Yes, the relations are all tagged correctly with network=US:KS. As for the ref on the ways, anything I've touched is KS. There was another user who did a bunch as K-xx for a while but I think I convinced him that we should go with KS and put K-xx in a loc_ref tag or something like that.
Toby On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > Curious if you guys are using US:KS for the network, which would fit the > pattern or not? I ask because on the way's ref tags, some people are > correctly using KS, but others are just using K. > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Toby Murray <toby.mur...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> Yeah, I'm guessing interstates and US routes are mostly done. The things >> that might be missing is bannered routes (truck, business, etc). I suspect >> that state highways are going to be a patchwork. I'm pretty sure I've got >> most of the major and a good number of minor Kansas highways done. This >> wiki page should fairly accurately reflect reality: >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kansas_state_highways >> >> Toby >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: >> >>> A related question - do we have a clear idea of route relation >>> completeness in the US? Looking at >>> >>> >>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_Numbered_Highway_Relations >>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Interstate_Highways_Relations >>> >>> This look pretty well organized, but I know how wikis can be deceiving >>> like that. >>> Also, how is the situation on the state level? I notice that for some >>> states, there are no State Route relation pages. ( >>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_Numbered_Highway_Relations#See_also >>> ) >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Great. I am just catching up on SOTM US talks and watching yours. >>>> Enjoying it a lot! >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Phil! Gold <phi...@pobox.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> * Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> [2013-06-18 10:40 -0600]: >>>>> > Perhaps we can get together on IRC sometime soon and see what would >>>>> need to >>>>> > be done. I can't make tonight but tomorrow early evening (like, 6PM >>>>> MDT) >>>>> > would work. Ian, Phil, Toby, are you around then? >>>>> >>>>> That's 8pm for me, which might work. Depending on other stuff I have >>>>> going on that evening, I might not be available until 8:30 or so (EDT). >>>>> (Wednesday's my only free evening this week, so if it doesn't work I >>>>> won't >>>>> be available until Saturday sometime.) >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Talk-us mailing list >>>>> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org >>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Martijn van Exel >>>> http://oegeo.wordpress.com/ >>>> http://openstreetmap.us/ >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Martijn van Exel >>> http://oegeo.wordpress.com/ >>> http://openstreetmap.us/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-us mailing list >>> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-us mailing list >> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
