--On 2/07/2005 22:55 +0300 Avi wrote:
Clive, it seems that your position is a bit extreme for me.
Well, perhaps I put my case a little too starkly!
I don't actually object to the occasional use of smilies at the end of a
paragraph or message to indicate mood but I do find it quite offensive
Hello MAU,
Saturday, July 2, 2005, 10:28:25 PM, you wrote:
>> Ok there did this come from. I have now got a [Draft] folder but only on
>> one of my accounts.
> If it is named [Draft], with the brackets, it is a Virtual Folder and I
> wouldn't think it was spontaneously created by TB.
I think th
On Saturday, July 02, 2005 at 2:10:09 PM [GMT -0500], Kevin Amazon
wrote:
>> - I no longer use the ticker. I may revisit this since I haven't tried
>> it in a long time.
> I use it. It works fine
Really? I just tried it and have to assume that you use it only as an
indicator that new messages ha
On Saturday, July 02, 2005 at 8:38:33 PM [GMT -0500], Dwight A Corrin
wrote:
> do you ever get to negative numbers, such as -7?
No. I've managed to get to a -3. :)
I see this when I'm browsing and marking messages read when the message
count is reasserting itself. Usually, the counter goes to 1
On Saturday, July 02, 2005 at 8:37:19 PM [GMT -0500], Dwight A Corrin
wrote:
> Why this has to do with the filtering topic is that I have tried using
> TB! filters and they only filter at the inbox, and only when one opens
> the inbox. Therefore, if one creates filters to move mail at home,
> that
Hi Avi
> if you are some kind of switch-hitter
Merely a humble button-pusher.
> "don't ask, don't tell".
If you don't want to tell, I certainly wouldn't dream of imposing on your
privacy by asking. ;)
>> A fish by any other name would smell as neat.
> Now that's really perverted. :-)
A trout
Hello Allie,
Saturday, July 2, 2005, 11:56:55 AM, you wrote:
> - I start TB! and there are for example 5 messages in the Inbox.
> - I select the Inbox and start reading/deleting mail.
> - The Inbox counts do not reflect the changes even though the deleted
> messages disappear from the list and
Hello Manuel,
Saturday, July 2, 2005, 10:52:29 AM, you wrote:
>> - I don't filter much with TB!
> I filter nothing with TB!, because that's one of the things that brought me
> many duplicates...
IMAP us good because when I read mail at home and some at the office,
and some on the road. It's nic
Hello MAU,
>> Sorting Office, Selective Download filters, Options pane:
>> Use this filter for manual re-filtering only...
>> Isnt it a bug? I mean how can someone invoke a Selective download
>> filter? And why would he do that?
> Bug or overlooked not needed tick box. It is not needed because whe
On Saturday, July 02, 2005 at 4:40:07 PM [GMT -0500], Miguel Urech
wrote:
> Just rename it for a quick test.
After some reshuffling around, I managed to make it stick where I want
it.
--
-= Allie Martin =-
The Bat! v3.5.36
System Specs: http://specs.aimlink.name
-=-=-
In mathematics
On Saturday, July 02, 2005 at 4:40:07 PM [GMT -0500], Miguel Urech
wrote:
>> It probably does. But I don't wish to go through another cycle of
>> having to delete the file and reconfigure all my shortcuts etc.
> Just rename it for a quick test.
You're right. It's tbuser.def
It's proving to be q
Hello Zygmunt!
On Saturday, July 02, 2005, 5:48 PM, you wrote:
< snipped interesting and helpful answers and explanations >
> [1] http://cgi.silverstones.com/library.php#rethread+messages
> Attachments:
> 1. Add_Remove_Reference.txt
Thank you so very much. This will help me. I have a number o
On Saturday, July 2, 2005, at 15:59:15 [UTC-0500] (Saturday, July 2, 2005
22:59 my local time) Mary Bull wrote:
>> You can make many things using such trick, e.g., repair threads, use HTML
>> templates, modify different parts of message or even substitute or delete
>> attachments.
> I am very int
Hello Allie,
> It probably does. But I don't wish to go through another cycle of having
> to delete the file and reconfigure all my shortcuts etc.
Just rename it for a quick test.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5.36 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4
Hello Melanie,
> Okay, done!
> http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4871
Confirmed and added note to BT.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5.36 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4
Current bet
Hello David,
> Ok there did this come from. I have now got a [Draft] folder but only on
> one of my accounts.
If it is named [Draft], with the brackets, it is a Virtual Folder and I
wouldn't think it was spontaneously created by TB.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using
Hello Vili,
> Sorting Office, Selective Download filters, Options pane:
> Use this filter for manual re-filtering only...
>
> Isnt it a bug? I mean how can someone invoke a Selective download
> filter? And why would he do that?
