Re: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Rimvydas Zilinskas
Paul Van Noord wrote: > AS> A little cheap for a retort, don't you think? > No. Rude, foul-mouthed posts accomplish nothing and deserve a response > that might get the attention of the perpetrator. Sorry to dissapoint you, but the answer was not rude att all. It was reality. And I agree with Vil

Re: 4.0.24.8

2008-05-14 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Thursday, May 15, 2008, NetVicious wrote: >> If we created QTs with an older version (<4.0.24) and we type the >> %QT[Ctrl+Space] command it will activate the QT, but if we use this >> activation with a new QT we should get a window asking for the QT we >> want to use. >> Is

Re[4]: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Bob Riley
Hi Vilius, Wednesday, May 14, 2008, 1:23:00 AM, you wrote: > Oh really? I reported the IMAP bugs on the bugtracker and on this lists. See: > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6016 > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6017 > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6019 > other serious bu

Re[2]: 4.0.24.8

2008-05-14 Thread NetVicious
lunes, 12 may 2008 at 23:30, it seems you wrote: > sábado, 10 may 2008 at 21:22, it seems you wrote: > A member of the Spanish TBUDL said on the list it seems there is a bug > on the QT code. > If we created QTs with an older version (<4.0.24) and we type the > %QT[Ctrl+Space] command it

Re[3]: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi Paul, PVN> We are here to help. I have never seen helpfulness in rude & PVN> vulgar language. Fine, I appreciate that. (Both of it, in case you're wondering. ;-) ) PVN> I didn't quarrel with the content. It was the delivery. Ok, let's leave it at that, shall we? -- MfG, Alto

Re[3]: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Paul, Thank you for introducing a degree of reason into a discussion which will by its very nature, get us absolutely nowhere! I have found Ritlabs most co-operative when I reported problems over many years. That there are problems over many years is part of the real world of software developm

Re[3]: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Goncalo Farias
In reply to : AS>> Don't forget that neither of us is here to please RIT, and that AS>> does (if not, it ought to) include you. This is not a fanclub. PVN> We are here to help. I have never seen helpfulness in rude & PVN> vulgar language. We are here to provide feedback, either good or

Re[2]: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Goncalo Farias
In reply to : MDP> So do I. FYI, Vitalie is no longer a member here. Life is too short, MDP> so let's discuss it no further. ;-) Hmmm... using the approach that he pointed out in that mid: ? :P -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias In the country of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. _

Re: 4.0.24.10

2008-05-14 Thread Rick
> Hello Tbbeta, >http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb402410.rar > [-] Fixed a bug in AuthorityKeyIdentifier certificate extension > handling that might cause "Root certificate not found" error during TLS There was an irritation "bug": if you closed the bat with a folder hig

Re: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Rick
AS>> I couldn't agree more with him. RIT has let down users of TheBat big AS>> time, and no amount of unquestioning applauding by "RIT-yes-men" will AS>> be able to cover this. > Maybe you and he can start your own forum. Spelling Lesson: D-E-A-D H-O-R-S-E although that is just a private opinio

Re: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Eddie Castelli
Dear Rimvydas, -->> Montag, 12. Mai 2008, 17:54:50: > I don't know whats so funny with that. Agreed! > The Bat! has the bugs in there I paid the money for it and naturally > I want them fixed. Look at it from the positive side. - You buy a product 'X' with 'no bug' for 'XY $'. - No

Re[2]: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Paul Van Noord
5/14/2008 11:19 AM Hi Alto, On 5/14/2008 Alto Speckhardt wrote: AS> Hi Paul, >> Maybe you and he can start your own forum. AS> Don't forget that neither of us is here to please RIT, and that does AS> (if not, it ought to) include you. This is not a fanclub. We are here to help. I have never

Re: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Vilius, @14-May-2008, 18:02 +0300 (14-May 16:02 here) Vilius Šumskas [V] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: ... >> AS> be able to cover this. >> >> Maybe you and he can start your own forum. V> I think this is not for you to decide. My message was to RitLabs, .. Then it should be sent to RIT

Re: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi Paul, > Maybe you and he can start your own forum. Don't forget that neither of us is here to please RIT, and that does (if not, it ought to) include you. This is not a fanclub. We are here solely because RIT failed to live up to its promises and does not show any indications on changing this

RE: Re[2]: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Vilius Šumskas
> AS> I couldn't agree more with him. RIT has let down users of TheBat > big > AS> time, and no amount of unquestioning applauding by "RIT-yes-men" > will > AS> be able to cover this. > > Maybe you and he can start your own forum. I think this is not for you to decide. My message was to RitLabs,

Mod: Personal Attack (was: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders)

