-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Boris,
--->>> Boris Golberg / Mittwoch 16.01.2002, 03:25:45
Shortcut (Alt-F12)
> Do you have "intpack" installed?
Yes! But now it's fine.
The problem why it didn't work was mentioned yesterday by Carsten
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Pe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Good morning everybody,
--->>> Boris Golberg / Dienstag 15.01.2002, 22:58:40
1.54 Beta/28
> Did you try to delete shortcut.cfg? Just a guess.
What folder is shortcut.cfg? I've made a search on the whole HD and
didn't find this file!
-
Hello Boris,
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 15:58:40 -0600GMT (16/01/2002, 05:58 +0800GMT),
Boris Golberg wrote:
MM>>> 5) There should be an option "Reset to default" in Shortcuts Editor
MM>>> to remove all new shortcuts and set TB's default shortcuts only.
TF>> I second this.
BG> Did you try to delete
Hello Boris,
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 19:12:09 -0600GMT (16/01/2002, 09:12 +0800GMT),
Boris Golberg wrote:
BG> Confirmed. As people said before, there is a *package* CC bugs. It
BG> happens if connection is unstable (dial-up). Developers probably
BG> don't use dial-up (specially *bad* dial-up) a lot.
Hello Jacek,
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:00:15 +0100GMT (15/01/2002, 23:00 +0800GMT),
Jacek Wojaczynski wrote:
>> [x] Remind me of compressing all folders
>> [x] Every [__] days
>> [x] If folder wasn't compressed the last [__] days
JW> Very good idea.
Right after all bugs are fixed, the GUI
Hello Mrten,
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 15:20:36 +0100GMT (15/01/2002, 22:20 +0800GMT),
Mrten wrote:
M> aren't users supposed to read the FM? :)
Yes. ;-)
M> perhaps message bases should be compressed by default at program
M> shutdown (if it saves > 100 K bytes or such, like Mozilla does).
No. I have
Hello,
14 Jan 2002, 4:20:22 AM, Eddie Castelli wrote:
EC> -b- Main Menu|Option|Language (in the shortcut table) shows all
EC> Language possible/installed on TB!.
EC> Looking at the (real)Menu|Option I can't find the Language item.
Do you have "intpack" installed?
--
Best regar
Hi,
in accordance with RFC-2392 I suggest that the currently working link
"msgid:" should be changed to "mid:"; (see also
"ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2392.txt";).
Regards,
Markus
--
This signature intentionally says nothing.
Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/26 under Windows NT 4.0 Build
1381 Servic
Hi Mrten,
>> I agree with any dialog, which appears to user for compressing. I have
>> big FAQ to users on pages and in help file, but still many and many
>> users asks me, why is their msgbase too big.
M> aren't users supposed to read the FM? :) perhaps message bases should be
M> compressed by
On 15 January 2002 at 2:37 pm Silviu wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 15 Jan 2002 at 4:37:01 pm ,
> Alastair Scott wrote the following
> on the "SOT: TB! memory leaks (?) and pinning them down" thread:
AS>> Since I installed beta 28 on my Win95 machine its performance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
15 Jan 2002 at 4:37:01 pm ,
Alastair Scott wrote the following
on the "SOT: TB! memory leaks (?) and pinning them down" thread:
AS> Since I installed beta 28 on my Win95 machine its performance has been
AS> deplorable; I'm beginning to think there's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Om 15:06 op dinsdag 15 januari 2002, Marek Mikus:
> I agree with any dialog, which appears to user for compressing. I have
> big FAQ to users on pages and in help file, but still many and many
> users asks me, why is their msgbase too big.
aren't us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Om 15:01 op dinsdag 15 januari 2002, Markus Gloede:
> Well, but what behavior would you like when one of the two messages gets
> deleted? A message is an entity, including the attachment, even if there
> is a different message (different overall hash
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, [ISO-8859-1] Carsten Thönges wrote:
> There are some features I would like to see in your program:
>
> There should be dialog boxes in TB! asking the user:
>
>
> | You haven't compressed your folders for n days/weeks. Do you want
> | to compress all your folders now?
Hi,
Anton I. Danilov wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
> I personally dislike TB's habit to duplicate attachments when they're
> the same files and attached to different letters... It also could be
> solved and it could save much diskspace, at least in my case, it would
> save up to 50% of the
Hello The Bat! developers,
I'm using The Bat! Version 1.54 Beta/28
Serial Number B5770FAF
under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2.
There are some features I would like to see in your program:
There should be dialog boxes in TB! asking the user:
| You haven't compressed your
Since I installed beta 28 on my Win95 machine its performance has been
deplorable; I'm beginning to think there's something wrong akin to the
notorious Win98SE memory problems which other people have mentioned.
Given that there seem to be literally hundreds of utilities for
enumerating processes,
> Hello,
> 10 Jan 2002, 4:24:05 PM, Marek Mikus wrote:
MM>> one user has set Dispatcher for account which displays new messages
MM>> in mailbox on server. If he receives big message, he want to _not
MM>> receive_ and _not delete_ and not see it in next session - so he
MM>> checked _read_ fla
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Markus Gloede wrote:
>> A message with an attachment exists twice in two separate folders (this
>> not the problem but intentional), when one of it gets deleted (or moved?),
>> the attachment gets lost.
>>
>> The account is set to store attachments in a separate folder and
Bonjour Eddie,
Mardi, le 15 janvier 2002 à 09h42 [GMT +0100] (ce qui correspond à
09h42 ici où j'habite), Eddie Castelli =[EC] a écrit à Thomas F :
ftp://ftp.gin.cz/pub/mswindows/the_bat/glyphs
EC>>> Would you please have a http:// address?
>> If you don't have (or think you don't have) an
Hello Dierk,
On 15 Jan 2002 at 8:54:41 am you wrote (at least in part):
DH> So, the workaround would be to revert to Win9x - as you have to reboot
DH> at least once every 14 hours ...
THAT is in fact a solution :-) Maybe not for his problem, maybe not at
this time in this world, but nevertheles
On 15 January 2002 at 8:17 am Thomas wrote:
> I agree to every word of this paragraph, including the last two. If
> you ask me, they should fix the known bugs (it's a very long list by
> now), release 1.54, then overhaul the interface, release it as next
> version or as 1.54a, and then start pla
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Markus Gloede wrote:
> A message with an attachment exists twice in two separate folders (this
> not the problem but intentional), when one of it gets deleted (or moved?),
> the attachment gets lost.
>
> The account is set to store attachments in a separate folder and to dele
23 matches
Mail list logo
