Re: Confirmation dialog at the end of spell check when sending

2005-12-06 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Tuesday, December 6, 2005, 7:37:42 PM, mark davidson wrote: > interesting ... i tested and retested to be sure of my facts, or at > least what i was experiencing, before posting to the list. TB here > is set to 'check before send/queue'. so did I. If you are set to only spell check after you

Re[2]: Token activation data is invalid. Please run the Token activation utility. - Please help me

2005-12-06 Thread Narayana
Hello Stefan, Tuesday, December 6, 2005, 1:17:17 PM, you wrote: SR> Hello List! Hi Narayana, SR> on 06.12.2005 at 04:57 [UTC +0530] you wrote: >> "Token activation data is invalid. Please run the Token activation >> utility". SR> This is because of the Volume Serial Number changed. >> I am no

Re: Confirmation dialog at the end of spell check when sending

2005-12-06 Thread mark davidson
hi dwight, >> a further quirk of the spell checker implementation in TB is that >> the terms 'ignore all' and 'cancel' are defined at odds with spell >> checkers in other e-mail programs i've used. > I just ran the spell check using both the 'check entire text' option > and 'check before send/que

Re: Green PGP butten even with altered message

2005-12-06 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Hendrik! On Tuesday, December 06, 2005, 6:23 PM, you wrote: Who is able to detect that the message is modified? >> I could not. >> The alteration was not detected here, using PGP 6.5.8ckt. > Thank you for feedback! :) You're most welcome. :) > I have opened a bugtracker entry: > htt

Re: Green PGP butten even with altered message

2005-12-06 Thread Hendrik Oesterlin
"Mary Bull" wrote on 06/12/2005 at 02:14:48 +1100 subject "Green PGP butten even with altered message" : >>> Who is able to detect that the message is modified? > I could not. > The alteration was not detected here, using PGP 6.5.8ckt. Thank you for feedback! :) I have opened a bugtracker en

Re: Confirmation dialog at the end of spell check when sending

2005-12-06 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Tuesday, December 6, 2005, 4:16:01 PM, mark davidson wrote: >> I don't know if others feel the same way, but I find the >> confirmation dialog at the end a spell check (particularly) when >> sending a message very annoying. It is not as though you can do >> anything other than pick OK. It can a

Re: Voyager & cookies

2005-12-06 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Tuesday, December 6, 2005, at 23:31:36 [UTC+0100] (Tuesday, December 6, 2005 23:31 my local time) Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote: > On Tuesday, December 6, 2005, at 15:59:13 [UTC-0600] (Tuesday, December 6, > 2005 22:59 my local time) Nick Danger wrote: >> Odd. It works fine when called directly,

Re: Voyager & cookies

2005-12-06 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Tuesday, December 6, 2005, at 15:59:13 [UTC-0600] (Tuesday, December 6, 2005 22:59 my local time) Nick Danger wrote: >> %ProgramDir > Odd. It works fine when called directly, but doesn't seem to work when > nested and called via a %QINCLUDE macro. Probably you use single "%" prefix sign in Q

Re: Confirmation dialog at the end of spell check when sending

2005-12-06 Thread mark davidson
hi ian, > I don't know if others feel the same way, but I find the confirmation > dialog at the end a spell check (particularly) when sending a message > very annoying. It is not as though you can do anything other than pick > OK. It can also have other side effects. a further quirk of the spell

Re: Voyager & cookies

2005-12-06 Thread Nick Danger
Reply to message sent 12/06/2005, @ 22:42:51 (3:42 PM Locally) ~~~ Hello Roelof, > %ProgramDir Odd. It works fine when called directly, but doesn't seem to work when nested and called via a %QINCLUDE macro. -- ò.ó Nick Danger ___