2008-05-14 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Paul, On Wed, 14 May 2008 10:44:32 -0400GMT (14-5-2008, 16:44, where I live), you wrote: PVN> Maybe you and he can start your own forum. Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this re

Re[2]: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Paul Van Noord
5/14/2008 10:40 AM Hi Alto, On 5/14/2008 Alto Speckhardt wrote: AS> A little cheap for a retort, don't you think? No. Rude, foul-mouthed posts accomplish nothing and deserve a response that might get the attention of the perpetrator. AS> Every single point Vilius made in his post is backed by

Re: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi Paul, > Do yourself, the list and Ritlabs a favor and find another forum to > lurk in. A little cheap for a retort, don't you think? Every single point Vilius made in his post is backed by fact and so is every bit of frustration that may be read both in and between the lines. I couldn't agr

Re[4]: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Paul Van Noord
5/14/2008 10:08 AM Hi Vilius, On 5/14/2008 Vilius Šumskas wrote: VŠ> I VŠ> don't use TB! Anymore, Congratulations! VŠ> but I'll just stay around and see where VŠ> this joke TB! - IMAP story will end. Do yourself, the list and Ritlabs a favor and find another forum to lurk in. - -- Paul Vo

Re[2]: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Paul Van Noord
5/14/2008 10:15 AM Hi Marck, On 5/14/2008 Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP> So do I. FYI, Vitalie is no longer a member here. Life is too short, MDP> so let's discuss it no further. ;-) Thank You Very Much! - -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.3.99.4 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 No IMAP OTFE

Re: 4.0.24.10

2008-05-14 Thread Jon Polish
On Wednesday, May 14, 2008, 3:43:07 AM, Volker Ahrendt wrote: VA> [Reply to: »Maxim Masiutin« · 2008-05-14 · 08:38 h (CET)] VA> Moin, Maxim! >>http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb402410.rar VA> Up & running! >> [-] Fixed a bug in AuthorityKeyIdentifier certificate extensi

Error in Message Count of Virtual Subfolders

2008-05-14 Thread Jens Franik
Guten Tag   The Bat! Beta, maybe it is a update/refresh Problem, i get strange Message Count in Virutal Subfolders, which show up filtered Content of Main Folder. Anlagen: 1) 20080514-MsgCount.jpg (26827 Byte, IrfanView JPG File) -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:[EMAIL

Re: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi Bob, > I don't think that quick, "smart-a__" criticisms of Rit Labs help > anyone. [...] It would be better to go on a long walk in the woods > or something. Do you think that would get us working IMAP? Heaven knows we've tried everything else. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Alto Speckhardt mail

Re: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi, > it ain't ritlabs that needs it. rather, the users need it. ... and does RIT need users? > and, management being a SERVICE, question is - who is ready to pay for it? I certainly would. What do I care whether TheBat costs 30 or 50 E, but I want apropriate value for it. I haven't seen such

Re: 4.0.24.10

2008-05-14 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »Maxim Masiutin« · 2008-05-14 · 08:38 h (CET)] Moin, Maxim! >http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb402410.rar Up & running! > [-] Fixed a bug in AuthorityKeyIdentifier certificate extension > handling that might cause "Root certificate not found" error during TLS

Re: 4.0.24.10

2008-05-14 Thread Jens Franik
am Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2008 um 08:38 schrieb Maxim Masiutin: >http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb402410.rar up+running -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.0.24.10 Windows 2000 5.0

Re: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Jens Franik
am Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2008 um 09:42 schrieb Marck D Pearlstone: > So do I. FYI, Vitalie is no longer a member here. Life is too short, > so let's discuss it no further. ;-) I already decided not to continue the Thread after my post. Life is too short, and i am willing to survive here ;-) -- Mit

Re: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Jens, @14-May-2008, 09:38 +0200 (14-May 08:38 here) Jens Franik [JF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Bob: >> I don't think that quick, "smart-a__" criticisms of Rit Labs help >> anyone. ... JF> So do I. ... So do I. FYI, Vitalie is no longer a member here. Life is too short, so let's dis

Re: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Jens Franik
am Dienstag, 13. Mai 2008 um 22:51 schrieb Bob Riley: > I don't think that quick, "smart-a__" criticisms of Rit Labs help > anyone. It is an unconstructive way of dealing with your own > frustrations, I believe. It would be better to go on a long walk in > the woods or something. So do I. Su

RE: Re[2]: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders

2008-05-14 Thread Vilius Šumskas
> Hi Vilius, > > Tuesday, May 13, 2008, 11:20:43 AM, you wrote: > > > Tuesday, May 13, 2008, 12:16:07 AM, you wrote: > > >> Vilius Šumskas wrote: > >>> I'm wondering where their management is looking? > >> yikes! what's that? > > >>> Do they even have any? > >>> > >> i concur to this question.