Hello Dierk,
Tuesday, October 19, 2004, 7:00:58 PM, you wrote:
On Tuesday, October 19, 2004 at 10:00:40 AM you wrote:
And then contact F-Secure support.
Done. I am currently investigating this further. BTW, waking Windows
from hibernation (the Shift+leftmost button) abd starting the
Hello Jurgen!
On Sunday, October 24, 2004 at 8:35:28 AM you wrote:
This thread is already a little bit old, but today I got the same
thing, upon starting TB! I got the message from Panda that TB! has
been changed and if I want to allow connection to internet. Haven't
had that in the few days
Hæ!
Today, I stumbled on a filter which normally only was set up as an
incoming filter, but which also appeared in the Kill filter section as
an Ignore filter. Deleting this one gave me AVs and I had to manually
kill TB via Task Manager.
After restarting TB, both filters were not present
Hi,
since I've installed the latest beta, the filter based color coding does not work in
3.0.2.1 any more. When I execute filtering manually from the sorting office then it
works fine and I see the correct color groups assigned.
Can somebody confirm this ?
--
Michael
The Bat! 3.0.2.1
Dear Stuart,
-- Mittwoch, 20. Oktober 2004, 12:24:13:
MM for me, TB displays error -ERR Server returned code 404 when is
MM IE setting selected.
Bizzare isn't it? Our setup here requires no separate authorization
to access either the proxy or the firewall; logging in to the
network is
Hello Dierk,
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 at 21:17:54 [GMT +0200] (which was 21:17 where I live) you wrote:
DH Hello Zygmunt!
DH On Saturday, October 23, 2004 at 8:49:22 PM you wrote:
%IF:%ABToMemo=PGP:%NoUseSMIMEUsePGP%SignComplete
DH Yes, that is a work-around, would have to add %ENCRYPTCOMPLETE.
Hi Michael,
on Sun, 24 Oct 2004 09:42:49 +0200GMT, you wrote:
M since I've installed the latest beta, the filter based color
M coding does not work in 3.0.2.1 any more. When I execute filtering
M manually from the sorting office then it works fine and I see the
M correct color groups assigned.
Hello Michael,
since I've installed the latest beta, the filter based color coding
does not work in 3.0.2.1 any more. When
I execute filtering manually from the sorting office then it works
fine and I see the correct color groups
assigned.
I confirm this.
I can't even assign a color group
Hi Jonas,
on Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:32:50 +0200GMT, you wrote:
since I've installed the latest beta, the filter based color coding
does not work in 3.0.2.1 any more. When
I execute filtering manually from the sorting office then it works
fine and I see the correct color groups
assigned.
J I
Hello Dierk,
Sunday, October 24, 2004, 3:01:47 AM, you wrote (at least in part):
upon starting TB! I got the message from Panda that TB! has
been changed
I use DiamondCS Process Guard 3 public beta 2 which detects changes in
.exe files but has not detected them with the bat. I also use Jetico
On Sunday, October 24, 2004 at 8:32:50 AM [GMT -0500], Jonas wrote:
I confirm this. I can't even assign a color group manually via right
click context menu.
This smells of being an issue of setup of the actual colour groups.
For each colour group, you have to configure the colour for when
Hi TB Beta list members,
I am unable to use 3.0.2.1 any longer. Filters that are supposed to
create new messages don't. That's a show stopper for me, having many
complex management filters in place that require this functionality.
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3975
I am also suffering
Hello Marck!
On Sunday, October 24, 2004, 9:19 AM, you wrote:
MDP I am unable to use 3.0.2.1 any longer. Filters that are supposed
MDP to create new messages don't. That's a show stopper for me,
MDP having many complex management filters in place that require this
MDP functionality.
MDP
Hi Allie Martin,
AM This smells of being an issue of setup of the actual colour groups.
AM For each colour group, you have to configure the colour for when the
AM message is read and when it's unread. Quite often, users change the
AM colour only for unread status. They try to apply the colour
Hi Jonas,
J Hello Michael,
since I've installed the latest beta, the filter based color coding
does not work in 3.0.2.1 any more. When
I execute filtering manually from the sorting office then it works
fine and I see the correct color groups
assigned.
J I confirm this.
