On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 11:40 -0700, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
> I think people most
> tag according to importance anyway.
> this brings us to the topic of tiger import again. there are too many
> roads tagged as residential.
Agreed. You'd think after people complaining after the first one, t
I decided to try another approach. I used the tile picker from here:
http://ulrichkuester.de/OSM/CoordinateToOSMTile.html
and got the tiles from here:
http://osm.ammit.de/osm/latest/img/
with a little wget and a bash script. I then used the mkgmap commands
what Lambertus talks
Alan Mintz wrote:
> As is well known apparently, at some point in the last couple of months,
> the Yahoo imagery available through WMS became pixelated and difficult to
> use at zoom levels high enough to trace individual streets.
[snip]
> 2. Is there a better solution (in places where USGS urban
+1
given the length of some interstates this is highly recommended.
On 7 Sep 2009, at 12:12 , Richard Welty wrote:
> given that there is apparent concensus that Interstate relations be
> done
> on a state-by-state
> basis, perhaps the language on the Interstate_Highways_Relations page
> should
given that there is apparent concensus that Interstate relations be done
on a state-by-state
basis, perhaps the language on the Interstate_Highways_Relations page
should be updated:
Avoid relation proliferation, if possible. If a relation already exists
for the route you are
tagging, you can re
full support for all your arguments.
there are a few places where the wiki is different and I think we
should change these definitions.
1) National Forest Service, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Power
Administration, and Bureau of Land Management routes
.
highway (required) track or tertiary d
Lars Ahlzen wrote:
> Either way, I guess the thing for me to do would be to clean things up
> just enough to be readable and then put the code and instructions up on
> the wiki. Then we can all play with it. :)
If you want to try it out, I put the scripts and other files up at
http://toposm.com
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> There are streets in my town (Stow, MA) that are definitely not paved
>> that I have driven on with a Saturn SC2 and not had a problem.
>
> OK, but can you drive them in a PT Cruiser Touring Edition, a Porche
> 911, or some other low-slung, sti
Paul Johnson writes:
> OK, but can you drive them in a PT Cruiser Touring Edition, a Porche
> 911, or some other low-slung, stiff-suspension vehicle on it without
> problems? How about a road bicycle (which absolutely depends on
> pavement)? Probably not going to be happening.
Yes, you'd be ok
Hi Paul and Greg and talk-us,
Your points regarding tagging of gravel roads, highway vs. path vs.
trail, and vehicle choice are points that come up in the OSM community
from time to time. For further discussion and to see how previous
discussions have resolved, consider looking up the discussion
On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 21:49 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Paul Johnson writes:
>
> > On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 07:30 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> >
> >> It depends on what the road is like. If it's a decent dirt road that
> >> normal cars routinely drive on, has a street name, is considered a
> >> publ
On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 21:12 -0700, Dion Dock wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> In my neighborhood there are some unpaved residential streets. How
> >> should those be tagged?
> >>
> >> highway=track
> >>
> >> highway=residential
> >> surface=unpaved
> >
> > I would tend to go with highway=track unle
12 matches
Mail list logo