Bug or overlooked not needed tick box. It is not needed because when
Hello Zygmunt!
On Saturday, July 02, 2005, 3:36 PM, you wrote:
> You can make many things using such trick, e.g., repair threads, use HTML
> templates, modify different parts of message or even substitute or delete
> attachments.
I am very intrigued. Would it be practical to set this up as a Qui
On Saturday, July 2, 2005, at 19:25:26 [UTC+0200] (Saturday, July 2, 2005
19:25 my local time) Roelof Otten wrote:
RO>> According to RFC2822 (and that's the law concerning e-mails) a message
RO>> should contain the sender's address in the From header and when that's
RO>> not the case the Resent-Fr
On 7/2/05, Clive Taylor wrote:
> PLEASE join my club. Acronym in footer.
> ...
> Clive Taylor CASE
> (Campaign Against Smilies in Email)
Clive, it seems that your position is a bit extreme for me. I was
introduced to smilies along with my first email client, Pegasus Mail.
In the well-written and i
Hello All,
Ok there did this come from. I have now got a [Draft] folder but only on
one of my accounts.
This is something that I have been asking for since I stared using tb back
in version 1.3 something.
--
Best regards,
David mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Hi Allie Martin
-
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, at 08:23:10 [GMT -0500] (which was 6:23 AM where I
live) you wrote:
After a long absence, I decided to play with the latest build of TB.
To my surprise, it appears to be significantly more robust that any
previous r
On Saturday, July 02, 2005 at 12:31:30 PM [GMT -0500], Raymund Tump
wrote:
> Well, no wonder it takes so long. It needs to download all messages to
> localhost before exporting.
It has to do the same to copy to a local folder, so it should take about
the same time. However, the export tends to go
Hi Allie!
> When doing the export, you'll have to be patient. There's no feedback on
> the progress of the export operation. So you think it's not happening or
> that it's hung in the process of doing it. However, it's usually
> underway and eventually the save dialog appears.
Well, no wonder it
Hallo Roelof,
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005 18:39:04 +0200GMT (2-7-2005, 18:39 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO> IMO TB should not allow you to drop the Resent-From header, unless it
RO> would be replaced by a Sender header, but that would cause similar
RO> problems for you.
RO> According to RFC2822 (and
On Friday, July 1, 2005, at 09:19:51 [UTC-0500] (Friday, July 1, 2005 16:19
my local time) Gary wrote:
> I just added a new entry in the AB, and receive cascading AVs. In
> addition, both the new and reply templates in the AB would not work at all.
> They also would not work for some other old e
Hi Alexander,
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 20:36:19 +0200 UTC (7/1/2005, 1:36 PM -0500 UTC my time),
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
>> addition, both the new and reply templates in the AB would not work at
>> all. They also would not work for some other old existing address entries
>> that I have.
A> I can't co
On Saturday, July 02, 2005 at 9:30:17 AM [GMT -0500], Raymund Tump
wrote:
> I still trying to move my mails from the server folder to a local one.
I long since gave up on that method.
I export the messages to Unix file and then import them to the local
folder.
When doing the export, you'll have
On Saturday, July 02, 2005 at 10:52:29 AM [GMT -0500], Manuel Breitfeld
wrote:
> What's so curious about your inbox? Why does it differ from other
> folders? And what works better with an empty inbox?
It's a curious problem.
- I start TB! and there are for example 5 messages in the Inbox.
- I s
Hallo Bill,
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005 11:12:31 -0500GMT (2-7-2005, 18:12 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
BM> Nothing, but adding a Resent-from line causes filter
BM> problems. An example may be helpful.
Ah, I see. You're problem is not that TB adds identifying headers, but
that they cause filtering p
Hi,
as Manuel pointed out, I forgot to attach the picture...
So here it is...
--
So long folks,
Raymund
imapfolders.PNG
Description: PNG image
Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDL
On Sat 2-Jul-05 2:38am -0500, Roelof Otten wrote:
> Hallo Bill,
>
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 21:16:46 -0500GMT (2-7-2005, 4:16 +0200, where I
> live), you wrote:
>
BM>> TB! violates this. For example, it adds identifying
BM>> headers to outgoing email that can't be changed without
BM>> an external tool
Hi Allie,
On Saturday, 02 Juli 2005 at 3:23 PM you (Allie Martin) wrote:
> - I avoid working with large mailboxes, i.e., no more than 4000 messages
> per mailbox. This may be even less if I end up having say 5 or more
> folders with a large amount of messages.
That's right. The same applies for
Hi Raymund,
On Saturday, 02 Juli 2005 at 4:30 PM you (Raymund Tump) wrote:
> This seems to work with small bunches at once, but that's a bit
> annoying if you have to copy 23,869 mails.
