Re: 36: Failure of Ctrl-Right (reading unread messages)

2005-07-03 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Bill, On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 01:29:54 -0500GMT (4-7-2005, 8:29 +0200, where I live), you wrote: BM> I use Ctrl-Right to read mail. It skips to the next BM> unread message in the current folder (or the next BM> folder when all messages are marked read in the current BM> folder). BM> It is no l

36: Failure of Ctrl-Right (reading unread messages)

2005-07-03 Thread Bill McCarthy
Hello TB Beta List, I use Ctrl-Right to read mail. It skips to the next unread message in the current folder (or the next folder when all messages are marked read in the current folder). It is no longer going to the first unread message. Here is an example. Suppose a folder (in threaded view) h

Re: 3.5.36

2005-07-03 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Sun 3-Jul-05 3:01pm -0500, Mary Bull wrote: > On Sunday, July 03, 2005, 2:50 PM, you wrote: > >> IMHO, an .msi could be done using this >> version to replace beta 30 >> (that, is the current official release, FAIK). > > I would have no objections. It is working as well (in POP3) --or > bet

Re[4]: 3.5.36

2005-07-03 Thread Goncalo Farias
Hi Clive, In reply to : CT> --On 3/07/2005 20:50 +0100 Goncalo wrote: >> I didn't saw any major complaint though IMAP and EXCHANGE support are >> still broken. CT> Isn't that enough to complain about? I don't think so because b30, which is the official release, has thos

Re: another reason for the ability to edit incoming mail

2005-07-03 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Sat 2-Jul-05 12:25pm -0500, Roelof Otten wrote: > When you really want to drop the Resent-from, then you could use this > filter: Thanks for showing this method to the group. I use similar filters for a multitude of purposes. For this particular purpose, I take a different approach: (1)

Re: Re[2]: 3.5.36

2005-07-03 Thread Clive Taylor
--On 3/07/2005 20:50 +0100 Goncalo wrote: I didn't saw any major complaint though IMAP and EXCHANGE support are still broken. Isn't that enough to complain about? -- Clive Taylor Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information: htt

Re: Editor Toolbar will not go back where I put it

2005-07-03 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Sat 2-Jul-05 5:52am -0500, Miroslav Florensen wrote: >> Works just fine here, see attachment. > > you used the wrong PNG file. For 16x16, you need only the file > 'minimal-small.png' instead of 'minimal.png' and naturally the > appropriate XML file - see [1]. > > Is the guidance (readme.txt) un

Re: another reason for the ability to edit incoming mail

2005-07-03 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Sat 2-Jul-05 11:39am -0500, Roelof Otten wrote: > According to RFC2822 (and that's the law concerning > e-mails) a message should contain the sender's > address in the From header and when that's not the > case the Resent-From or the Sender header should be > present. When this causes filtering

Mod: Top posting (was: AV in Network and Administration)

2005-07-03 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo cmwilliams, On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 21:06 +0100GMT (3-7-2005, 22:06 +0200, where I live), you wrote: C> change settings from LAN to dialup, not ideal for automatic periodic checking! C> On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 16:35:00 +0200 you wrote: C> Hi Mary, C> on Sun, 3 Jul 2005 09:14:45 -0500GMT (03.07.2

Re: Editor Toolbar will not go back where I put it

2005-07-03 Thread MAU
Hello Allie, > ... while a new one is updated just fine. Now why isn't the old one > being updated properly. That's the big question for the programmers. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.5.36 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4 _

Re: AV in Network and Administration

2005-07-03 Thread cmwilliams
Hello Peter, Confirmed here, Windows 2000 and has been happening since at least v3.5.31. Could this be a problem that only occurs on Windows 2000? I use version 2.12 on my desktop (Windows XP), no problems with that, and I was able to export these registry settings for the dial-up and import this

Re: 3.5.36

2005-07-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Goncalo! On Sunday, July 03, 2005, 2:50 PM, you wrote: > IMHO, an .msi could be done using this version to replace beta 30 > (that, is the current official release, FAIK). I would have no objections. It is working as well (in POP3) --or better--for me as any version I've used, since m

Re[2]: 3.5.36

2005-07-03 Thread Goncalo Farias
Hi, In reply to : CT> --On 3/07/2005 19:46 +0100 Tony wrote: >> Went for a bath, made a cup of tea, etc etc CT> Me too, except I grew a beard as well. I wonder if everybody considers this new beta as a major improvement over the previous beta and the current official

Re: IMAP "No Message Loaded" [was Re: 3.5.36]

