On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
(Please don't CC me when replying; I get the list, and I don't need two
copies (plus this defeats unsubscribing if someone later wants to leave
the conversation). Please use your mailer's reply-to-list feature or
check
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Chris Lawrence lordsu...@gmail.com wrote:
Now the question is: should I remove the shared nodes (or detach them
in JOSM)
Yes. The roads are not topologically connected at the shared node, so nuke
it.
Karl
___
While GNIS might not be perfectly accurate in geoposition, it is the
authoritative set of geographic names for the US. It contains features
that are on no other map or spatial database.
Until now, anyway. ;-)
Karl
___
Talk-us mailing list
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Theodore Book tb...@libero.it wrote:
I have put the various proposals on the wiki at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_Forest_Service_Data
It seems like the landuse=forest tag has a fair amount of consensus, but
that we are not yet sure how to tag the
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Zeke Farwell ezeki...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah we're getting a little ahead of ourselves with the shields. The first
step is tagging the highways in a standard scheme which would give a
renderer sufficient data to draw shields. Then someone has to actually
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Milenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
I've been trying to get a local ROMA server working and I've run into
an issue with getting osmosis working. I've patched osmosis as per the
instructions on the wiki
in.
-Jeremy
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Karl Newman
*Sent:* Thursday, November 06, 2008 1:16 PM
*To:* Milenko
*Cc:* talk-us@openstreetmap.org
*Subject:* Re: [Talk-us] Weird Osmosis/ROMA/pgsql issue
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Milenko
If you try sidewalk:left=true, it might work. I know someone put some work
into automatically switching tags on way reversal, but I'm not sure if it
went into a plugin or the core.
Karl
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Dale Puch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick test of JOSM = nope
I tried
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Nick Hocking [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Well, #2 would be nice but it would be tricky to detect a collision with
an
existing way. Frankly, because the first TIGER import was done, the number
of completely new ways that would be added in a new import would be
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 11:10 -0700, Karl Newman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone looked at importing the TIGER 2007 data yet? I was
going
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 7:57 AM, Ian Dees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Doug Morrison-Cleary [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Nooo. I live in northern MN and all we have around here are lakes!
I really want them in yesterday grin. Please :-)
Ok I suppose I should have
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Adam Schreiber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Ian Dees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Adam Schreiber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Ian Dees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Tom Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to be camping in Oregon in a week. OSM didn't seem to include any
campsites in that area so I downloaded positions from the USFS and a private
operator and imported them using ogr2ogr, gpsbabel and josm.
The USFS
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Tom Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Richard Weait [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 08:07 -0700, Tom Brown wrote:
I'm going to be camping in Oregon in a week. OSM didn't seem to
include any campsites in that
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 4:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
How do we mark and tag Class II and Class III bike facilities? (I'm not
sure if Class I, II, and III is a California specific designation, or if
this is the standard terminology throughout the US)
Class I is the
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Joseph Scanlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Ian Dees wrote:
make sure that the data is better than the data that was already
imported from TIGER.
The data is quite good and gets updated weekly. So... I don't want to
treat this as a one
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:03 AM, Peter Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I have a few specific questions/observations based on the work I have done
so far.
1) The rail network data in the area seems very fragmentary. It may be
valuable for someone with good local knowledge to
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Alex Mauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I know from the history of OSM unclassified and residential
are basically the same, and they render the same in pretty much every
renderer. I believe it's a historical artifact where residential
pretty much meant
18 matches
Mail list logo
