Re: [Talk-us] Best practice in Lane Editing

I thought the "standard" was to put the exit and entrance nodes at the place where there is no physical barrier. Continuous white lines should be mapped with change:lanes and should have no impact on the position of the node. So definitely position "2". IMHO This is illustrated by the picture on

Re: [Talk-us] Last word on named driveways

On 4/22/17 4:18 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > Given the inconsistency of TIGER data, I would not be surprised if no > automated effort will be ever attempted to deal with that dataset ever > again. That said, there are tilesets out there that show TIGER data > that thas a newer name or geometry

Re: [Talk-us] Best practice in Lane Editing

On 2017.04.25. 12:19, Horea Meleg wrote: > Hy guys, thanks for your responses. > Do you think that is better to move motorway_junction where continuous line > begins? In real life you can't cross a continuous line, so I think it should > be the same in OSM. What do you think? i'd probably go

Re: [Talk-us] Best practice in Lane Editing

Hy guys, thanks for your responses. Do you think that is better to move motorway_junction where continuous line begins? In real life you can't cross a continuous line, so I think it should be the same in OSM. What do you think? Thanks, Horea -Original Message- From: Rihards

Re: [Talk-us] Fixing Multipolygons

Hi! On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 02:19:25PM -0400, Kevin Kenny wrote: > How current is the information behind your map? I've been tidying some > multipolygons locally, and they seem to be rendering only on the left side. > I don't think I've actually broken anything. If it might be more than a >

Re: [Talk-us] Best practice in Lane Editing

On 2017.04.25. 09:50, Hans De Kryger wrote: > The motorway link should be dropped down to 2 where the lane actually starts between 1 & 2 for sure. > *Regards,** > * > > *Hans* > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Horea Meleg > wrote: