On 26/01/14 19:22, Richard Welty wrote:
On 1/26/14 2:13 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 1/26/14 2:07 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Could it be because the polygon has place_name=Willits as an
attribute? In that case, would it be safe to delete this attribute, as
it is the name of the relationship that
Common "outlying areas" of "corporate municipality" (city) boundaries
in the USA include landfills, recycling/material storage/transfer
centers, corporation yards (equipment storage and/or service areas,
sometimes fabrication, e.g. signage), water and sewage treatment
plants, and in some cases
On 1/26/14 2:13 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
> On 1/26/14 2:07 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
>>
>> Could it be because the polygon has place_name=Willits as an
>> attribute? In that case, would it be safe to delete this attribute, as
>> it is the name of the relationship that's important?
>>
> maybe, but
On 1/26/14 2:07 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> On 26/01/14 18:54, Richard Welty wrote:
>> the relation is named Willits, which is as it should be, so this is
>> properly a tools issue rather than a data issue.
>>
>> Nominatim came up with two answers for Willits. one was the
>> individual polygon, an
On 26/01/14 18:54, Richard Welty wrote:
On 1/26/14 1:46 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Thanks all. Is it possibly to make it so that a search in OSM for
Willits, CA brings up the whole relationship - as opposed to several
separate elements, which when clicked send you to some spot in the
middle of n
On 1/26/14 1:46 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
>
> Thanks all. Is it possibly to make it so that a search in OSM for
> Willits, CA brings up the whole relationship - as opposed to several
> separate elements, which when clicked send you to some spot in the
> middle of nowhere? If all of them are part o
On 26/01/14 17:53, Richard Welty wrote:
On 1/26/14 12:36 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I'm doing a bit of mapping in Willits, CA - and a quick search of
Willits, CA in OSM returns this lonely polygon in the middle of,
pretty much, nowhere:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/39.38187/-123.30127
On 1/26/14 12:56 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
> In Bing imagery I see what might be a disused sewage treatment tank just to
> the south of the area originally highlighted. Around here that is one
> common thing that ends up being a separate little section of city boundary.
> You can easily see the whole
In Bing imagery I see what might be a disused sewage treatment tank just to
the south of the area originally highlighted. Around here that is one
common thing that ends up being a separate little section of city boundary.
You can easily see the whole relation on osm.org:
http://www.openstreetmap.or
On 1/26/14 12:48 PM, Tod Fitch wrote:
> Looks like the administrative boundary relation for Willits has four separate
> unconnected areas.
>
> (Right click on the boundary relation and download unloaded members, select
> relation members and then zoom to selection is what I did)
>
> I don't know
Looks like the administrative boundary relation for Willits has four separate
unconnected areas.
(Right click on the boundary relation and download unloaded members, select
relation members and then zoom to selection is what I did)
I don't know enough about Willits to know if this is correct or
On 1/26/14 12:40 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
> On 1/26/14 12:36 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
>> I'm doing a bit of mapping in Willits, CA - and a quick search of
>> Willits, CA in OSM returns this lonely polygon in the middle of,
>> pretty much, nowhere:
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/39.381
On 1/26/14 12:36 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> I'm doing a bit of mapping in Willits, CA - and a quick search of
> Willits, CA in OSM returns this lonely polygon in the middle of,
> pretty much, nowhere:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/39.38187/-123.30127
>
> According to JOSM, it is a memb
I'm doing a bit of mapping in Willits, CA - and a quick search of
Willits, CA in OSM returns this lonely polygon in the middle of, pretty
much, nowhere:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/39.38187/-123.30127
According to JOSM, it is a member of a larger membership - but I'm not
sure how to
14 matches
Mail list logo
