Re: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Dwight, Thursday, April 9, 2009, 11:53:10 PM, you wrote: DAC Reminds me of a DAC kid who doesn't want to go to bed, so keeps thinking of excuses. DAC Except avoidance is not of bed but of tackling the real problems. Oh, you're talking about Obamatactics! But isn't that OT? -- Best

Re: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »Jens Franik« · 2009-04-09 · 20:29 h (CET)] Moin, Jens! - Choose HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!\RightAlignFolderCounters - Set value to 1 Put it in the Wiki :-) You are a hacker ;-) No, not really. See mid:1541882940.20080209093...@thebat.net. Wolfgang S. is the

Re: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Ethan J. Mings
Given the diverse response to the number of attachments column, can we move on? The point has been made. Jerry -- Ethan J. Mings Principal, The Desk Consulting Group Inc., Oakville, Ontario, Canada. e-mail: je...@thedesk.ca Web: http://www.thedesk.ca Phone: 905-825-9938 or 1-877-763-7776

Re: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Martin Schoch
Hi Ethan On Friday, April 10, 2009 1:30:16 PM you wrote: Given the diverse response to the number of attachments column, can we move on? The point has been made. Yes, I think so. -- Best regards, Martin dagob...@yahoo.com TheBat! 4.1.11.12 Pro (no OTFE) on Windows XP 5.1 2600

Re[2]: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Kertész Vilmos
V I think, this is a totally useless new source of problems (bugs)... V Come on, solve the real issues and leave the cosmetic changes. Dont V even touch them for a half a year. These kind of stuff will not V bring revenue, nor rebuild the respect of TB. There are MANY bugs V that affect the

Re: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Martin Schoch
Hi Kertész On Friday, April 10, 2009 2:11:05 PM you wrote: V I think, this is a totally useless new source of problems (bugs)... V Come on, solve the real issues and leave the cosmetic changes. Dont V even touch them for a half a year. These kind of stuff will not V bring revenue, nor

Re: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Thursday, April 9, 2009, Vili wrote: What is useful in it? How often you use it to gather some extra information by knowing the number of attachments? for me it is useful when expecting or finding a message, where i know what numbers message approximately consists. This could be

RE: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Vilius Šumskas
This IS a real problem, people cannot send mails if they dont know the workaround. It would be USEFUL if this problem would be fixed instead of cosmetic changes. Of course real problems have priority - but cosmetic bugs have to be solved as well. Do you buy a software which is ugly

Re: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Vilius, Friday, April 10, 2009, 2:53:03 PM, you wrote: VŠ Real world users doesn't care about ugly interface. They do their work and VŠ go home. On the contrary. Most prefer nice looking inferior software. And as if that was not enough: they go home without doing their work! :-) --

Re: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Vili
Common  sense.  Which  is  less  and  less  currently. If a client can download email, useful. If a client has a bug in the SMTP auth window, useless. Check it: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7523 This IS a real problem, people cannot send mails if they dont know the workaround.  It

Re: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Martin Schoch
Hi Vilius On Friday, April 10, 2009 2:53:03 PM you wrote: Of course real problems have priority - but cosmetic bugs have to be solved as well. Do you buy a software which is ugly because of a bad and buggy layout? The real world is not digital :-) Real world users doesn't care about ugly

RE: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Vilius Šumskas
Oh yes I see, you are using Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 ;-) At least is has real IMAP support. -- Vilius Current beta is 4.1.11.12 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Friday, April 10, 2009, 16:54:27, Vilius Šumskas wrote: At least is has real IMAP support. It does? I'd really like to see this alternate reality Outlook that has supposedly better IMAP support than The Bat - at my workplace, we tried all versions of Outlook from 2000 to 2007 SP2 with little

Re: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Raymund Tump
Hi Vili! Dont forget, this new stuff was introduced BEFORE bugs were solved. Caused only troubles, needs to spend more energy on solving problems that would not have been. I work as a QA guy and as much as I can tell the fact that something was done instead of fixing a bug, doesn't mean the

