this is an old topic on talk and never a final agreement. changing the wiki
might create big discussions
I agree with your definition and use it the same way.
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Val Kartchner wrote:
> The descriptions on the wiki are quite ambiguous as to when to use path,
> track
I know that the current preferred method for tagging trail routes is
with relationships. However, I don't know whether or not to assign
names to the segments of the trails. The wiki doesn't seem to specify,
at least not that I've found, so I'll ask here.
Around Ogden, several cities have their o
On 5/7/10 3:50 PM, Val Kartchner wrote:
> The descriptions on the wiki are quite ambiguous as to when to use path,
> track, cycleway, footway or bridleway. There aren't any places around
> here that I've tagged as bridleway, so I'll leave that one alone for
> now. Otherwise, here is the criteria
The descriptions on the wiki are quite ambiguous as to when to use path,
track, cycleway, footway or bridleway. There aren't any places around
here that I've tagged as bridleway, so I'll leave that one alone for
now. Otherwise, here is the criteria that I have been using:
Path: Unpaved, narrow w
4 matches
Mail list logo
