Re: [Talk-us] Road Expansions and Seattle Imports (if you're the Seattle importer, please read!)

2012-05-19 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote: On 5/19/2012 12:52 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:  Ultimately, the only way to get a 100% successful upload is to query the changeset on failure to determine what was actually uploaded, then resume from that point. While true, that

Re: [Talk-us] Road Expansions and Seattle Imports (if you're the Seattle importer, please read!)

2012-05-19 Thread Paul Norman
From: Serge Wroclawski [mailto:emac...@gmail.com] Seattle importer, please read!) Getting back to the current TIGER expansion, I decided it would be a mistake to try a large scale import without having some way of ensuring that the uploads were being done correctly, and so I've been working

Re: [Talk-us] Road Expansions and Seattle Imports (if you're the Seattle importer, please read!)

2012-05-19 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: From: Serge Wroclawski [mailto:emac...@gmail.com] Seattle importer, please read!) Getting back to the current TIGER expansion, I decided it would be a mistake to try a large scale import without having some way of ensuring

Re: [Talk-us] Road Expansions and Seattle Imports (if you're the Seattle importer, please read!)

2012-05-19 Thread andrzej zaborowski
On 19 May 2012 21:02, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote: On 5/19/2012 12:52 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:  Ultimately, the only way to get a 100% successful upload is to query the changeset on failure to determine what was