I tag landuse=forest on public and private "timber production" polygons. This includes national forests, yes. It also includes at least one state demonstration forest I am aware of near me.

I tag landuse=wood on virgin forest as well as second-growth "forests" or visually woody land. I do so widely on polygons which display from visual observation (including satellite and aerial imagery) as "largely trees, essentially undisturbed woodland areas." I have superimposed meadows (small, medium and large) on top of these, to visually pleasing effect (in mapnik and other renderers alike). Scattering among these are "what can be observed" which sometimes become an OSM sketch of a building, road or the odd water tower.

I have only today added two tags on some of the only essentially undeveloped (but surrounded) parcels in my city from landuse=residential to ALSO include a natural=wood tag. I'm OK with this (and admittedly, visually prefer the way mapnik tips towards a woody-green render). Call me guilty for coding for the renderer, but both tags are observably true.

I'm not OK with changing the landuse=residential (it is so zoned, but not actively used) to landuse=greenfield but I am OK with that if/when/as a permit to develop gets approved at the City Council level. (Then it might properly get changed to landuse=construction and then again beyond that).

I am not sure about the temporal aspects of how I use the map as distinct with how those dynamics are likely different in the context of HOT mapping. It seems OSM just experienced a slight muddying in Colorado.

It's a plastic map, and it does bend and even break when certain basics aren't followed. "Basics" might mean certain things to certain people, but (HOT) beginners might get it mostly right. Making mistakes on a smaller scale is how some of us learn, making mistakes on a larger scale, while we can tolerate some of, should be prevented if it can be.

SteveA
California

_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to