On Thursday, December 29, 2005, at 10:14:04 [UTC+0400] (Thursday,
December 29, 2005 07:14 my local time) Den V. Yafyasov wrote:
When sheduler execute this action, the mail was send to the address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is still existing bug, see report
Jernej,
On 21-12-2005 21:01, you [JS] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
JS Definitely not gone, just takes a bit longer:
Precisely!
I can confirm that this one also crashes here:
---
The Bat!: theBat.exe - Application Error
---
The instruction at
12/29/2005 7:25 AM
Hi Peter,
On 12/29/2005 Peter Fjelsten wrote:
PF So Ritlabs, are you going to fix this any time soon?
Seems like a local problem...
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.64.01 Voyager on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP Opera 8.51
Paul,
On 29-12-2005 13:26, you [PVN] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PF So Ritlabs, are you going to fix this any time soon?
PVN Seems like a local problem...
Well, it's a local problem brought about due to changes in the code!
I have had problems with crashes in the last 4 betas but never
On 29/12/2005 at 8:19:14 AM [GMT -0500], Paul Van Noord wrote:
I have not had a crash since an early v. 2. Other problems, yes, but
no crashes. I have never used XP on one of my machines though. If this
beta were unstable there should be much more noise about it.
Yes. No stability problems
Curtis,
On 29-12-2005 14:28, you [C] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
C Makes me wonder what it is that Peter's setup that's so different
C from others to be creating the AV's.
Jernej also gets them. As I wrote to Paul - I have changed nothing
between everything ran OK to when they begun. As you
Hallo Peter,
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:35:47 +0100GMT (29-12-2005, 14:35 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
PF Jernej also gets them. As I wrote to Paul - I have changed nothing
PF between everything ran OK to when they begun. As you can see, I am
PF running .14 - here there is no problem. Nor in
Roelof,
On 29-12-2005 14:51, you [RO] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
RO What happens when you run TBV with a restored backup from your
RO message base?
I'll try that.
(For the record: I do not think TB! should be allowed to crash no matter
whether this is an IMAP issue, a message base issue or
12/29/2005 8:58 AM
Hi Peter,
On 12/29/2005 Peter Fjelsten wrote:
PF All I do is exchange the exe.
Understood, however there is a combination of things on your machine
that may have existed for some time that are only visible when certain
memory calls are made by a given program. It is a nasty
Paul,
On 29-12-2005 15:05, you [PVN] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PVN Also, XP SP1 is not the standard for XP. I understand there is some
PVN overriding concern for you to stay with SP1 but there might also be
PVN a price to pay for doing so.
I am only using SP1 here at work. At home (check
Hello TheBat Beta List Members!!!
I have one filter for common folders that mark message as parked when
I read it (exactly when I go to another message). For SmaprtSpace
feature this filter don't work. When I change messages trough cursors
everything works OK.
TB 3.64.01 - OTFE eToken
--
12/29/2005 8:14 AM
Hi Peter,
On 12/29/2005 Peter Fjelsten wrote:
PF I have had problems with crashes in the last 4 betas but never (AFAIR)
PF before - and I know _I_ haven't changed anything during this time.
I have not had a crash since an early v. 2. Other problems, yes, but
no crashes. I
Hello Peter Fjelsten everyone else,
on 29-Dez-2005 at 15:09 you (Peter Fjelsten) wrote:
PVN Also, XP SP1 is not the standard for XP. I understand there is some
PVN overriding concern for you to stay with SP1 but there might also be a
PVN price to pay for doing so.
I am only using SP1 here at
Hi,
I'm currently trialling the Agava antispam plugin with TBV.
IT seems to be quite efficient but I encounter just a little problem.
As tbv, I thought this plugin could work portably.
But even if I could install it with no problem on my USB key, I
noticed that the relative antispam training
Roelof,
On 29-12-2005 14:51, you [RO] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
RO What happens when you run TBV with a restored backup from your
RO message base?
Is TBV and Pro the same? What would it tell us?
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten /author
thebat version 3.63.06
On 2005-12-21 (19:03), you wrote:
Happy to report that the MSI ran fine here, since we never got to test
it.
This edition used on Exchenage (IMAP) leaves sent messages in outbox
folder - they are not moved into 'sent' folder.
Best regards, Krzysztof Kudłacik
--
pb _, )\__/( ,_
Krzysztof,
On 29-12-2005 21:57, you [KK] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
KK This edition used on Exchenage (IMAP) leaves sent messages in
KK outbox folder - they are not moved into 'sent' folder.
All the last versions have done this for me.
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author
Hi Charlene Ferrara,
Thursday, December 29, 2005
you let us know -possibly edited- :
I sent 12 large messages, all travelled safely to their final
destination as they should. Yet there is no sign of the numbers above 7
in the Sent folder. And the logfile says that the msg could not be
Hello all,
recently I viewed my account logfile.
I sent 12 large messages, all travelled safely to their final
destination as they should. Yet there is no sign of the numbers above 7
in the Sent folder. And the logfile says that the msg could not be
stored in that specific folder.
Any ideas on
Charlene Ferrara wrote on 30/12/2005 at 08:35:29 +1100
subject msgs not stored in Sent folder :
I sent 12 large messages, all travelled safely to their final
destination as they should. Yet there is no sign of the numbers above 7
in the Sent folder. And the logfile says that the msg could not
Hi Hendrik Oesterlin,
Friday, December 30, 2005
you let us know -possibly edited- :
Can not confirm with 12 manually created small messages. all was fine
as it should.
This happened before: During the advent season I used to send -to those
who agreed- a narrated carol, all together 24 mails
Hallo Peter,
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:42:32 +0100GMT (29-12-2005, 21:42 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
RO What happens when you run TBV with a restored backup from your
RO message base?
PF Is TBV and Pro the same? What would it tell us?
TBV and Pro are not quite the same, but they've got a lot
Claude...
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:41:32 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently trialling the Agava antispam plugin with TBV.
IT seems to be quite efficient but I encounter just a little problem.
As tbv, I thought this plugin could work portably.
But even if I could install it with no problem on
Hello Charlene,
recently I viewed my account logfile.
I sent 12 large messages, all travelled safely to their final
destination as they should. Yet there is no sign of the numbers above 7
in the Sent folder. And the logfile says that the msg could not be
stored in that specific folder.
Any
24 matches
Mail list logo
