Hey Peter, I'd like to first say I didn't really know what your account was doing when I saw those stop_lines, but I certainly see some value in them now. I hope your company stays engaged and keeps contributing to OpenStreetMap!
I think there is more value in having the ways re-tagged than having them deleted. I think one of the important things is that the road_marking ways should be joined to any relevant intersecting ways (probably highways) with a node (utilsplugin2 should help). -Vivek On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:12 AM peter flier <peterfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This being my first post to this list, I hope it has gotten through. As > Vivek has mentioned, we have a productive discussion about how best to > address the digitization of stoplines and the havoc my approach has wrought > upon all of you. > > First, let me say I am sorry that my initial incursion into the new > feature type was so categorically disruptive to people's workflows. I had > attempted to propose this feature as a free to the public service my > company was going to be providing as a secondary result of our work. I > scoured OSM for a proper feature type that could be used for this purpose > and found nothing that quite lined up (pun intended!), so I proposed my own > and moved forward with it. It was only afterwards that I was informed of > the experimental road_marking feature type which would encompass nearly all > of the stop lines I would be adding. > > If there are no objections to the re-tagging of these ways, I will move > things over in bulk through JOSM and add future stop lines under the > "road_marking= solid_stop_line" pairing. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
