I tag landuse=forest on public and private "timber production"
polygons. This includes national forests, yes. It also includes at
least one state demonstration forest I am aware of near me.
I tag landuse=wood on virgin forest as well as second-growth
"forests" or visually woody land. I do s
Sorry, again my take is to go ahead and trace - a little background, I would
like to be able to suggest to fire/all emergency services that OSM is/can be
the best 'situational awareness' tool/map. So although we will be creating
more work to 'fix' - when I started it was a blank white area with ho
To clarify, my question was not around what tags to use for the areas with
trees, it was on how to handle the fact that the forest in many cases is
presumably burnt out.
If it weren't for the fire I'd be tracing a lot of natural=wood in the
region.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Taylor
Thank you Harry, no - sorry - the landuse was mainly me; afterward I can
explain why it's beneficial to mash landuse on the map for response
purposes. Yes, it will need cleaned up and Murry and others are making good
progress.
=Russ
From: Harry Wood [mailto:m...@harrywood.co.uk]
Sent: Friday
Here's a wiki page for coordination. Please feel free to edit
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Black_Forest_Fire_2013
Eugghh! The landuse data around here is a mess. Government data import I
presume On the plus side. There's plenty to get stuck in and work on. I
recommend JOSM for dealing
For areas inside what you can assume is private property, landuse=forest is
what I typically use. 'Managed Forest'? Maybe needs to be a little more.
From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 2:27 AM
To: 'OSM US Talk'
Cc: 'hot'
Subject: Re: [HOT] [Talk-us] Black Fores
6 matches
Mail list logo
