* Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com [2012-04-04 22:26 -0400]:
On 4/4/2012 10:23 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
There seems to be a problem here with US 17-92:
http://elrond.aperiodic.net/shields/?zoom=12lat=28.96029lon=-81.31906layers=B0
Change over to sign style and a bunch of shields appear.
* Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org [2012-04-04 11:54 -0700]:
More requests: in addition to its circular-shield state highway
system, Kentucky also has an ad-hoc parkway network. [1] At least
some of them are tagged `network=US:KY:Parkway` with a shield URL in
`symbol`.
The Kentucky Parkways are on
* Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org [2012-04-04 14:01 -0700]:
OK, I'll bite. How is putting banners in the network tag
preferential? why not something like...
network=US:TX:FM
modifier=Business
network=US:US
modifier=Business
is_in=Maryland
Each of the potential tagging schemes had
* Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com [2012-04-05 08:14 -0400]:
* Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org [2012-04-04 11:54 -0700]:
Looks like the Indiana Toll Road has no relation yet.
That's fine. We don't have a shield for it yet either. :)
Ah. And that's because my visit to Wikipedia left me unsure what
Hello everybody,
there is a report at
http://www.spiegel.de/
about OSM based maps. Report is in german.
WernerP
URL of report
http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/0,1518,825561,00.html
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Thanks for the link, the author seems pretty well-informed on OSM and
surrounding ecosystem. I like the emphasis on OSM as a data source and not
primarily a source of maps, something that a lot of people do not seem to
buy into yet. (I am thinking about some of the commentary around
foursquare's
On 4/5/2012 8:14 AM, Phil! Gold wrote:
New York's parkways have a similar problem with legibility. One of my
plans for dealing with them is to use larger shield images at high zoom
levels.
The Long Island parkways are nice and legible:
http://alpsroads.net/roads/ny/ocean/e3.jpg
Most other
I think it's clear from this discussion that we *don't* have any
consensus on how best to tag relations for bannered routes.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it's clear from this discussion that we *don't* have any consensus
on how best to tag relations for bannered routes.
... yet. Hence why it's important to have the discussion.
After more thought, in the general
Howdy folks,
Thank you all for your thoughts. I am now aware that it's a
complicated thing to Add data in bulk to a crowdsourced database.
Users have eloquently argued both for and against the import of the
building footprints I'm working on, and I find it boils down to a pair
of
I just fixed the ref tag on all of the I-26 relations (I 26 26), so, those
should render correctly the next time any section of that route gets
re-rendered. -- James ___
Talk-us mailing list
Ngày 2012-04-05 5:46 AM, Phil! Gold viết:
* Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com [2012-04-05 08:14 -0400]:
* Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org [2012-04-04 11:54 -0700]:
Looks like the Indiana Toll Road has no relation yet.
That's fine. We don't have a shield for it yet either. :)
Ah. And that's because
Ngày 2012-04-05 5:14 AM, Phil! Gold viết:
* Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org [2012-04-04 11:54 -0700]:
More requests: in addition to its circular-shield state highway
system, Kentucky also has an ad-hoc parkway network. [1] At least
some of them are tagged `network=US:KY:Parkway` with a shield URL in
13 matches
Mail list logo
