>
> > Yep, looks like the USGS server is throwing 500's for the endpoints that
> I
> > was using. We'll have to wait for them to fix it, I suppose.
> > Bummer. MSR (aka Terraserver from way back) also seems to be down.
>
Try the NRL Geospatial Computing Tile Server at the Geospatial Computing
Sect
On 2014-07-03 7:13 PM, Bill R. WASHBURN wrote:
I like how clearly you explain the differences. Since destination= is
so much more intuitive and so much more widely used, should we
depreciate exit_to, indicate on the wiki that exit_to is depreciated,
and make a concerted effort to migrate exit_
I like how clearly you explain the differences. Since destination= is so
much more intuitive and so much more widely used, should we depreciate
exit_to, indicate on the wiki that exit_to is depreciated, and make a
concerted effort to migrate exit_to exits to destination= exits?
I'm not sure how th
I explained it in a diary entry - feel free to comment there or here.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/22419
--
Martijn van Exel
http://oegeo.wordpress.com/
http://openstreetmap.us/
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http
Thanks for the input, Jason and others. I will work on this and should
have something up next week.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Jason Remillard
wrote:
> Hi Martijn,
>
> I think it would be fine to put a scout section into the routing tag page.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_
We should also put it on the calendar: http://openstreetmap.us/calendar/
I don't remember the credentials / address for that calendar right
now, ccing the board to make sure this event gets listed there!
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Patrick Maynard
wrote:
> A half dozen people have expressed
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
> Yep, looks like the USGS server is throwing 500's for the endpoints that I
> was using.
>
> We'll have to wait for them to fix it, I suppose.
Bummer. MSR (aka Terraserver from way back) also seems to be down.
The only luck I've had lately for rec
Hi Martijn,
I think it would be fine to put a scout section into the routing tag page.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing
It should not be much text to describe what tags are used.
Also, following the rest of this thread, the track/surface/etc tagging
situation is very con
A half dozen people have expressed interest to me in a mapping party here
in Baltimore. Here are some details:
We meet at 11 a.m. at the Patterson Park Pakoda. Rain date TBA (so *please
let me know* if you want to be individually placed on the contacts list).
Since I'm hoping for a lot
Yep, looks like the USGS server is throwing 500's for the endpoints that I
was using.
We'll have to wait for them to fix it, I suppose.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
> I rebooted the caching server but it looks like the USGS server is having
> a real hard time. I will look in
On 7/3/14 2:32 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Kevin Broderick
> wrote:
>> Highway=service implies a private road, though;
>
> Not always, service=alley can be public, can't they?
>
i'd say that most alleys i see are public. for obvious reasons they
are little used
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Jason Remillard
wrote:
> Playing around with scout, I have discovered that it will not route
> over tracks, cycleways, and paths unless you are in pedestrian mode.
> It ignores access=destination, and the surface tag.
Scout does not route cars over cycleways and p
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Kevin Broderick
wrote:
> Highway=service implies a private road, though;
Not always, service=alley can be public, can't they?
--
Martijn van Exel
http://oegeo.wordpress.com/
http://openstreetmap.us/
___
Talk-us mail
I rebooted the caching server but it looks like the USGS server is having a
real hard time. I will look in more detail later.
On Jul 2, 2014 10:33 PM, "Chris Lawrence" wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Phil! Gold wrote:
> > If it helps, OSM-US hosts a tile proxy for the USGS-hosted NAIP
Not necessarily. The case I tend to run into, these are extremely rural
roads suitable only as a last resort (or for recreational rat runs across
The Big Empty) and tend to be prone to irregular maintenance, unevenly
graded, do not have snow removal, may have fords, variable in width and
tend to b
2014-07-03 18:26 GMT+02:00 Kevin Broderick :
> Highway=service implies a private road, though;
AFAIK only some service like service=driveway are generally private=yes,
while parking _aisle, alley or generic service might be public roads.
cheers,
Martin
_
I think highway=service could be public or private, just a matter of if it
is "used to access a certain building / facility" like Martin said. Some
public examples could be road to a public parking lot, driveway in/out of
fire station, road leading to a public works facility.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014
Highway=service implies a private road, though; if a public road dead-ends
at a single building or facility, it should be =residential or
=unclassified, right?
The tracktype= key is also not really applicable to many of the
unmaintained roads around here, at least as described on the wiki. The
des
2014-07-03 17:36 GMT+02:00 Brad Neuhauser :
> Just trying to process this: wouldn't a tracktype 1 be tagged as
> unclassified or residential anyway? Or to ask a different way, assuming
> that roads with houses should be tagged as residential, when should one tag
> a sub-tertiary road as track vs.
Just trying to process this: wouldn't a tracktype 1 be tagged as
unclassified or residential anyway? Or to ask a different way, assuming
that roads with houses should be tagged as residential, when should one tag
a sub-tertiary road as track vs. using unclassified?
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:21 AM
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
> For tracks, tracktype indicates condition, and tracktype1 should be
> drivable by any family sedan as it may even be paved.
This.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.ope
21 matches
Mail list logo