Re: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Ethan J. Mings
Amen. Can the moderator please kill this thread ? Enough! Jerry -- Ethan J. Mings Principal, The Desk Consulting Group Inc., Oakville, Ontario, Canada. e-mail: je...@thedesk.ca Web: http://www.thedesk.ca Phone: 905-825-9938 or 1-877-763-7776 -Original Message- From: Raymund

Re: 4.1.11.12

2009-04-10 Thread Thomas Martin
Hello Sebastian, on Friday, 10. April 2009, at 18:44:38 [GMT +0200] you wrote regarding 4.1.11.12: [*] Lots of changes in the graphics interface: glyphs for refresh and view messaging history with... updated; small icon for attach files fixed in editor menu and toolbar; text align

Re: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Ethan J Mings
Hello Martin, Friday, April 10, 2009, 10:47:00 AM, you wrote: Oh yes I see, you are using Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 ;-) And the shots continue. Can the moderator please put an end to this. Maybe the folks with the concerns can take it to another space. I got the point. The point has

Re: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Jens Franik
Freitag, 10. April 2009 at 11:00, Volker Ahrendt wrote: Wolfgang S. is the keyword here. You know, Jens? ;-) --- The Bat! --- Die Nachricht mit der ID 1541882940.20080209093...@thebat.net konnte nicht gefunden werden. Wollen Sie in anderen

Re: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Jens Franik
Freitag, 10. April 2009 at 14:11, Kertész Vilmos wrote: I always feel that we should add REAL users to the betalist to refresh the blood. I am real and i talk for my Customers as well. I meet with them on a daily basis, Hopefully i will not meet all my Customers daily :-) But i see some of

Re: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Jens Franik
Freitag, 10. April 2009 at 15:43, Mark Partous wrote: On the contrary. Most prefer nice looking inferior software. Thats only a suggestion, i checked it out and the Users selected the Software which fits best their needs and is working fast and save. They dropped fancy software and took the

Re: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Jens Franik
Freitag, 10. April 2009 at 18:28, Raymund Tump wrote: Could someone please mark it as a dead horse? +1 -- With kind Regards Jens Franik mailto:je...@gmx.de Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.1.11.12 mit AntiSpamSniper 3.2.0.1 und Gaijin XMP Makro Plugin

Re: 4.1.11.12

2009-04-10 Thread Jens Franik
Freitag, 10. April 2009 at 18:42, Sebastian Murawski wrote: http://www.artgorbunov.ru/portfolio/thebat/ will be implemented? If this is the Future Design of The Bat! i will leave as soon the first of this comes to me as a Beta... Only the Color-Tags if i saw this correctly are useful. --

Re: Number of attachments

2009-04-10 Thread Hendrik Oesterlin
Jens Franik wrote on 11/04/2009 at 06:46:34 +1100 subject Number of attachments : Freitag, 10. April 2009 at 11:00, Volker Ahrendt wrote: Wolfgang S. is the keyword here. You know, Jens? ;-) --- The Bat! --- Die Nachricht mit der ID

4.1.11.13

2009-04-10 Thread Maxim Masiutin
The Bat! 4.1.11.13 is available at http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb43.rar What's new in 4.1.11.13 since 4.1.11.12: [-] (#0007556) (Beta) the %DELAY settings were ignored in automatically generated messages [*] More convenient moving focus on Shift+Tab in the message

Re: 4.1.11.13 (UR)

2009-04-10 Thread Bob Riley
Hi Maxim, Friday, April 10, 2009, 4:02:44 PM, you wrote: The Bat! 4.1.11.13 is available at http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb43.rar What's new in 4.1.11.13 since 4.1.11.12: [-] (#0007556) (Beta) the %DELAY settings were ignored in automatically generated messages