Re: [Talk-transit] Conversation on this list (was: Proposed Feature - RFC - Public Transport)

2010-12-14 Thread Gregory Arenius
On 12/14/2010 07:56 AM, MichaƂ Borsuk wrote: I already told you twice to behave, you little shit. If it continues, I will have you removed from the list. That type of language and attitude is completely inappropriate. If someone needs to be removed from the list there a much better ways

Re: [Talk-transit] bus stops/platforms with electronic display of when the buses pass through

2010-10-01 Thread Gregory Arenius
Hi, For bus stops I use ticker=yes/no. I'm sure I saw that documented somewhere and didn't come up with it on my own but a fairly exhaustive wiki search to provide a link for you came up completely dry so who knows. Cheers, Greg On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed additional tags for bus stops and an import of San Fracisco data

2010-07-31 Thread Gregory Arenius
I would love to see GTFS data imported into OSM, especially the SF data if you can convince them to change the license. I think the street= tag is a good idea. I'm unsure of the bearing tag. If we know which street the stop is on and where the stop is the direction the bus is going follows from

Re: [Talk-transit] tagging stops served by multiple routes by more than one transit agency

2010-07-24 Thread Gregory Arenius
When I tag bus stops with multiple operators I add the operator name to the route_ref. In the above example of HART and USF I would tag the stop as: operator=hart;usf hart_route_ref=5;12 usf_route_ref=A;C I always include route information in my bus stop tagging. I think it is more than just