Re: [Taps] Transport Services (taps) WG Virtual Meeting: 2022-09-26

2022-09-19 Thread Jon Crowcroft
folks in TAPS might be interested in this https://www.usenix.org/publications/loginonline/transcending-posix-end-era ___ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Re: [Taps] tapping taps talent for teaching?

2022-09-13 Thread Jon Crowcroft
shop on 5G Measurements, Modeling, and Use > Cases (5G-MeMU '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, > USA, 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472771.3472775 > https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3472771.3472775 > > > Cheers, > Michael > > > > >

[Taps] tapping taps talent for teaching?

2022-09-13 Thread Jon Crowcroft
i'm just updating a seminar course i run for masters/1styr PhD students in cambridge and i suddenly realized I have no material on TAPS at all which seems like a missed opportunity... i think i saw an email on this list that someone had been developing materials for teachign (thoguh I think it wa

Re: [Taps] DTN & TAPS

2021-04-26 Thread Jon Crowcroft
not exactly DTN, but opportunsitic networks, as envisaged in Haggle had pluggable protocols at most layers - Haggle: Seamless Networking for Mobile Applications https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/haggle-ubicomp2007.pdf DTN is also sometimes interpreted as "Disrup

Re: [Taps] conflicting policies

2018-03-21 Thread Jon Crowcroft
for historical perspective, this is similar to the problem of "feature interaction" in old private phone exchanges 30 years back - its (in general) quite a hard problem if you can't just order all the preferences... On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:34 AM, Roni Even (A) wrote: > Hi, > > I made this com

Re: [Taps] call for agenda items

2017-10-25 Thread Jon Crowcroft
just one comment - this is confusing to people who care about race conditions in connection establishment protocols - you need to disambiguate competing (greedy parallel exploration of options) from "racing" somewhere in the doc:, i think:) On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Tommy Pauly wrote: > I

Re: [Taps] TCP components

2015-06-20 Thread Jon Crowcroft
i dont have any spare time to do it, but maybe someone could have a go at analyzing all the different TCP offload techniques, which would give another lens to view this through... On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Michael Welzl wrote: > > > On 20. jun. 2015, at 00.55, Joe Touch wrote: > > > > >

Re: [Taps] A proposal to throw out RTP

2015-06-03 Thread Jon Crowcroft
+1 Don't ignore, but dont actively work on... On 3 Jun 2015 11:04, "Brian Trammell" wrote: > > > On 03 Jun 2015, at 16:48, go...@erg.abdn.ac.uk wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I know this has been discussed before, but only briefly. I have two > >> arguments that I'd like to bring forward towards r

[Taps] quic

2015-03-21 Thread Jon Crowcroft
standalone, if anyone wants to experiment https://github.com/devsisters/libquic ___ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Re: [Taps] Stream vs. packet

2014-07-11 Thread Jon Crowcroft
yep - prob best work on this to date is bryan ford's structured streams stuff (in sigcomm 2007) http://www.brynosaurus.com/pub/net/sst-abs.html On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote: > This discussion is as old as TCP. One can build a message interface on a > stream interfac