Yes, no way here. Even with a fast connection at my university (~ 2 MB per
second) it hangs.
This appears on
Hello TBBETA,
I still trying to move my mails from the server folder to a local one.
This seems to work with small bunches at once, but that's a bit
annoying if you have to copy 23,869 mails.
What happened after I selected all mails (and waited that the message
content of some was loaded) and dr
--On 2/07/2005 08:23 -0500 Allie wrote:
However, with all that, I still somewhat prefer what it's doing now to
Mulberry
I admire your tenacity, Allie. How much of a bat masochist can you become
before you start screaming?
As far as I'm concerened TB! has become like a Ming vase - something t
Hi all,
I've been using TB! IMAP quite comfortably. However, I'm now having an
Inbox problem that doesn't seem to affect other mailboxes. I'm therefore
considering a workaround. It's then that it struck me that I use a lot
of workarounds with TB!. I'll list them here so that others and the
develop
On Saturday, July 02, 2005 at 5:13:58 AM [GMT -0500], Miguel Urech
wrote:
> Yes, weird. I still think it has something to do with tbuser.def.
It probably does. But I don't wish to go through another cycle of having
to delete the file and reconfigure all my shortcuts etc.
--
-= Allie Martin =-
On Saturday, July 02, 2005 at 5:06:02 AM [GMT -0500], Miguel Urech
wrote:
> Yes, I always forget that IMAP exists and that things are (may be)
> different there.
I don't mind singing that odd note here and there for you. :)
--
-= Allie Martin =-
The Bat! v3.5.36
System Specs: http://specs.aim
Hallo Terry,
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005 12:52:56 +0100GMT (2-7-2005, 13:52 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
>> I tested it over here and the message got in my 'sent mail' just fine
T> This is an IMAP account. Is yours IMAP or POP3?
As it says in my sig: pop3 ;-)
Does it matter whether you use in the fi
Hi Roelof,
On 02 July 2005 at 09:29, Roelof wrote:
> No common outgoing filters?
None at all, either in common or any other account.
> Are you using the %Account= macro?
I've tested it with and without the %ACCOUNT macro. It doesn't make a
difference.
> I tested it over here and the message
Hello Miroslav,
am Samstag, 2. Juli 2005 um 12:23 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> since version 3.5(.0).31 the "Add address" submenu is gone or not working.
>> (in the window named "Pick e-mail addresses")
MF> confirmed.
MF> Do you open a BT? I will confirm it.
Okay, done!
http://www.ritlabs.com/b
On 7/2/05, Melanie wrote:
> since version 3.5(.0).31 the "Add address" submenu is gone or not working.
> (in the window named "Pick e-mail addresses")
>
> If you open the message editor to write a new mail and click on the AB-Icon
> to select an address, there was an option to select the additiona
Hello Peter,
> Works just fine here, see attachment.
you used the wrong PNG file. For 16x16, you need only the file
'minimal-small.png' instead of 'minimal.png' and naturally the
appropriate XML file - see [1].
Is the guidance (readme.txt) unclearly written?
--
best regards
Miroslav
BAT-MAI
Hi Melanie,
> since version 3.5(.0).31 the "Add address" submenu is gone or not working.
> (in the window named "Pick e-mail addresses")
confirmed.
Do you open a BT? I will confirm it.
Something is wrong with your sig delimiter.
--
best regards
Miroslav
BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu
Hello Allie,
> Go figure.
Yes, weird. I still think it has something to do with tbuser.def.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5.0.31 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4
Current beta is 3.5.36
Hello Allie,
> This will not work for an IMAP user since imported messages are imported
> to the local cache and not to the actual mailbox.
Yes, I always forget that IMAP exists and that things are (may be)
different there.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat!
Hello tbbeta,
since version 3.5(.0).31 the "Add address" submenu is gone or not working.
(in the window named "Pick e-mail addresses")
If you open the message editor to write a new mail and click on the AB-Icon
to select an address, there was an option to select the additional
mailaddresses for a
Hallo Terry,
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005 09:09:49 +0100GMT (2-7-2005, 10:09 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
>> My first guess would be that you've an outgoing filter that moves
>> the message somewhere else.
T> Brand new account with no other filters. :( Guess I'll open a bug
T> report. Thanks for th
Roelof penned:
> My first guess would be that you've an outgoing filter that moves
> the message somewhere else.
Brand new account with no other filters. :( Guess I'll open a bug
report. Thanks for the reply.
--
Regards,
Terry
Using The Bat! v3.5.36 Pro on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service
Hallo Bill,
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 21:16:46 -0500GMT (2-7-2005, 4:16 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
BM> TB! violates this. For example, it adds identifying
BM> headers to outgoing email that can't be changed without
BM> an external tool.
What do you consider identifying about Date, Message-ID or
51 matches
Mail list logo