Re: Voyager & cookies

2005-12-06 Thread Nick Danger
Reply to message sent 12/06/2005, @ 22:42:51 (3:42 PM Locally) ~~~ Hello Roelof, > %ProgramDir BINGO! Thanks Roelof. -- ò.ó Nick Danger Current beta is 3.63.06 | 'Using T

Re: Voyager & cookies

2005-12-06 Thread Nick Danger
Reply to message sent 12/06/2005, @ 20:51:38 (1:51 PM Locally) ~~~ Hello Peter, > Maybe we need to be able to enter "virtual"/relative folders, like > %maildir% or %programdir%. Yeah, it would also be nice for using filters to run exter

Re: Voyager & cookies

2005-12-06 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Nick, On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 13:41:13 -0600GMT (6-12-2005, 20:41 +0100, where I live), you wrote: ND> Is there any way to refer to a text file for cookies in Voyager ND> without specifying a drive designation? %ProgramDir -- Groetjes, Roelof "In God we trust. All others we monitor..." A Na

Re: Voyager & cookies

2005-12-06 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Nick, On 06-12-2005 20:41, you [ND] wrote in : ND> Is there any way to refer to a text file for cookies in Voyager ND> without specifying a drive designation? Maybe we need to be able to enter "virtual"/relative folders, like %maildir% or %programdir%. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.6

Re: Confirmation dialog at the end of spell check when sending

2005-12-06 Thread steverio
Hello Ian... On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 06:55:51 +1100, you wrote: >Hi, > >I don't know if others feel the same way, but I find the confirmation >dialog at the end a spell check (particularly) when sending a message >very annoying. It is not as though you can do anything other than pick >OK. It can also

Voyager & cookies

2005-12-06 Thread Nick Danger
Is there any way to refer to a text file for cookies in Voyager without specifying a drive designation? Thanks, -- Fly for now, òžó Nick Danger [MUA: The Bat! v3.63.07 (BETA)] [OS: Windows XP 5 1] Current beta is 3.63.06 | 'Using TBB

Re: Voyager threads

2005-12-06 Thread Matt Thoene
On Monday, December 5, 2005 @ 10:59:45 AM [-0700], Roelof Otten wrote: MT>> Not sure if it's been mentioned yet (couldn't tell through all of the MT>> Voyager related chatter) but now that Voyager seems to be a hot topic, MT>> shouldn't we create a VoyagerBETA list? > Don't think that's necessary

Re: Voyager - I'm crying Uncle.

2005-12-06 Thread Nick Danger
Reply to message sent 12/05/2005, @ 20:44:25 (1:44 PM Locally) ~~~ Hello Robert, > Get rid of that and let everything be relative to the General Mail > Directory, and it works. Wow, what an adventure that turned out to be! I changed t

Re: Voyager - I'm crying Uncle.

2005-12-06 Thread Robert van der Hulst
Hi Nick, On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, at 13:55:15 [GMT -0600] (which was 20:55 where I live) you wrote about: 'Voyager - I'm crying Uncle.' > Hello Robert, >> What is your setting for Home Directory in Account Properties/Files & >> Directories. Did you speficy a complete path or are you using . >> I have

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2005-12-06 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Martin, On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 10:27:55 +0100GMT (6-12-2005, 10:27 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MS> I'm running TB Prof with OTFE, so folder names are encrypted on the hard MS> disk. Yuck, try to encrypt their names. MS> Also Shift-Crtl-Alt-L does not work (but this is for IMAP only, MS>

Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2005-12-06 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi all, again there are missing folders. Lost somewhere between yesterday evening and about one to two weeks ago. :-( I'm running TB Prof with OTFE, so folder names are encrypted on the hard disk. This time creating new folders with the same name like mentioned in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] does not

Long standing bug in scheduler still not fixed

2005-12-06 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo tbbeta, https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3157 When you create a new event in the scheduler with a message that's supposed to be sent to all linked contacts, TB creates a new message all right, but addresses it to Max <0>, Stefan <0>, Alexander <0>, 9Val <0>, etc. It inserts