On 8/29/2014 9:41 PM, Russ Nelson wrote:
And then I can point you to oddly connected roads, and a
lack of buildings, or new buildings.
Those things should certainly be mapped, but there are other projects to
put historical data.
___
Talk-us mailing
Russ Nelson wrote:
I fear that the deletionism infection has jumped from Wikipedia
to OpenStreetMap.
...is exactly what I was going to say.
Seriously, OSM in the US, outside a few cities, is still way beyond broken.
You can open it at any random location and the map is just fictional. (I
did,
On 8/30/2014 4:33 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Seriously, OSM in the US, outside a few cities, is still way beyond broken.
You can open it at any random location and the map is just fictional. (I
did, just now:http://www.osm.org/edit#map=13/36.1938/-103.6446 .
Landing on the high plains
Il giorno 30/ago/2014, alle ore 10:33, Richard Fairhurst
rich...@systemed.net ha scritto:
Russ Nelson wrote:
I fear that the deletionism infection has jumped from Wikipedia
to OpenStreetMap.
...is exactly what I was going to say.
Seriously, OSM in the US, outside a few cities, is
Paul Norman writes:
On 8/29/2014 9:41 PM, Russ Nelson wrote:
And then I can point you to oddly connected roads, and a
lack of buildings, or new buildings.
Those things should certainly be mapped, but there are other projects to
put historical data.
Don't render them, then. Oh, wait,
OK, I believe everyone has made their point here. Let’s leave it at this, or
take it offline.
—
Martijn van Exel
President, OpenStreetMap U.S. Chapter
http://openstreetmap.us/
@openstreetmapus
Elections for the 2014-2015 board Oct 4-12 - consider running for a board seat!
From: Russ
Good point. I’ll see about updating the JOSM layer, I am not sure the iD one
uses the same imagery actually.
—
Martijn van Exel
From: Hans De Kryger hans.dekryge...@gmail.com
Reply: Hans De Kryger hans.dekryge...@gmail.com
Date: August 29, 2014 at 11:45:40 PM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Mike N writes:
On 8/30/2014 4:33 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Seriously, OSM in the US, outside a few cities, is still way beyond broken.
You can open it at any random location and the map is just fictional. (I
did, just now:http://www.osm.org/edit#map=13/36.1938/-103.6446 .
Mike N. wrote:
Landing on the high plains desert in the west does not make a
good case that OSM in the US is broken. Desert imagery cues
do not match those of conventional climates.
I really wish I could agree with you, Mike, but my experience is that ~75%
of the US landmass is like that.
iD mostly uses https://github.com/osmlab/editor-imagery-index
So if it is added as a layer there, it can be made available in iD very easily.
So I think tiles need to be generated and the source needs to be added here:
Hi. Let's stop this thread here, please.
Thanks,
Your friendly list admin
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
Landing on the high plains desert in the west does not make a good case
that OSM in the US is broken. Desert imagery cues do not match those of
conventional climates. Those roads likely do exist, but are barely
visible in
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
NO! We would *still* classify them as tracks! Because there's no good
reason to classify them as more major, given consistency. We're trying to
* not* break the routers, after all. Yes, I realize that the vast
13 matches
Mail list logo
