On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:25:47PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> > I'm not saying OSM as an open database is failing. I just think the
> > survey+map model requires many more people than we'll ever find.
>
> You are too impatient and you fail to see the great results we already
> prod
On 7-10-2014 0:56, Stefan de Konink wrote:
On Monday, October 6, 2014 5:47:03 PM CEST, Stefan de Konink wrote:
- De data mirror wordt geplaatst op een server met tenminste 2x 1TB
aan
SATA in RAID-1, een niet rundante 500GB SSD en 3x 73GB SAS schijven.
Het systeem heeft zelf 128GB aan
hi,
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 08:36:47AM +0200, Marc Gemis wrote:
> I didn't say anybody claim that. I'm just wondering whether it failed. So
> far we haven't seen a country that is capable to add the same amount of
> address data by crowd-surfing as the imports in Denmark or The Netherlands.
> So
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 06:48:58AM +0200, Marc Gemis wrote:
> After 3.5 years and 34.000 addresses, I have to admit that an import is the
> only way to get addresses in OSM fast.
I have done the same amount of Adresses and meanwhile my area is more or
less complete. I think of imports as beei
4 matches
Mail list logo