Re: [Talk-us] Mapping traffic signals and stop signs using MapRoulette

2017-06-14 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Marc Gemis wrote: > But since there is no proposal for a relation, I cannot use > it. > Someone want to help with that? ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-us] Mapping traffic signals and stop signs using MapRoulette

2017-06-13 Thread Marc Gemis
I don't understand your roundabouts example. The give way before the roundabout can be mapped on the road entering the roundabout, not ? What's different from another road with a give way sign ? That the roundabout is a one-way road ? Perhaps the rules for give way signs before roundabouts are

Re: [Talk-us] Mapping traffic signals and stop signs using MapRoulette

2017-06-13 Thread Marc Gemis
As I asked you before, show me a real world case where you have to map a give way sign on the intersection of more than 1 OSM way. After mapping several hundreds of them in Belgium, I have never seen a case where it is needed. But I'm willing to map relations as well, but then someone has to make

Re: [Talk-us] Mapping traffic signals and stop signs using MapRoulette

2017-06-13 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Marc Gemis wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Paul Johnson > wrote: > > How does it not? A node doesn't infer a way that it's attached to, > though a > > node may infer what nodes it crosses through. This is

Re: [Talk-us] Mapping traffic signals and stop signs using MapRoulette

2017-06-13 Thread Marc Gemis
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > How does it not? A node doesn't infer a way that it's attached to, though a > node may infer what nodes it crosses through. This is why relations became > a thing, to model things that can't be inferred from the other

Re: [Talk-us] Mapping traffic signals and stop signs using MapRoulette

2017-06-13 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Paul Johnson > wrote: > >> So we're ignoring that nodes don't inherit the directionality of the >> underlying way? Really sounds like you're trying to

Re: [Talk-us] Mapping traffic signals and stop signs using MapRoulette

2017-06-12 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > So we're ignoring that nodes don't inherit the directionality of the > underlying way? Really sounds like you're trying to suggest using > direction=forward/backwards when a relation is what's actually needed. > There

Re: [Talk-us] Mapping traffic signals and stop signs using MapRoulette

2017-06-12 Thread Paul Johnson
So we're ignoring that nodes don't inherit the directionality of the underlying way? Really sounds like you're trying to suggest using direction=forward/backwards when a relation is what's actually needed. On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Horea Meleg wrote: > Hi all, >

[Talk-us] Mapping traffic signals and stop signs using MapRoulette

2017-06-12 Thread Horea Meleg
Hi all, Me and my Telenav colleagues found useful open source data for Wayne County regarding traffic signals and stop signs. We made a blogpost about this: http://blog.improve-osm.org/en/2017/06/mapping-traffic-signals-and-stop-signs-using-maproulette/ and created two MapRoulette challenges to