Martijn van Exel m at rtijn.org writes:
Also, how is the situation on the state level? I notice that for some
states, there are no State Route relation pages.
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_Numbered_Highway_Relations#See_also)
NE2 finished Ohio's route relations at such speed
Thanks Ian. I guess that'll have to do!
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Fixed the crossdomain.xml problem as best I can tell, but now seeing that
there's just not any data there. Looks like the USGS is returning white
tiles for zooms 13 in that area.
Frederik -
Thank you for taking the time to write up your impressions (and for coming
out to San Francisco in the first place) - this is really helpful for
creating better conferences.
tea, chocolate and delicate mini cakes during practially all the breaks ;)
You can't beat that :)
On the
Serge -
You're not doing yourself justice as initiator and organizer of what are
the first sprint days at a US State of the Map. I actually think the sprint
days went very well - we had amazing turn out for both days and great work
happened. So: I see absolutely no need to feel badly and thank
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Also, how is the situation on the state level? I notice that for some
states, there are no State Route relation pages. (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_Numbered_Highway_Relations#See_also
)
I'm
Yeah, I'm guessing interstates and US routes are mostly done. The things
that might be missing is bannered routes (truck, business, etc). I suspect
that state highways are going to be a patchwork. I'm pretty sure I've got
most of the major and a good number of minor Kansas highways done. This
wiki
Curious if you guys are using US:KS for the network, which would fit the
pattern or not? I ask because on the way's ref tags, some people are
correctly using KS, but others are just using K.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, I'm guessing
Following up on this as a reminder, let's get together at 5PM Pacific /
8PM Eastern to see how we can make this happen. Again, I am willing to put
in time, but I will need help. I prefer a Google hangout but IRC works for
me as well.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Martijn van Exel
Yes, the relations are all tagged correctly with network=US:KS. As for the
ref on the ways, anything I've touched is KS. There was another user who
did a bunch as K-xx for a while but I think I convinced him that we should
go with KS and put K-xx in a loc_ref tag or something like that.
Toby
On
Wondering if there may be a better way to collaborate on route maintenance,
a way to see if routes are being maintained / created per area, and by
whom... Oh wait, that would be the groups feature we are working on[1].
[1] https://github.com/osmlab/datadashboard/issues/1 and
Fortunately most of Texas has been done, but unfortunately the FM/RM roads
haven't been completed and there are quite a lot of them. I made a Mapcraft
to help add relations to them all: http://mapcraft.nanodesu.ru/pie/269
I've made a little progress in the Texas Panhandle but we definitely need
Curious if the network for RM and FM is consistently US:TX:FM for both,
since they're both part of the same network.
On Jun 19, 2013 10:52 AM, Clay Smalley claysmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Fortunately most of Texas has been done, but unfortunately the FM/RM roads
haven't been completed and there
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Following up on this as a reminder, let's get together at 5PM Pacific /
8PM Eastern to see how we can make this happen. Again, I am willing to put
in time, but I will need help. I prefer a Google hangout but IRC works for
I've been doing a lot of work on the FM and RM roads already. The RM's should
all be done already. The FM roads are done for everything west of I-35, except
for the Panhandle, where I was just straightening and not adding relations.
Anything I've worked on Everything is done generally north
It's US:TX:FM for FM roads, and US:TX:RM for RM roads. There may be little
to no overlap between RM and FM, and they may serve the same purpose, but I
see no need to go through them all and change all of them to one network.
They are different networks according to the state of Texas.
On Jun 19,
I'm pretty confident (but with G+ you never know) that this is the event
link:
https://plus.google.com/events/casn33o1v25faad4jvocqdu1jg4
Info on the actual hangout link should appear there shortly before we start.
Martijn
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Clay Smalley claysmal...@gmail.com
An update to the talk-us pages on what most here might feel got
typed to death in a lengthy thread.
Kerry and I have recently exchanged over a dozen missives, resulting
in substantial improvement in how OSM captures data representing
national bicycle routes. However, due to slower render
TxDOT is cited in Wikipedia as documenting them as being the same network
(farm to market), and no RM and FM have the same number. They just change
the sign to RM when the route primarily passes through ranches instead of
farms. According to TxDOT, there is exactly one Ranch Road, being RR 1,
Does the Wikipedia bit have a cited source? I can understand that being
true; I just want to verify. The Texas Highway Designation Files list them
as two separate types.
On Jun 19, 2013 8:25 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
TxDOT is cited in Wikipedia as documenting them as being the
19 matches
Mail list logo
