Re: [Talk-us] Address Node Import for San Francisco

2010-12-12 Thread SteveC
Just wanna say that addressing in SF would be awesome :-) Steve stevecoast.com On Dec 10, 2010, at 1:29 AM, Katie Filbert wrote: > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote: > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Gregory Arenius wrote: > > I've been working on an import of San Franci

[Talk-us] High Priority Corridors?

2010-12-12 Thread Ian Dees
It appears that User:NE2 has added a tag "NHS_High_Priority_Corridor" to hundred of ways around the country. Has anyone seen such an automated edit proposal anywhere on the mailing lists? Not only is this tag named inconsistantly with the rest of the tags we've used in the past (I'd rather see it

Re: [Talk-us] High Priority Corridors?

2010-12-12 Thread Richard Welty
On 12/12/10 10:30 AM, Ian Dees wrote: It appears that User:NE2 has added a tag "NHS_High_Priority_Corridor" to hundred of ways around the country. Has anyone seen such an automated edit proposal anywhere on the mailing lists? Not only is this tag named inconsistantly with the rest of the tags

Re: [Talk-us] Address Node Import for San Francisco

2010-12-12 Thread Michal Migurski
On Dec 9, 2010, at 3:00 PM, Gregory Arenius wrote: > About the data. Its in a shapefile format containing about 230,000 > individual nodes. The data is really high quality and all of the addresses I > have checked are correct. It has pretty complete coverage of the entire city. I've worked w

Re: [Talk-us] High Priority Corridors?

2010-12-12 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Richard Welty wrote: > i concur, the NHS tagging should be done as route relations. They don't work as relations, since they're not always routes that can be followed from start to end. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] High Priority Corridors?

2010-12-12 Thread Nathan Edgars II
Oops - meant to send this to the list. On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Richard Welty > wrote: >> i concur, the NHS tagging should be done as route relations. > > They don't work as relations, since they're not always routes that can >

Re: [Talk-us] High Priority Corridors?

2010-12-12 Thread Ian Dees
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Richard Welty > wrote: > > i concur, the NHS tagging should be done as route relations. > > They don't work as relations, since they're not always routes that can > be followed from start to end. > > Then

Re: [Talk-us] High Priority Corridors?

2010-12-12 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Nathan Edgars II > wrote: >> >> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Richard Welty >> wrote: >> > i concur, the NHS tagging should be done as route relations. >> >> They don't work as relations, since they're not al

Re: [Talk-us] High Priority Corridors?

2010-12-12 Thread Nathan Edgars II
OK, how's this for a relation? http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1319303 ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] High Priority Corridors?

2010-12-12 Thread Ian Dees
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > OK, how's this for a relation? > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1319303 > While I'm happy to see them in a relation, I still question having such data in OSM. If there is no possible way for OSM mappers to improve the data

Re: [Talk-us] High Priority Corridors?

2010-12-12 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Nathan Edgars II > wrote: >> >> OK, how's this for a relation? >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1319303 > > While I'm happy to see them in a relation, I still question having such data > in OSM. > I

Re: [Talk-us] High Priority Corridors?

2010-12-12 Thread Richard Weait
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Ian Dees wrote: > It appears that User:NE2 has added a tag "NHS_High_Priority_Corridor" to > hundred of ways around the country. Has anyone seen such an automated edit > proposal anywhere on the mailing lists? > Not only is this tag named inconsistantly with the r

Re: [Talk-us] High Priority Corridors?

2010-12-12 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Richard Weait wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Ian Dees wrote: >> It appears that User:NE2 has added a tag "NHS_High_Priority_Corridor" to >> hundred of ways around the country. Has anyone seen such an automated edit >> proposal anywhere on the mailing l

Re: [Talk-us] High Priority Corridors?

2010-12-12 Thread Richard Welty
On 12/12/10 4:50 PM, Ian Dees wrote: On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Nathan Edgars II > wrote: On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Richard Welty mailto:rwe...@averillpark.net>> wrote: > i concur, the NHS tagging should be done as route relations. They d

Re: [Talk-us] High Priority Corridors?

2010-12-12 Thread Richard Welty
On 12/12/10 5:19 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Ian Dees wrote: On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: OK, how's this for a relation? http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1319303 While I'm happy to see them in a relation, I still questio

Re: [Talk-us] High Priority Corridors?

2010-12-12 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Richard Welty wrote: > NHS is a datapoint for what roads the US DOD thinks are important > in a military crisis. You're thinking of the Strategic Highway Network, which, together with the Interstates, is less than half of the entire NHS mileage. The NHS is a much

Re: [Talk-us] High Priority Corridors?

2010-12-12 Thread Paul Johnson
On 12/12/2010 04:31 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Richard Weait > wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Ian Dees >> wrote: >>> It appears that User:NE2 has added a tag "NHS_High_Priority_Corridor" to >>> hundred of ways around the country. Has anyone seen

Re: [Talk-us] High Priority Corridors?

2010-12-12 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > On 12/12/2010 04:31 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Richard Weait >> wrote: >>> Sure would be nice to see people following more / all of the import >>> guidelines. >> >> Perhaps that would be nice, but I don't

Re: [Talk-us] High Priority Corridors?

2010-12-12 Thread Ian Dees
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On 12/12/2010 04:31 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Richard Weait < > richard-gnthur35lhcavxtiumw...@public.gmane.org> wrote: > >>> Sure would be n

Re: [Talk-us] High Priority Corridors?

2010-12-12 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > While it may not be an import in the sense of "convert a shapefile to OSM > format and send it to the API", it is a mass inclusion of external data. The > import guidelines could still be followed in such situations. It's no more a mass inclusio