Re: [Talk-us] Potential data source: New York City watershed recreation lands

Hi, On 05/23/2016 05:35 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote: > One-line summary: I want to import the boundaries of New York City > watershed recreation areas. I've read through your proposal and I would like to know if the boundaries you speak of are observable on the ground. I know there won't be a line or f

Re: [Talk-us] Potential data source: New York City watershed recreation lands

On 05/23/2016 03:20 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: On 05/23/2016 05:35 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote: One-line summary: I want to import the boundaries of New York City watershed recreation areas. I've read through your proposal and I would like to know if the boundaries you speak of are observable on the gr

Re: [Talk-us] Restoring bus routes in Portland

> I've fixed all of the relations that had their contents replaced wholesale > by restoring to the last known good version and then adjusting as necessary > to match the current data. The one change to my method was to download all > of the relation members after I load the prior version from a .o

[Talk-us] Odd road / odd structure

Hi all, I have two things that I just don't quite know how to map. Sorry that I have to provide Google Maps views to demonstrate. 1) How does one represent a named street which is really a greenbelt: never been drivable, was assigned a name just to allow attaching a street name to the

Re: [Talk-us] Odd road / odd structure

For Paisley Place, maybe: abandoned:highway = residential access = no name = Paisley Place note = Your description of what the GIS people say. Since it needs to exist for addresses, it needs to be there. For the reservoir: landuse = reservoir intermittent = yes -- Typos courtesy of fan

Re: [Talk-us] Odd road / odd structure

Hi Steve, It looks like there is garage access, so I would tag it highway=service, possibly with an appropriate access= tag if access is restricted. https://bit.ly/1WNyjdd If you are referring to the foot access to the west of that, I’d do highway=footway (perhaps wit

[Talk-us] 'Honorary' street name conflicts with posted name - how to decide

Salt Lake City just renamed a part of 900 South to ‘Harvey Milk Boulevard’. This is a so-called ‘honorary designation’. But now I see a conflict. 1) The common tagging practice is that posted names rule. The signs changed to show the new honorary name: https://goo.gl/photos/xqAxQCwCmPRUGWkm9 <

Re: [Talk-us] 'Honorary' street name conflicts with posted name - how to decide

I concur. You could also put Harvey as an alt_name tag. -- Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology On May 23, 2016 1:03:15 PM EDT, Martijn van Exel wrote: >Salt Lake City just renamed a part of 900 South to ‘Harvey Milk >Boulevard’. This is a so-called ‘honorary designation’. But now I

Re: [Talk-us] Talk-us Digest, Vol 102, Issue 38

> --- > > Stephen J Friedl | Security Consultant | UNIX Wizard | 714 345-4571 > > st...@unixwiz.net <mailto:st...@unixwiz.net> | Southern California | > Windows Guy | unixwiz.net <http://unixwiz.net/> > > > > _

Re: [Talk-us] 'Honorary' street name conflicts with posted name - how to decide

I like to confirm street names by checking for POIs along the street. There's a Great Clips hair salon near there with the following address (see http://www.greatclips.com/ ): 906 E 900 S Salt Lake City, UT 84105 I would put the following addr:* tags on that business: addr:housenumber=906 addr:st

Re: [Talk-us] TopOSM

Hi Kevin, On 05/22/2016 11:26 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote: Alas, I'm not going to SOTM, but put me down as someone who's interested in the project, with some 'skin in the game' already. As I already posted privately to Clifford: I picked up TopOSM's code for my own purposes and added quite a few t