J I can't even
Hi Marck,
on Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:19:32 +0100GMT, you wrote:
MDP I am unable to use 3.0.2.1 any longer. Filters that are supposed to
MDP create new messages don't. That's a show stopper for me, having many
MDP complex management filters in place that require this functionality.
I haven't exactly
Hello Marck!
On Sunday, October 24, 2004, 9:19 AM, you wrote:
MDP I am unable to use 3.0.2.1 any longer. Filters that are supposed to
MDP create new messages don't. ...
Confirmed.
MDP https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3975
I have added a confirming note to the above BT report.
--
Best
On Sunday, October 24, 2004 at 9:26:00 AM [GMT -0500], Michael wrote:
I checked the assigned color groups with a right click on the
message header in the message pane. But it's definitely no color
group assigned. Therefore, it seems to be a filter issue. When I
roolback to 3.01, the same
Hello Peter!
On Sunday, October 24, 2004, 9:41 AM, you wrote:
MDP I am also suffering the can't close TB bug.
PM I had a few of those too. Also some AVs... hmm
Then please confirm, would you, at:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3944
It's my understanding from what Stefan said, that
Hello Jonas everyone else
24-Okt-2004 15:32, you wrote:
I can't even assign a color group manually via right click context menu.
Works fine here.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
using v3.0.2.1 on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2
Progress isn't always for
Hello,
M since I've installed the latest beta, the filter based color
M coding does not work in 3.0.2.1 any more. When I execute filtering
M manually from the sorting office then it works fine and I see the
M correct color groups assigned.
M Can somebody confirm this ?
PM I cannot confirm. My
Hello Dierk,
Saturday, October 23, 2004, 6:23:54 PM, you wrote (possibly edited):
Most people may only need these options and the Privacy menu, but I
can still imagine some more flexibility with the macros for much more
experienced users.
I support the suggestion too, exactly for the above
Hello Mary!
On Saturday, October 23, 2004 at 4:52:57 PM you wrote:
If you'll write a wish in BT, I'll put a supporting note.
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3976
I hope the wish is explained lucidly enough ...
--
Dierk Haasis
:Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept
The Bat 3.0.2.1 on Windows XP
Hello TBBETA Members!
Today I transferred all my filters from my accounts to Common
Filters to save me double filters in different accounts.
Unfortunately it doesn't work, TB's Sorting Office forgets my check
marks under Share with ... upon closing.
Not good - show stopper - should be
Hello Dierk!
On Sunday, October 24, 2004 at 6:10:01 PM you wrote:
Not good - show stopper - should be addresses ASAP!
And on we go:
One filter mysteriously lends its properties (name and contents) to
another one. First I thought I inadvertently deleted a filter but upon
recreation and
Hello Dierk!
On Sunday, October 24, 2004 at 6:23:43 PM you wrote:
Still, it would also be a good idea to have an easier way to check the
accounts, at least for nested filters (like inheriting them from the
parent, or the possibility to highlight all filters at once and then
set common
Hello Dierk!
On Sunday, October 24, 2004, 10:51 AM, you wrote:
MB If you'll write a wish in BT, I'll put a supporting note.
DH https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3976
DH I hope the wish is explained lucidly enough ...
Just added my note of support here. I found the explanation in your
Hello Costas!
On Sunday, October 24, 2004, 10:17 AM, you wrote:
Most people may only need these options and the Privacy menu, but I
can still imagine some more flexibility with the macros for much more
experienced users.
CP I support the suggestion too, exactly for the above reason: Give
CP
On Sunday, October 24, 2004, 15:32, Jonas wrote:
I can't even assign a color group manually via right click context
menu.
What if you switch to another folder and then back? This does sound
like the known update bug 3.0.2.1 suffers from.
