoting one of Donald Trump's "I won the election"
tweets, this is your respectful reminder that Google, Bing, Here, Tencent,
buongiorno a tutti,
inoltro la comunicazione di Paolo Dabove, presidente dell'Associazione
GFOSS.it, sulla richiesta di presentazione contributi per l'evento ASITA
2021.
vi chiediamo di valutare l'opportunità di presentare qualche vostro lavoro
attinente al tema software geografico libero e ai
Oui, le matching est réglé pour limiter les faux positifs.
Petit rappel: cette analyse existe depuis 2016, elle a juste été un peu
oubliée et était cassée comme le rendu depuis le passage à BANOv2.
La preuve ici:
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/errors/graph.png?item=7170=32
Le
Hello everyone,
Apologies - this is not directly related to OpenStreetMap itself but is
related to a site of mine which uses OpenStreetMap data so I thought I'd
post my question here to get opinions.
I have been developing a site OpenTrailView (https://opentrailview.org) to
collect 360 panoramas
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 03:41, Michal Migurski wrote:
> Facebook is in compliance with the ODbL license which requires that
> attribution be “reasonably calculated to make any Person that uses, views,
> accesses, interacts with, or is otherwise exposed to the Produced Work aware”
> of OSM’s
Ahoj,
abych taky přidal pár kapek do mlýna - dvě věci, co tu ještě myslím nepadly:
- Větvení tématu. Osobně používám Thunderbird a na druhém PC Gmail na webu.
Thunderbird větvení řeší, umí (s občasnými chybami) větvit odpovědi podle
toho, kdo na co odpověděl do stromové struktury. Většina lidí ale
Buongiorno a tutte e tutti,
insieme a Maurizio Napolitano e Marco Minghini stiamo cercando di
raccogliere informazioni su come in Italia le informazioni geografiche,
e in particolare mappe e dati OpenStreetMap, sono state usate a supporto
del contrasto dell'emergenza COVID-19, con l'obiettivo
49 matches
Mail list logo
