On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
>> I'd also suggest that leaving tiger:reviewed at no is appropriate if you
>> haven't been able to travel the road/track in question and determine whether
>> it is really an unclassified road or a track, so it remains
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Kevin Broderick
wrote:
> ...
> Downgrading some ways to tracks without doing so to a whole localized
> network creates the appearance of a higher level of data accuracy than
> actually exists, which IMO is more likely to bite someone in
> Map to visualize what each file contains:
> http://daveh.dev.openstreetmap.org/garmin/Lambertus/2018-02-10/kml/kml.html
Map is not loading for me in either Chrome or FF. (Nor Chromium).
"Loading data, please wait :spinner:"
(Previously I have not used these maps because the half-gig files
I've been leaving all the TIGER tags and just changing reviewed from no to
yes
The main reason I've been leaving them is I don't know who might want to make
use of that information.
-jack
--
Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology
On February 13, 2018 5:13:16 AM EST, Mark Wagner
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Brian May wrote:
> ...
>
> Many times, a residential street having no name is a strong tip as well
> that it is not a residential street.
>
> Kevin, I hear where you are coming from, but I think your case is somewhat
> unique. Most people
On Feb 12, 2018 19:24, "Brian May" wrote:
Kevin, I hear where you are coming from, but I think your case is somewhat
unique. Most people aren't going to look at a GPS with OSM data in it, see
a bunch of residential roads in a rural un-populated area and think, OK,
that must be
I do a lot of mapping in Alaska and the quality of the Tiger roads in rural
Alaska is simply horrendous. For some of the small communities I've worked
on the Tiger ways are so far out of position I simply delete them and start
fresh. There is no way to know where they should actually be. The main
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:25:02 -0800
OSM Volunteer stevea wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Tod Fitch wrote:
> > Anyway, what is the current best practice dealing with TIGER tags
> > once the road has been surveyed and corrected? Remove all
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 12:11:29 -0800
OSM Volunteer stevea wrote:
> Remember, after you review tags and alignment of TIGER data, REMOVE
> the tiger:reviewed=no tag, don't change its value to yes.
I don't remove the "tiger:reviewed=no" tag unless I've verified the
name
9 matches
Mail list logo