There has been a recent push to improve the coverage of exit numbers and
destination signs on the motorways in the US by the data team at Mapbox.
Some context here [1][2][3][4]. The primary sources of data were DoT
documents and Mapillary images. The secondary source was Wikipedia, but as
per the c
I'm wondering why the push to tag a node with directional information when
tagging the first segment of the diverging way would be more concise and
already had support in some navigational data consumers? This handles
weird situations where ramps diverge to the left or from a lane other than
the e
Hi Paul,
These are good points, but it does not look like the `junction:ref` tagging
scheme is very common. Till there is widespread usage by the community we
will continue to follow the conventional tagging of the reference numbers
on the motorway_junction node [1].
Curious to know what the othe
Hey all,
I believe the way-junction:ref should be used in addition to the node-ref
only when needed at splits - like this example:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Exit_Info#A.2FB_Split_Example
These types of splits do not happen very often - however, when they do -
having the way-junction:ref h
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 2:46 AM, Jinal Foflia wrote:
> There has been a recent push to improve the coverage of exit numbers and
> destination signs on the motorways in the US by the data team at Mapbox.
> Some context here [1][2][3][4]. The primary sources of data were DoT
> documents and Mapillar
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Greg Morgan wrote:
>
>
> The work flow that you mention drive me batty.[0] At one time there was a
> discussion on the list about moving exit_to tags as destination tags on the
> ramp. I moved most of the exit_to tags that I mapped to the ramps. Here
> you are p
On 5/4/2016 4:18 AM, Greg Morgan wrote:
At one time there was a discussion on the list about moving exit_to
tags as destination tags on the ramp. I moved most of the exit_to tags
that I mapped to the ramps. Here you are proposing something different
by leaving some exit_to tags and adding dest
So, I am confused here. What Paul is talking about, isn't that what is
being proposed (besides the junction:ref bit)? This is a proposal to use
the node and way approach, like the one Duane points too, right?
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:31 AM Duane Gearhart wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I believe the way
8 matches
Mail list logo