On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> i will fix anything that i missed but the lines are truth.
>
> and it is not a polygon,
>
As far as I know, boundary relations have to, in effect, be polygons, in
other words, they have to close.
>
i will fix anything that i missed but the lines are truth.
and it is not a polygon, and i broke nothing i fixed what the other guy broke
and did it all by hand.
>Tuesday, August 18, 2020 7:36 PM -05:00 from James Umbanhowar
>:
>
>I'm going to bow out of this discussion. The boundary
I'm going to bow out of this discussion. The boundary relation is
broken again. I'm not trying to be confrontational, but my attempts to
figure out what sources this user is using and to reconcile this with
what they are editing appear to be antagonizing them. I have also lost
my patience so I
You still aren't giving us very much to go on. There's obviously some
boundary that you consider to be inarguably correct. You need either to
enter the data yourself or tell us where to find it and where the
discrepancies are.
Sometimes that involves quite a lot of research. I have a ton of data
Do you have a more authoritative source for municipal boundaries than the
US Census Bureau?
If you don't, it'll be hard for you to convince everyone here that the US
Census data is wrong.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 5:03 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> FYI;
>
>
FYI;
for all of you who are not in country and do not understand about usa city
bounders.
https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/contact.html
and did you read what the other guy said, this is the census data not true map
data.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89598349
On 18/08/2020 16:43, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us wrote:
i am looking at the TIRGER web, show’s the real map online and
nothing you did matches.
Unfortunately, just saying that does not really help. What URL are you
actually looking at? Under what licence is the data at that URL made
What link are you using for this? I downloaded the places boundary
information from here:
https://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/geo/shapefiles/index.php
As I said, I'm happy to change, but I can't change without actual
information.
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 18:43 +0300, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us wrote:
i am looking at the TIRGER web, show’s the real map online and nothing you did
matches.
i live here and a block away from the edens spur just saying.
>Tuesday, August 18, 2020 10:38 AM -05:00 from James Umbanhowar
>:
>
>It would probably be best if these suggestions were added in the
It would probably be best if these suggestions were added in the
changeset comments, as they don't need to be discussed on the mailing
list.
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 11:36 -0400, James Umbanhowar wrote:
> I'm the person who made the changes and am happy to adjust the map to
> better authoritative
I'm the person who made the changes and am happy to adjust the map to
better authoritative data or information. My motivation for this was
to fix a mangled boundary relation that didn't have consistent outer
and inner members. The changes came in two changesets,
Changeset #89220282
>Monday, August 17, 2020 6:34 PM -05:00 from Mike Thompson
>:
>
>
>On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:24 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
>talk-us@openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>tiger is up to date on the web map using the current data i just think he
>>picked the wrong year,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:24 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> tiger is up to date on the web map using the current data i just think he
> picked the wrong year,
>
That relation was first created in 2009. According to the source tag, it
used 2008 Tiger data, so
tiger is up to date on the web map using the current data i just think he
picked the wrong year,
also all he got was a white line in his first try.
Way: 813726663
Changeset # 89220282
>Monday, August 17, 2020 6:16 PM -05:00 from Mike Thompson
>:
>
>1) Best not to delete and start over as
1) Best not to delete and start over as the history will be lost.
2) Do you have an accurate source that has a license that is compatible
with OSM? Could you share a link to it?
3) General observation is that there is a lot of territory that is not
enclosed by any admin level 8 boundary, which
this is not the current boundary, could be more than 10 years + old,
can’t the whole relation, #126598, northbrook, be deleted and then put back in.
i tried by hand but this is to much to trace.
>Monday, August 17, 2020 4:43 PM -05:00 from Paul Johnson :
>
>On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 4:02
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 4:02 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> can somebody who knows how to use Tiger data fix this ?
>
Fix what??
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
can somebody who knows how to use Tiger data fix this ?
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
18 matches
Mail list logo
