Re: [Talk-us] Reply-to field in list messages

2010-06-29 Thread Bill Ricker
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Mike N. wrote: > Actually I inadvertently published a private email when I first joined > because it was not set up to reply to the list. I saw the weirdness, and > thought it was like another list which had a dead reply-to address and got > in the habit of manu

Re: [Talk-us] Reply-to field in list messages

2010-06-29 Thread Mike N.
> header. It would save nearly everybody from occasional frustration > and frequent minor annoyance. Instead, people would inadvertantly publish private email. Actually I inadvertently published a private email when I first joined because it was not set up to reply to the list. I saw the we

Re: [Talk-us] Reply-to field in list messages

2010-06-28 Thread Nathan Edgars II
What's stupid is that it's set up differently for different OSM lists. Tagging and apparently newbies use reply-to, while talk and talk-us don't. I don't really care which way it is, but make it consistent across lists. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@o

Re: [Talk-us] Reply-to field in list messages

2010-06-28 Thread Bill Ricker
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html > > And then please let this topic go away. +1 -- Bill n1...@arrl.net bill.n1...@gmail.com __

Re: [Talk-us] Reply-to field in list messages

2010-06-28 Thread Russ Nelson
David ``Smith'' writes: > Why doesn't the talk-us list use the "reply-to" field so that simple > replies go to the list, not just the original poster? The newbies > list does that. Every other e-mail list I've ever been on does that. > So why not this one? http://russnelson.com/rt.html > h

[Talk-us] Reply-to field in list messages

2010-06-10 Thread David ``Smith''
Why doesn't the talk-us list use the "reply-to" field so that simple replies go to the list, not just the original poster? The newbies list does that. Every other e-mail list I've ever been on does that. So why not this one? I know I can hit "reply-all" instead of "reply" but that still requires

Re: [Talk-us] Reply-to field in list messages

2010-06-10 Thread Dave Hansen
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 16:59 -0400, David ``Smith'' wrote: > Why doesn't the talk-us list use the "reply-to" field so that simple > replies go to the list, not just the original poster? The newbies > list does that. Every other e-mail list I've ever been on does that. > So why not this one? It's

Re: [Talk-us] Reply-to field in list messages

2010-06-10 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:59 PM, David ``Smith'' wrote: > > Why doesn't the talk-us list use the "reply-to" field so that simple > replies go to the list, not just the original poster?  The newbies > list does that.  Every other e-mail list I've ever been on does that. > So why not this one? Plea

Re: [Talk-us] Reply-to field in list messages

2010-06-10 Thread Mike N.
> Please let's not start this discussion here (again probably, I'm not > going to search the archives). This is a religious topic - there's no > "right" answer and discussions rarely result in anything positive. > For reference, please read: A more relevant thread is at http://lists.openstree

Re: [Talk-us] Reply-to?

2009-10-13 Thread Sam Vekemans
try, replying ALL, cc's the talk-us list. There is a setting to make it so that you dont get this message twice, for example. Cheers, Sam On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:06 AM, David ``Smith'' wrote: > Why is it, when I receive messages from this list, they don't come > with a reply-to header so repli

[Talk-us] Reply-to?

2009-10-13 Thread David ``Smith''
Why is it, when I receive messages from this list, they don't come with a reply-to header so replies automatically go back to the list and not individual sender(s)? That would be helpful. The newbies list has such headers. I looked on the list subscription site and I didn't see any settings that