I've noticed some odd things on OpenCycleMap and other renderings, and I
think it's due to a difference in how things are in the UK vs. here.
*Most railways have passenger service. Thus OCM (and the transport map)
show all rail lines.
*Tracks are useful for cycling. When you zoom in on OCM,
The landuse import for Georgia (which IMO is poor-quality and should be
deleted, but that's not going to happen) has a bunch of areas tagged as
note = Forested Wetland with no useful natural=* tags (since
natural=wood and natural=wetland both apply). Example:
On 5/29/2012 10:00 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 05/29/12 11:57, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
*Most railways have passenger service. Thus OCM (and the transport map)
show all rail lines.
But isn't a railway an obstacle for cyclists no matter what services
they support?
Sure. But that would
3 matches
Mail list logo