Wednesday, December 04, 2002
6:23:06 AM
RE: TB! b17 takes 90% of CPU resources
Greetings Tony,
On Wednesday, December 4, 2002, 3:24:52 AM, you wrote:
TB If I turn email scanning off to save time when sending mail, that would
TB also stop incoming mail being scanned.
Certainly there must be
hi
Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 5:21:07 PM:
Umm, well I am using a TB! beta + Imad's ckt build9 beta + a WinRar beta +
Win2K SP3, which is a permanent beta of course, and everything works nicely
thankyou very much :-/
- From following Eddie's thread in PPG Basics it seems that he has a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Micha³,
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 12:43:00 +0100 your time, you said:
MT So he's using a beta MUA with a beta plug-in, uncompressed by a beta
MT decompressor, and the only thing that doesn't work is the retail, full
MT version, tested and
Simon recently typed,
S Weren't you concerned at all about the amount of personal information you
S had to divulge to get the certificate for free?
Not patricularly. The reasons for divulging it was to ensure the
accuracy of it for the recipients. Also I intend to make it
Never seen this one before.
Invalid HTML !
Please forward this message to developers.
Thanks.
EAccessViolation Access violation at address 0040501B in module 'thebat.exe'.
Read of address 01A8
--
Best regards,
Timbo
Timothy Casten mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZDC Area 5 Rep.703.606.2379
On Wednesday, December 4, 2002, 8:41 AM, you wrote:
S Weren't you concerned at all about the amount of personal information you
S had to divulge to get the certificate for free?
TB Not patricularly. The reasons for divulging it was to ensure the
TB accuracy of it for the recipients. Also
Hi!
and how long exactly does it take for that certificate to arrive?
Been waiting half the day now... or isn't it an automated process?
Well, I did wait for 3 days now and did not get anything back. I will try
it again now, maybe I get something back this time.
Regards,
Martin
--
The
You know I have been on this list since way back in the beginnings.
Being a devoted Bat user for along time.
It perturbs me that this list used to be a great source for help and
issues with the Bat, but for the last 6 months or so, it seems to me
that only the folks in The Clique can get a
Hi Timothy,
on Wed, 4 Dec 2002 11:23:41 -0500GMT (04.12.02, 17:23 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TC I have asked for help on many different occasions over the past few
TC months only to receive 0 responses.
What about, no one knows the answer? I have put
Hello Timothy,
Wednesday, December 4, 2002, 4:01:04 PM, you wrote:
TC Never seen this one before.
TC Invalid HTML !
TC Please forward this message to developers.
TC Thanks.
TC EAccessViolation Access violation at address 0040501B in module 'thebat.exe'.
TC Read of address 01A8
What is
Hello Timothy,
A reminder of what Timothy Casten ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
04 December 2002 at 11:23:41 GMT -0500
TC I have asked for help on many different occasions over the past few
TC months only to receive 0 responses.
There is no way I'm part of any Clique. I've been here since
Reply to message sent 12/4/2002, @ 11:23:41 (10:23 AM Locally)
~~~
Hello Timothy,
I have asked for help on many different occasions over the past few
months only to receive 0 responses.
In otherwords the support on this list SUCKS!
I have been getting quite a few of these access violations.
They just started popping up.
Anyone know what they mean.
--
Best regards,
Timbo
Timothy Casten mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZDC Area 5 Rep.703.606.2379
NATCA National Communications Chairman
NatcaNet Administrator
Wednesday,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Martin,
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 11:34:43 +0100 your time, you said:
MS Well, I did wait for 3 days now and did not get anything back.
Same here. I got a confirmation at least, and replied but have had nothing
mailed to me after that.
- --
Hello Timothy,
A reminder of what Timothy Casten ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
04 December 2002 at 11:57:41 GMT -0500
TC I have been getting quite a few of these access violations. They just
TC started popping up. Anyone know what they mean.
If I remember correctly, AV's could be memory
Hi Timothy,
On Wednesday, December 4, 2002 at 11:23:41 [GMT -0500], you wrote:
TC It perturbs me that this list used to be a great source for help and
TC issues with the Bat, but for the last 6 months or so, it seems to me
TC that only the folks in The Clique can get a intelligent response
TC to
Hello Thomas!
On Wednesday, December 4, 2002 at 4:01:13 AM you wrote:
Probably because they are in the beta-cycle of development. I trust
you know what that entails.
No.
2. TME the current CKT beta is - although Imad warns to use it -
very stable. Under Win95 as well as under XP.
The
17 matches
Mail list logo