2005-07-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Clive! On Sunday, July 03, 2005, 2:45 PM, you wrote: >> Please see Allie's fine comments on dealing with this > Unfortunately, that doesn't help although we're using the same version and > same IMAP server (as Tony is). So, wait for a response from 9Val, when he may (one can hope) come ba

Re: IMAP "No Message Loaded" [was Re: 3.5.36]

2005-07-03 Thread Clive Taylor
--On 3/07/2005 14:39 -0500 Mary wrote: Please see Allie's fine comments on dealing with this Unfortunately, that doesn't help although we're using the same version and same IMAP server (as Tony is). -- Clive Taylor Current beta is 3.5

IMAP "No Message Loaded" [was Re: 3.5.36]

2005-07-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Tony and Clive, and others interested in IMAP! On Sunday, July 03, 2005, 1:46 PM, Tony wrote: > Tried 36 and very first message... "No Message Loaded". Went for a bath, > made a cup of tea, cooked spaghetti bolognese, cut the grass, washed and > polished the car, repointed the chimney stack

Re: 3.5.36

2005-07-03 Thread Clive Taylor
--On 3/07/2005 19:46 +0100 Tony wrote: Went for a bath, made a cup of tea, etc etc Me too, except I grew a beard as well. -- Clive Taylor Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

2005-07-03 Thread Tony Boom
--On 3 July 2005 16:47:07 +0100 Tony Boom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: His mail always threads fine here. I lied, they used to but I found a few that don't. -- Tony. i. Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://ww

Re: 3.5.36

2005-07-03 Thread Tony Boom
--On 1 July 2005 14:16:27 +0300 Maxim Masiutin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [-] IMAP connections could hang Still do! Tried 36 and very first message... "No Message Loaded". Went for a bath, made a cup of tea, cooked spaghetti bolognese, cut the grass, washed and polished the car, repointed

Re: IMAP: Move mails to folder

2005-07-03 Thread Raymund Tump
Hi Allie! > > I found another way, which was relatively fast: First I sync'ed the > > folder with full messages and then I simply selected all and moved > > them to my local folder. That's it. (Took around 30 min.) > I'll keep that tip in mind. Thanks. Maybe I laughed too early. The messages are

Re: IMAP: Move mails to folder

2005-07-03 Thread Allie Martin
On Sunday, July 03, 2005 at 7:12:03 AM [GMT -0500], Raymund Tump wrote: > I found another way, which was relatively fast: First I sync'ed the > folder with full messages and then I simply selected all and moved > them to my local folder. That's it. (Took around 30 min.) I'll keep that tip in mind

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

2005-07-03 Thread Allie Martin
On Sunday, July 03, 2005 at 8:41:34 AM [GMT -0500], Dwight A Corrin wrote: > Maybe there is some way I'm missing to do a few other server side > message management functions? Nope. A lot of what you can do to messages in TB! are just POP stuff which may be done only to the local cache copies of m

Re: Vili's Mails not threaded

2005-07-03 Thread Tony Boom
--On 30 June 2005 19:40:47 +0200 Martin Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't want to point my finger at Vili ;-) but do you others also get his mails not threading? His mail always threads fine here. -- Tony. i. Current be

Re: AV in Network and Administration

2005-07-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Peter! On Sunday, July 03, 2005, 9:35 AM, you wrote: > This doesn't represent an acute problem, because I can establish the > connection first, and after that use The Bat! as usual. Still, I'd > like to be able to change the settings, particularly for the notebook. Perhaps more technically

Re: Base damaged

2005-07-03 Thread Vili
Hello Alto, There was a similar case on TBUDL once, I wrote this to him/her: "This is what you have to do: - _copy_ (dont move) the PART0001.BIN to somewhere, just to have a backup - make a new folder in TB! - rename PART0001.BIN to PART0001.TBB - import the mails from PART0001.TBB using Tools,

Re: AV in Network and Administration

2005-07-03 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Mary, on Sun, 3 Jul 2005 09:14:45 -0500GMT (03.07.2005, 16:14 +0200GMT here), you wrote: PM>>> in Options -- Network and Administration I cannot change anything (see PM>>> attachment). Clicking ok on the AV window leaves the cursor as the PM>>> hourglass, but I can click Cancel anyway, and TB

Re: AV in Network and Administration

2005-07-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Peter! On Sunday, July 03, 2005, 9:01 AM, you wrote: PM>> in Options -- Network and Administration I cannot change anything (see PM>> attachment). Clicking ok on the AV window leaves the cursor as the PM>> hourglass, but I can click Cancel anyway, and TB! moves on fine. > It happens on my

