[Taps] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-taps-01-00: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-taps-01-00: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along

[Taps] Adam Roach's No Objection on charter-ietf-taps-01-00: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-taps-01-00: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along

[Taps] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on charter-ietf-taps-01-00: (with COMMENT)

Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-taps-01-00: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document,

[Taps] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on charter-ietf-taps-01-00: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-taps-01-00: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along

Re: [Taps] Ben Campbell's No Objection on charter-ietf-taps-01-00: (with COMMENT)

> On Jan 24, 2018, at 8:38 AM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF > wrote: > > Hi, Ben, > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:53 AM, Mirja Kühlewind wrote: > Hi Ben, > > this change rather removed the restriction to not analyze features of > security

Re: [Taps] Ben Campbell's No Objection on charter-ietf-taps-01-00: (with COMMENT)

> On Jan 24, 2018, at 3:53 AM, Mirja Kühlewind wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > this change rather removed the restriction to not analyze features of > security protocols (other than tcpinc); this is mainly the first sentence. As > we see a closer integration of TLS with QUIC and

Re: [Taps] Ben Campbell's No Objection on charter-ietf-taps-01-00: (with COMMENT)

Hi, Ben, On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:53 AM, Mirja Kühlewind wrote: > Hi Ben, > > this change rather removed the restriction to not analyze features of > security protocols (other than tcpinc); this is mainly the first sentence. > As we see a closer integration of TLS with

Re: [Taps] Ben Campbell's No Objection on charter-ietf-taps-01-00: (with COMMENT)

Hi Ben, this change rather removed the restriction to not analyze features of security protocols (other than tcpinc); this is mainly the first sentence. As we see a closer integration of TLS with QUIC and we in general think that security features are important, it is actually an important