Re: [OSM-talk] ODbl concerns

2023-07-04 Thread Adam Franco
Robert, I applaud the Victoria government for using and collaborating on OSM data! As others have shared I think direct government involvement with and contributions to OSM are a great strategic direction. Here in the USA our federal government is required by law to put all of its publications in

Re: [OSM-talk] ODbl concerns

2023-07-04 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via talk
Jul 3, 2023, 18:08 by marc_m...@mailo.com: > Le 03.07.23 à 16:10, Cj Malone a écrit : > >> On Mon, 2023-07-03 at 00:05 +, Robert C Potter (DTP) via talk >> wrote: >> >>> Google, Tomtom and Apple. >>> >> >> Maybe it's not their preferred license, but they already use odbl data. >> > > for

Re: [OSM-talk] ODbl concerns

2023-07-03 Thread Cj Malone
On Mon, 2023-07-03 at 18:03 +0200, Marc_marc wrote: > Le 03.07.23 à 16:10, Cj Malone a écrit : > > On Mon, 2023-07-03 at 00:05 +, Robert C Potter (DTP) via talk > > wrote: > > > Google, Tomtom and Apple. > > > > Maybe it's not their preferred license, but they already use odbl > > data. > >

Re: [OSM-talk] ODbl concerns

2023-07-03 Thread Hartmut Holzgraefe
On 03.07.23 18:03, Marc_marc wrote: but any reference about "google using ODBl" ? via their Niantec subsidiary for Pocemon Go? ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] ODbl concerns

2023-07-03 Thread Marc_marc
Le 03.07.23 à 16:10, Cj Malone a écrit : On Mon, 2023-07-03 at 00:05 +, Robert C Potter (DTP) via talk wrote: Google, Tomtom and Apple. Maybe it's not their preferred license, but they already use odbl data. for Tomtom and Appel, of course they use it, including osm. but any reference

Re: [OSM-talk] ODbl concerns

2023-07-03 Thread Cj Malone
On Mon, 2023-07-03 at 00:05 +, Robert C Potter (DTP) via talk wrote: > Google, Tomtom and Apple. Maybe it's not their preferred license, but they already use odbl data. CJ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] ODbl concerns

2023-07-02 Thread Andrew Harvey
Hi Robert, To preface, I'm not a lawyer and your should seek your own independent legal advice, but as I understand: 1. the department has made a decision to adopt OSM as your data source, accepting the terms this data is licensed under 2. you will adapt, modify, enhance, correct or extend OSM

Re: [OSM-talk] ODbl concerns

2023-07-02 Thread Greg Troxel
"Robert C Potter (DTP) via talk" writes: > Our intended use of OSM is built on an extract being done then > validating that extract for the gazetted/official place and road > names. The resultant validated dataset will be shared that via our > Opendata portal. Our state government has a strong