--
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33
Hello Allie,
Saturday, October 23, 2004, 4:36:00 PM, you wrote:
AM Not to worry. You'll not be admonished for bringing this up more than
AM once.
this is good :)
AM However, the technically oriented members here tend to be sensitive
AM about TB! being accused of buggy behaviour when it simply
Dear all,
When I'm Online I very much like to have the Option set to 'periodical
check' my Server after a few minutes automatically. When I go off line
and work on other places without Internet TB! is continuing checking
eMail. THis is not only filling the Log with unnecessary entries but
also
Hello all,
Sunday, October 24, 2004, Eddie Castelli wrote:
When I'm Online I very much like to have the Option set to 'periodical
check' my Server after a few minutes automatically. When I go off line
and work on other places without Internet TB! is continuing checking
eMail. THis is not only
Hello Dierk Haasis everyone else
24-Okt-2004 18:10, you wrote:
Today I transferred all my filters from my accounts to Common
Filters to save me double filters in different accounts.
Unfortunately it doesn't work, TB's Sorting Office forgets my check
marks under Share with ... upon
Hello hggdh,
Saturday, October 23, 2004, 6:16:44 PM, you wrote:
h An user should *always* be allowed to View a certificate, mostly
h when there is an issue regarding it's validity (like an incomplete
h root chain). If this does not happen nowadays, then it is a bug on TB!.
h No questions about
Hello Allie,
For each colour group, you have to configure the colour for when the
message is read and when it's unread. Quite often, users change the
colour only for unread status. They try to apply the colour group to a
read message. It's applied. However, there's no change since, for the
I
Hello Allie,
Sorry for the confusion, but I was not not referring to filtering. I was
referring to Jonas' comment that he cannot apply a colour group throught
the right click context menu. I can't confirm that.
I re-checked this, sometimes assigning of color groups work, most times
it
Hello tbbeta,
I cannot get the beta to sign messages using GPG
Sean
--
Sean Rima [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 679813 YAHOO: thecivvie
O2 +353863868343 Vodafone +353872628431
Transvestite: A guy who likes to eat, drink and be Mary!
Using TheBat! 3.0.2.1 and BayesIt! 0.7.4
Windows XP (NT 5.1Build
Dear Sean,
@24-Oct-2004, 22:29 Sean Rima [SR] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
SR I cannot get the beta to sign messages using GPG
Although I stopped using the beta, I didn't have any such problems
myself.
You appear to be double-addressing your postings - a folder template?
--
Cheers --
Hallo tbbeta,
Recently I started testing an IMAP account next to my pop3 account
to the same server. On checking my mail the CC stays active, what
isn't surprising, after all the point of IMAP is to stay in contact
with the server.
As long as I check mail automatically everything is
Hello Redleg,
Sunday, October 24, 2004, 8:09:21 PM, you wrote:
AR Hello Allie,
Discussion-
Whenever the POP/IMAP/SMTP server fails to provide the root/CA
certificate or full chain with the server certificate TB! pops up an
Unknown CA certificate warning.
AM Shouldn't it?
AR Yes it should.
Sean,
Sunday, October 24, 2004, 10:29:51 PM, you wrote:
Hello tbbeta,
I cannot get the beta to sign messages using GPG
Sean
Just sorted it, now to get it to use a front end as the key manager :)
Sean
--
Sean Rima [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 679813 YAHOO: thecivvie
O2 +353863868343
On Sunday, October 24, 2004 at 2:09:21 PM [GMT -0500], Army Redleg
wrote:
Hello Allie,
Saturday, October 23, 2004, 4:36:00 PM, you wrote:
AM Not to worry. You'll not be admonished for bringing this up more than
AM once.
this is good :)
AM However, the technically oriented members here tend
On Sunday, October 24, 2004 at 2:09:21 PM [GMT -0500], Army Redleg
wrote:
AM However, the technically oriented members here tend to be sensitive
AM about TB! being accused of buggy behaviour when it simply fails to
AM cater to non-standard behaviour by servers.
Understood, *if* these servers
Hello Army RL,
Sunday, October 24, 2004, 14:58:59, you wrote:
(snip)
h But, here, we must draw the line. If the user succeeds in finding out
h the missing intermediate roots, and adds them to the base, then
h everything is OK, and life goes on. Otherwise -- i.e. there are still
h missing
Hello hggdh,
Monday, October 25, 2004, 12:46:31 AM, you wrote:
h Secondly, the security/privacy attained by the use of encryption is
h also dependent on guaranteeing the integrity of the certificate (and,
h by extension, of the public/private key pair it uses).
Agreed, however integrity also
45 matches
Mail list logo
