Hi Ben,
this change rather removed the restriction to not analyze features of
security protocols (other than tcpinc); this is mainly the first
sentence. As we see a closer integration of TLS with QUIC and we in
general think that security features are important, it is actually an
important change to allow us to do some additional work in this space.
Mirja
On 24.01.2018 04:42, Ben Campbell wrote:
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-taps-01-00: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-taps/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do I read correctly that the only change from the previous charter is to remove
the paragraph about coordinating with TCPINC? If so, I'm not sure that change
is important enough to justify rechartering, but I won't get in the way if
other people agree with it.
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
Taps@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
