On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 5:27 AM Mike N wrote:
> On 3/1/2019 12:49 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
> >
> > One caution - when doing a building/address import a few years ago, we
> > discovered errors in the counties address database. They had different
> > street names from address street names. The
On 3/1/2019 12:49 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
One caution - when doing a building/address import a few years ago, we
discovered errors in the counties address database. They had different
street names from address street names. The street names matched the
street signs but the addresses had a
On 3/1/2019 10:09 AM, Aaron Forsythe wrote:
>> 1. Original TIGER had Ruppe Dr at a nearby but incorrect location.
This seems a common enough occurrence that a TIGER data should not be
used as permanent source. It's only there to get the map started and
adjustments from TIGER are required.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 7:09 AM Aaron Forsythe wrote:
> These are all just my opinions, so don't take as fact. I could be wrong.
>
>
>
> >> We were able to get a local GIS to release data to OSM. In analyzing
>
> the data, I notice that address tags are much more carefully updated
>
> than road
These are all just my opinions, so don't take as fact. I could be wrong.
>> 1. Original TIGER had Ruppe Dr at a nearby but incorrect location.
This seems a common enough occurrence that a TIGER data should not be used as
permanent source. It's only there to get the map started and
There have been some road name challenge projects which do excellent
work - updating the road network for current changes. In some cases,
there are now dueling sources, for example a recent change -
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/666170175/history
(I don't fault any editor involved;
6 matches
Mail list logo