Re: Base damaged

2005-07-03 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Alto, On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 15:02:14 +0200GMT (3-7-2005, 15:02 +0200, where I live), you wrote: AS> 1.) The used version of TheBat is v3.0.1.33. Are such occurences AS> (mailbase disruption without aparent reason, repair of folder by AS> deleting messages) known in this version, and if so, has

Re: AV in Network and Administration

2005-07-03 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi all, on Mon, 27 Jun 2005 20:45:55 +0200GMT, I wrote: PM> in Options -- Network and Administration I cannot change anything (see PM> attachment). Clicking ok on the AV window leaves the cursor as the PM> hourglass, but I can click Cancel anyway, and TB! moves on fine. It happens on my main mac

Re[2]: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

2005-07-03 Thread Dwight A Corrin
Hello Allie, Saturday, July 2, 2005, 11:22:03 PM, you wrote: >> I must say I'd sure rather make my filters in TB! than the clunky HTML >> interface at fastmail. > FastMail supports Seive scripting. It's a special filtering script. > Instead of using the filter creation interface, you can create

Base damaged

2005-07-03 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi all, on a TheBat installation that I service all the mails in the INBOX vanished at some time during the last days. (Of course, the user "did nothing" at the time. ;-) ) When I looked at the directory there was a large (about 15 MB which could very well be the size of the now gone messages) fi

Re: IMAP: Move mails to folder

2005-07-03 Thread Raymund Tump
Hi Allie! > likely to wait while watching a counter. While waiting without feedback, > each second is like 2 seconds. :) I found another way, which was relatively fast: First I sync'ed the folder with full messages and then I simply selected all and moved them to my local folder. That's it. (Took

Re: Editor Toolbar will not go back where I put it

2005-07-03 Thread Miroslav Florensen
Hello Peter, > After having a closer look at it, it appears you've made more changes to > it than just the "ToolbarIcons" size definition. Yes. A lot of different modifications, specially only for the minimal glyph set. > - use an icons folder beneath > - use a specific folder beneath to hold a

Re: Editor Toolbar will not go back where I put it

2005-07-03 Thread Allie Martin
On Sunday, July 03, 2005 at 4:02:27 AM [GMT -0500], Miguel Urech wrote: >> It's proving to be quite an easily corrupted file. > I wouldn't say it is 'corrupted', just not updated properly. ... while a new one is updated just fine. Now why isn't the old one being updated properly. There's a probl

Re[2]: Autoreply filter - possible bug?

2005-07-03 Thread Terry
Hi Roelof, I need to make a change to my previous answer. I never thought of looking in the Outbox since the mail had been sent. No counters ever changed and there was no indication that any mail was in that folder. I happened to check it and a copy of the sent mail is visible in the local Outbo

Re: Draft Folder

2005-07-03 Thread MAU
Hello David, >>> Ok there did this come from. I have now got a [Draft] folder but only on >>> one of my accounts. > >> If it is named [Draft], with the brackets, it is a Virtual Folder and I >> wouldn't think it was spontaneously created by TB. > > I think that you are right and I think it was me

Re: Selective download, Manual filter only

2005-07-03 Thread MAU
Hello Vili, >> Bug or overlooked not needed tick box. It is not needed because when you >> do a manual re-filter, Selective Download Filters are not available. > > I thought the same. Then I will make my first bug report today :) It > will be easy to fix :) > I'll add a note if you post the link.

Re: Editor Toolbar will not go back where I put it

2005-07-03 Thread MAU
Hello Allie, >> Just rename it for a quick test. > > After some reshuffling around, I managed to make it stick where I want > it. If not, manually editing tbuser.def can do wonders. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.5.36 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack

Re: Editor Toolbar will not go back where I put it

2005-07-03 Thread MAU
Hello Allie, >>> It probably does. But I don't wish to go through another cycle of >>> having to delete the file and reconfigure all my shortcuts etc. > >> Just rename it for a quick test. > > You're right. It's tbuser.def You know about beers, don't you? It's quite hot here today ;-) > It's pro

Re[2]: Autoreply filter - possible bug?

2005-07-03 Thread Terry
Hi Roelof, > As it says in my sig: pop3 ;-) Oops, didn't check the sig but will next time. > Does it matter whether you use in the filter options: > Send message: according to account settings/ immediately/ queue in outbox Haven't tried that one yet. > Are you using a local or a remote outbox

Re: address book AVs

2005-07-03 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Gary & everyone else, on 02-Jul-2005 at 19:13 you (Gary) wrote: A>> Since you're talking of templates, did you mean an address book group A>> maybe? > no, just double click on the new (or any address really), and I go to the > new message and reply tabs to enter and put in new templates fo