[forwarding this to talk-us, sent privately in error]
-Original Message-
From: Richie Kennedy
Sent: Saturday, December 1, 2018 1:19 PM
To: Paul Johnson
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Trunk versus motorway
> On Nov 29, 2018, at 8:34 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> Single carriageway grade
On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Paul Johnson wrote
> It would be easier to verify by using forward in the child relations
> exclusively. Then it will validate as a loop, or it won't,
> and the gap becomes immediately apparent. As tagged, most tools (JOSM
> included) won't "get" it.
Regarding the use of child relations for routes, and what to do about
directional roles on beltways, I made some mapping changes to a beltway that
happens to be local to me.
I took the relation for I-435[1] and “cloned” it into 2 new relations in
JOSM[2][3]. I then deleted all ways from the in
I am the editor in question.
The discussion appears to assume that roadway design conveys type. I do not
necessarily agree.
However, I can see where some roads with a high HFCS classification may warrant
a class downgrade. US 24 in Central Kansas obviously connects mainly smaller
towns,
Seeing as how the “official” location of the lower 48’s centroid is in
north-central Kansas, I’d have to dispute your claim that Tulsa is the closest
major metro area. Looks to me that Lincoln, Nebraska would be the closest.
There’s also Wichita, Omaha, Topeka, and Kansas City.
--
I'm a little late to the party here, but I am involved in this question.
I have marked US 169 between Iola and Chanute as Motorway because, although it
is a super-two, it is fully controlled access along this segment. I believe
this is consistent with the way most commercial map-makers would
6 matches
Mail list logo
