Re[2]: Activation Limit Exceeded with Voyager

2006-10-16 Thread Vili
Hello Krzysztof, That means that the same key was used to activate Voyager 5(?) Yes. times... It can be an _indication_ of software piracy. I know It's probably reason to make this limitation. Contact Ritlabs and explain the situation asking to extend the activation number... Hmmm

Re: Activation Limit Exceeded with Voyager

2006-10-16 Thread Krzysztof Kudlacik
On 2006-10-15 (19:57), you wrote: What is uncomfortable in it? Necessity to make a plenty of manual intervetions - first: user must send a message with description, next RITs must evaluate this, next RITs must reset 'counter' per user to offer next activation. More: RITs must have

Re: Activation Limit Exceeded with Voyager

2006-10-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Krzysztof, On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:38:48 +0200 GMT (16/10/2006, 22:38 +0700 GMT), Krzysztof Kudlacik wrote: What is uncomfortable in it? KK Necessity to make a plenty of manual intervetions - first: user must send [...] I think I'm with Vili on this one. A limitation makes sense.

Re[2]: Activation Limit Exceeded with Voyager

2006-10-16 Thread Vili
Hello Krzysztof, What is uncomfortable in it? Necessity to make a plenty of manual intervetions - first: user must send a message with description, next RITs must evaluate this, next RITs must reset 'counter' per user to offer next activation. More: RITs must have very detailed

Re[2]: Activation Limit Exceeded with Voyager

2006-10-16 Thread Vili
Hello Thomas, What is uncomfortable in it? KK Necessity to make a plenty of manual intervetions - first: user must send [...] I think I'm with Vili on this one. A limitation makes sense. The question is whether 5 is enough. A registered user of TB Pro can use Voyager on five USB sticks.

Re: Activation Limit Exceeded with Voyager

2006-10-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Vili, On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:43:26 -0400 GMT (16/10/2006, 23:43 +0700 GMT), Vili wrote: V If it adds something to the statistics: no Hungarian user ever V reported to me that they used up the 5 licenses... Not even small V companies with 1-user license purchased... That's

Re: Activation Limit Exceeded with Voyager

2006-10-16 Thread Krzysztof Kudlacik
On 2006-10-16 (17:51), you wrote: A limitation makes sense. No doubt, it makes sens. I don't deny it. I only suggest two ponits: a. users of Voyager should be warned about the limitation before they download software; b. RITs sould provide some explicit and user-friendy procedure

Re: Activation Limit Exceeded with Voyager

2006-10-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Krzysztof, On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:23:10 +0200 GMT (17/10/2006, 00:23 +0700 GMT), Krzysztof Kudlacik wrote: A limitation makes sense. KK No doubt, it makes sens. I don't deny it. I only suggest two ponits: KK a. users of Voyager should be warned about the limitation before they KK

Re[2]: Activation Limit Exceeded with Voyager

2006-10-16 Thread Vili
Hello Thomas, A limitation makes sense. KK No doubt, it makes sens. I don't deny it. I only suggest two ponits: KK a. users of Voyager should be warned about the limitation before they KK download software; I agree, I myself wasn't aware of this limitation until it came up in this

Re: Activation Limit Exceeded with Voyager

2006-10-16 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Peter, on Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:03:29 +0200GMT, you wrote: PH This is not a solution for Ritlabs, but a solution for the user: PH I use Voyager on a virtual drive. Software that provides encrypted virtual PH discs are for example Ritlabs Thebat Private Disk or Truecrypt. PH Now I'm going to

Re: Mod: Cut mark

2006-10-16 Thread Charlie Kroeger
Roelof Otten wrote: Hallo Charlie, On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:49:46 -0500GMT (14-10-2006, 0:49 +0200, where I live) ' Roelof what does it mean, the clever ASCII fish? -- C.K Current ALPHA is 3.86.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information:

Re: Mod: Cut mark

2006-10-16 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Charlie, On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:42:10 -0500GMT (16-10-2006, 20:42 , where I live), you wrote: CK ' CK Roelof what does it mean, the clever ASCII fish? It's supposed to be a trout. The origins are lost in the lowest dungeons of the cyberworld, but you can consider yourself to be hit

Re: Activation Limit Exceeded with Voyager

2006-10-16 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Peter, on Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:03:47 +0200GMT, you wrote: PM AFAIK, Voyager depends on the volume-ID of the particular drive. If it's PM different from the previous one, a new activation is required. PH Correct. But the VolId does not change when mounting the virtual disc, no PH matter which

Re[4]: Activation Limit Exceeded with Voyager

2006-10-16 Thread Vili
Hello Peter, V You have used up your 5 chances. It is also uncomfortable for Ritlabs. V But if you know a better way to handle users who activates Voyager V more than 5 times, please explain that. I dont... This is not a solution for Ritlabs, but a solution for the user: I use Voyager on

Re: Activation Limit Exceeded with Voyager

2006-10-16 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Vili, Monday, October 16, 2006, 1:22:23 PM, you wrote: I dont get it... If it is a virtual drive, a software must be installed on the host PC, right? But then you have to carry/install the VD software into all PCs you are using, and install prior Voyager... right? Portable Freeware

Re: Activation Limit Exceeded with Voyager

2006-10-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter, On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:39:38 +0200 GMT (17/10/2006, 04:39 +0700 GMT), Peter Hampf wrote: PH You can carry the VD software on the USB stick as well as the image. You PH call it from there and mount the virtual drive. That's it. PH The only drawback is that you usually need admin