On Tuesday, December 6, 2005, 7:37:42 PM, mark davidson wrote:
> interesting ... i tested and retested to be sure of my facts, or at
> least what i was experiencing, before posting to the list. TB here
> is set to 'check before send/queue'.
so did I. If you are set to only spell check after you
Hello Stefan,
Tuesday, December 6, 2005, 1:17:17 PM, you wrote:
SR> Hello List! Hi Narayana,
SR> on 06.12.2005 at 04:57 [UTC +0530] you wrote:
>> "Token activation data is invalid. Please run the Token activation
>> utility".
SR> This is because of the Volume Serial Number changed.
>> I am no
hi dwight,
>> a further quirk of the spell checker implementation in TB is that
>> the terms 'ignore all' and 'cancel' are defined at odds with spell
>> checkers in other e-mail programs i've used.
> I just ran the spell check using both the 'check entire text' option
> and 'check before send/que
Hello Hendrik!
On Tuesday, December 06, 2005, 6:23 PM, you wrote:
Who is able to detect that the message is modified?
>> I could not.
>> The alteration was not detected here, using PGP 6.5.8ckt.
> Thank you for feedback! :)
You're most welcome. :)
> I have opened a bugtracker entry:
> htt
"Mary Bull" wrote on 06/12/2005 at 02:14:48 +1100
subject "Green PGP butten even with altered message" :
>>> Who is able to detect that the message is modified?
> I could not.
> The alteration was not detected here, using PGP 6.5.8ckt.
Thank you for feedback! :)
I have opened a bugtracker en
On Tuesday, December 6, 2005, 4:16:01 PM, mark davidson wrote:
>> I don't know if others feel the same way, but I find the
>> confirmation dialog at the end a spell check (particularly) when
>> sending a message very annoying. It is not as though you can do
>> anything other than pick OK. It can a
On Tuesday, December 6, 2005, at 23:31:36 [UTC+0100] (Tuesday, December 6,
2005 23:31 my local time) Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 6, 2005, at 15:59:13 [UTC-0600] (Tuesday, December 6,
> 2005 22:59 my local time) Nick Danger wrote:
>> Odd. It works fine when called directly,
On Tuesday, December 6, 2005, at 15:59:13 [UTC-0600] (Tuesday, December 6,
2005 22:59 my local time) Nick Danger wrote:
>> %ProgramDir
> Odd. It works fine when called directly, but doesn't seem to work when
> nested and called via a %QINCLUDE macro.
Probably you use single "%" prefix sign in Q
hi ian,
> I don't know if others feel the same way, but I find the confirmation
> dialog at the end a spell check (particularly) when sending a message
> very annoying. It is not as though you can do anything other than pick
> OK. It can also have other side effects.
a further quirk of the spell
Reply to message sent 12/06/2005, @ 22:42:51 (3:42 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Roelof,
> %ProgramDir
Odd. It works fine when called directly, but doesn't seem to work when
nested and called via a %QINCLUDE macro.
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
___
Reply to message sent 12/06/2005, @ 22:42:51 (3:42 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Roelof,
> %ProgramDir
BINGO!
Thanks Roelof.
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
Current beta is 3.63.06 | 'Using T
Reply to message sent 12/06/2005, @ 20:51:38 (1:51 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Peter,
> Maybe we need to be able to enter "virtual"/relative folders, like
> %maildir% or %programdir%.
Yeah, it would also be nice for using filters to run exter
Hallo Nick,
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 13:41:13 -0600GMT (6-12-2005, 20:41 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
ND> Is there any way to refer to a text file for cookies in Voyager
ND> without specifying a drive designation?
%ProgramDir
--
Groetjes, Roelof
"In God we trust. All others we monitor..." A Na
Nick,
On 06-12-2005 20:41, you [ND] wrote in
:
ND> Is there any way to refer to a text file for cookies in Voyager
ND> without specifying a drive designation?
Maybe we need to be able to enter "virtual"/relative folders, like
%maildir% or %programdir%.
--
Best regards
Peter Fjelsten
3.6
Hello Ian...
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 06:55:51 +1100, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I don't know if others feel the same way, but I find the confirmation
>dialog at the end a spell check (particularly) when sending a message
>very annoying. It is not as though you can do anything other than pick
>OK. It can also
Is there any way to refer to a text file for cookies in Voyager
without specifying a drive designation?
Thanks,
--
Fly for now,
òžó Nick
Danger
[MUA: The Bat! v3.63.07 (BETA)]
[OS: Windows XP 5 1]
Current beta is 3.63.06 | 'Using TBB
On Monday, December 5, 2005 @ 10:59:45 AM [-0700], Roelof Otten wrote:
MT>> Not sure if it's been mentioned yet (couldn't tell through all of the
MT>> Voyager related chatter) but now that Voyager seems to be a hot topic,
MT>> shouldn't we create a VoyagerBETA list?
> Don't think that's necessary
Reply to message sent 12/05/2005, @ 20:44:25 (1:44 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Robert,
> Get rid of that and let everything be relative to the General Mail
> Directory, and it works.
Wow, what an adventure that turned out to be!
I changed t
Hi Nick,
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, at 13:55:15 [GMT -0600] (which was 20:55 where I live)
you wrote about: 'Voyager - I'm crying Uncle.'
> Hello Robert,
>> What is your setting for Home Directory in Account Properties/Files &
>> Directories. Did you speficy a complete path or are you using .
>> I have
Hallo Martin,
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 10:27:55 +0100GMT (6-12-2005, 10:27 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
MS> I'm running TB Prof with OTFE, so folder names are encrypted on the hard
MS> disk.
Yuck, try to encrypt their names.
MS> Also Shift-Crtl-Alt-L does not work (but this is for IMAP only,
MS>
Hi all,
again there are missing folders. Lost somewhere between yesterday evening
and about one to two weeks ago. :-(
I'm running TB Prof with OTFE, so folder names are encrypted on the hard
disk.
This time creating new folders with the same name like mentioned in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] does not
Hallo tbbeta,
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3157
When you create a new event in the scheduler with a message that's
supposed to be sent to all linked contacts, TB creates a new
message all right, but addresses it to Max <0>, Stefan <0>,
Alexander <0>, 9Val <0>, etc.
It inserts
22 matches
Mail list logo