Re: [Talk-us] Rural US: Correcting Original TIGER Imported Ways

2018-02-13 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: >> I'd also suggest that leaving tiger:reviewed at no is appropriate if you >> haven't been able to travel the road/track in question and determine whether >> it is really an unclassified road or a track, so it remains

Re: [Talk-us] Rural US: Correcting Original TIGER Imported Ways

2018-02-13 Thread Martijn van Exel
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Kevin Broderick wrote: > ... > Downgrading some ways to tracks without doing so to a whole localized > network creates the appearance of a higher level of data accuracy than > actually exists, which IMO is more likely to bite someone in

Re: [Talk-us] Whole-US Garmin Map update - 2018-02-10

2018-02-13 Thread Bill Ricker
> Map to visualize what each file contains: > http://daveh.dev.openstreetmap.org/garmin/Lambertus/2018-02-10/kml/kml.html Map is not loading for me in either Chrome or FF. (Nor Chromium). "Loading data, please wait :spinner:" (Previously I have not used these maps because the half-gig files

Re: [Talk-us] Rural US: Correcting Original TIGER Imported Ways

2018-02-13 Thread Jack Burke
I've been leaving all the TIGER tags and just changing reviewed from no to yes The main reason I've been leaving them is I don't know who might want to make use of that information. -jack -- Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology On February 13, 2018 5:13:16 AM EST, Mark Wagner

Re: [Talk-us] SPAM-LOW: Re: Rural US: Correcting Original TIGER Imported Ways

2018-02-13 Thread Kevin Broderick
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Brian May wrote: > ... > > Many times, a residential street having no name is a strong tip as well > that it is not a residential street. > > Kevin, I hear where you are coming from, but I think your case is somewhat > unique. Most people

Re: [Talk-us] SPAM-LOW: Re: Rural US: Correcting Original TIGER Imported Ways

2018-02-13 Thread Paul Johnson
On Feb 12, 2018 19:24, "Brian May" wrote: Kevin, I hear where you are coming from, but I think your case is somewhat unique. Most people aren't going to look at a GPS with OSM data in it, see a bunch of residential roads in a rural un-populated area and think, OK, that must be

Re: [Talk-us] SPAM-LOW: Re: Rural US: Correcting Original TIGER Imported Ways

2018-02-13 Thread Dave Swarthout
I do a lot of mapping in Alaska and the quality of the Tiger roads in rural Alaska is simply horrendous. For some of the small communities I've worked on the Tiger ways are so far out of position I simply delete them and start fresh. There is no way to know where they should actually be. The main

Re: [Talk-us] Rural US: Correcting Original TIGER Imported Ways

2018-02-13 Thread Mark Wagner
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:25:02 -0800 OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: > On Feb 12, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Tod Fitch wrote: > > Anyway, what is the current best practice dealing with TIGER tags > > once the road has been surveyed and corrected? Remove all

Re: [Talk-us] Rural US: Correcting Original TIGER Imported Ways

2018-02-13 Thread Mark Wagner
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 12:11:29 -0800 OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: > Remember, after you review tags and alignment of TIGER data, REMOVE > the tiger:reviewed=no tag, don't change its value to yes. I don't remove the "tiger:reviewed=no" tag unless I've verified the name