Re: [Talk-us] Requesting to remove stoplines in San Jose

Hey Peter, I'd like to first say I didn't really know what your account was doing when I saw those stop_lines, but I certainly see some value in them now. I hope your company stays engaged and keeps contributing to OpenStreetMap! I think there is more value in having the ways re-tagged than

Re: [Talk-us] Uploading sidewalks in San Jose, California, US

Stevea, Thanks for the comments. I don't think i'll ever be able to say the word "license" again. -Vivek On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:18 AM Minh Nguyen wrote: > On 19/09/2017 23:44, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: > > Vivek Bansal <3viv...@gmail.com> writes: > >> We

[Talk-us] Gathering opinions on organized editing

Hi US / CA mappers, The OSMF Data Working Group is currently conducting a community survey on ‘organized editing’. It would be great if as many of you as possible could give them feedback. You can find the full post and a discussion thread here:

[Talk-us] Requesting to remove stoplines in San Jose

Hello everyone, This being my first post to this list, I hope it has gotten through. As Vivek has mentioned, we have a productive discussion about how best to address the digitization of stoplines and the havoc my approach has wrought upon all of you. First, let me say I am sorry that my initial

Re: [Talk-us] Uploading sidewalks in San Jose, California, US

On 19/09/2017 23:44, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: Vivek Bansal <3viv...@gmail.com> writes: We are using the San Jose data which has an ODbL compliant license (and any government data in California has the same). I'm following the San José discussion and don't wish to get too technically

Re: [Talk-us] Uploading sidewalks in San Jose, California, US

Vivek Bansal <3viv...@gmail.com> writes: > We are using the San Jose data which has an ODbL compliant license (and any > government data in California has the same). I'm following the San José discussion and don't wish to get too technically legal: I am not an attorney, though I have paid