Mike N. wrote:
> As one who grew up in a rural area, a country road lined with 4
> houses in a mile would feel "residential" and I would tend to set
> it as residential in OSM. That describes most of the rural parts
> of this county also, except for roads that don't happen to have
> a house.
On 10/22/2018 8:46 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Could I suggest that you act cautiously wrt the tiger:reviewed tag in these
two cases?
If it's an "unknown highway type" it should probably remain as
tiger:reviewed=no. Likewise, if the surface isn't clear, then either
tiger:reviewed should
Mike N. wrote:
> This is a proposed import of road centerlines for Spartanburg County
> SC, based on county GIS data. This will include a systematic review of
> all roads in the county and qualify to remove tiger:reviewed tags.
Looks good!
Browsing through the code and the wiki page, you have:
This is a proposed import of road centerlines for Spartanburg County SC,
based on county GIS data. This will include a systematic review of all
roads in the county and qualify to remove tiger:reviewed tags.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spartanburg_county_road_center_line_import
4 matches
Mail list logo
