Just a random observation: containment in a state does not necessarily
mean that a 'state highway' is a state highway of that state.
There are a few spots in the Alleganies where NY-17 veers into
Pennsylvania to avoid a mountain or river. It's still maintained by
NYSDOT and signed with a New
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Kevin Kenny kken...@nycap.rr.com wrote:
Just a random observation: containment in a state does not necessarily
mean that a 'state highway' is a state highway of that state.
There are a few spots in the Alleganies where NY-17 veers into
Pennsylvania to avoid a
On 2012-09-12 7:14 PM, Clay Smalley wrote:
It was mainly NE2 that went around changing everything to SR and SH. I'm
pretty sure the consensus has always been the postal abbreviation.
In Ohio, SR 123 is used on blade signage and other places where the
state route shield isn't appropriate. I've
Concerning ref tags on ways, I don't think there's a need to impose
nationwide consistency. I also don't think it's worth even adhering to a
strict machine-parseable syntax (particularly dealing with overlaps) since
that kind of information is much better organized in relations.
That said, here
On 9/12/2012 11:19 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
what i recall is that NE2 likes the appearance of bare route numbers and
most of his ref
tags have no prefix at all (see FL, PA, NJ among other states where he
did a lot of this.)
I've seen a number of people who put the bare number in the ref tag
David,
I agree with much of what you said.
However, I'm not sure why the size of a
state should make a difference in what
abbreviation is used. Large or small, shouldn't
the state abbreviation be consistent?
Also, in the B section, where you
suggest US 1 plus US 9
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:57 AM, David ``Smith'' vidthe...@gmail.com wrote:
Concerning ref tags on ways, I don't think there's a need to impose
nationwide consistency. I also don't think it's worth even adhering to a
strict machine-parseable syntax (particularly dealing with overlaps) since
On 9/13/2012 1:15 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
Most of the ones in Kansas are actually KS XX - might have something
to do with me having done most of them and I consider national
consistency to be of value
I would agree with national consistency. There will always be
contention - in SC, the DOT
On Sep 13, 2012 11:51 AM, Charlotte Wolter techl...@techlady.com wrote:
David,
I agree with much of what you said.
However, I'm not sure why the size of a state should make a
difference in what abbreviation is used. Large or small, shouldn't the
state abbreviation be
Hello all,
Was there ever consensus on whether to use SR (or some
variation on that) for state highways versus an abbreviation of the
state name (CA or NY). I remember that there was discussion, but
I don't remember if there was consensus.
Thanks.
Charlotte
Charlotte
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Charlotte Wolter techl...@techlady.comwrote:
**Was there ever consensus on whether to use SR (or some
variation on that) for state highways versus an abbreviation of the state
name (CA or NY). I remember that there was discussion, but I don't
remember
Charlotte Wolter wrote:
Hello all,
Was there ever consensus on whether to use SR (or some
variation on that) for state highways versus an abbreviation of the
state name (CA or NY). I remember that there was discussion, but
I don't remember if there was consensus.
Thanks.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Charlotte Wolter
techl...@techlady.comwrote:
**Was there ever consensus on whether to use SR (or some
variation on that) for state highways versus an abbreviation
It was mainly NE2 that went around changing everything to SR and SH. I'm
pretty sure the consensus has always been the postal abbreviation.
On Sep 12, 2012 8:31 PM, Kristian M Zoerhoff k...@lavabit.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org
Maybe we should allow NE2 back in here so he can also comment on this. Also, as
far as I know, he had nothing to do with any SR tags in California, but I'm
not 100% sure. --James ___
Talk-us mailing list
On 9/12/12 11:05 PM, James Mast wrote:
Maybe we should allow NE2 back in here so he can also comment on this.
Also, as far as I know, he had nothing to do with any SR tags in
California, but I'm not 100% sure.
what i recall is that NE2 likes the appearance of bare route numbers and
most of
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote:
what i recall is that NE2 likes the appearance of bare route numbers and
most of his ref
tags have no prefix at all (see FL, PA, NJ among other states where he did
a lot of this.)
this was, of course, tagging for
On 9/12/12 11:24 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Richard Welty
rwe...@averillpark.net mailto:rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
what i recall is that NE2 likes the appearance of bare route
numbers and most of his ref
tags have no prefix at all (see FL, PA,
18 matches
Mail list logo
