Re: The Bat! v2.11 Beta/8 is now available

On 27-05-2004 at 11:11:08 (GMT +0200) (which was 10:11 where I live) MaXxX wrote regarding the subject of "The Bat! v2.11 Beta/8 is now available" Using: N/A Hello MaXxX, > I'd like to mention that it's hard to "chat" when hardly anyone I know > has the mail checking interval set to anything less

Re: beta/16

ere would that plugin be to use this feature? -- Manfred Ell -- _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Beta: 1.54 beta/15 Wish List : http://wish.thebat.dutaint.com

HTML: was 1.54 Beta/9

On 19-09-2001 at 14:48:39 (GMT +0300) (which was 12:48 where I live) Stefan Tanurkov wrote regarding the subject of "1.54 Beta/9" Using: The Bat! (v1.54 Beta/9) Hello Stefan, ST> [-] Floating tables in HTML viewer should be viewed correctly now. ST> [-] Other HTML viewer bugs Look how the attac

known filter bug

If I turn on the new Known filter and check the option to continue processing other filters, the other filters don't get processed. Regards -- Manfred ___ [ TheBat 1.54 Beta/8 (FE1905D5), Windows 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pa

Re: Downloading Messages-feature request

On 30-07-2001 at 19:17:56 (GMT +0800) (which was 12:17 where I live) Thomas F wrote regarding the subject of "Downloading Messages-feature request" Using: The Bat! (v1.54 Beta/4) Personal Hello Thomas, TF> If the message is bigger than xxx KB, download the header only, and TF> *leave the message

Re: access violation using GnuPG (was : 1.53 RC/2)

On 08-06-2001 at 09:02:51 GMT GMT (which was 10:02 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding the subject of "access violation using GnuPG (was : 1.53 RC/2)" Using: www.webmail.nl.demon.net Hello rob, > using the latest RC/2 and GnuPG 1.0.6 (running NT4 SP5) i now get : > "Access violatio

Re: Please Please Fix This Bug !!

On 05-06-2001 at 10:45:08 GMT -0700 (which was 18:45 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote regarding the subject of "Please Please Fix This Bug !!" Using: Ritlabs SecureBat! (v1.53/iKey1000) D916F-9A79F Hello Nick, > We Users are having to suffer through a most annoying, embarrassing and > potential

Re: Opening folder view

On 20-05-2001 at 18:27:14 GMT +0800 (which was 11:27 where I live) Thomas wrote regarding the subject of "Opening folder view" Using: The Bat! (v1.53 Beta/8) Personal Hello Thomas, T> I would appreciate it if it could be changed back (in the next beta) T> to the former behaviour, as many people

Re: If you sent as many bugreports as I did...

On 12-05-2001 at 18:03:10 GMT +0200 (which was 17:03 where I live) MaXxX wrote regarding the subject of "If you sent as many bugreports as I did..." Using: The Bat! (v1.53 Beta/3) Educational Hello MaXxX, M> So much for my sarcasm. Looks like my bitching got noticed in the long run, M> because

Re: DAMN. Bugfixes or new features!? Now which is it!?

On 28-04-2001 at 23:16:43 GMT +0200 (which was 22:16 where I live) MaXxX wrote regarding the subject of "DAMN. Bugfixes or new features!? Now which is it!?" Using: The Bat! (v1.49c) Educational Hello MaXxX, M> Max and Stef are constantly adding new features, which many of us could live M> with

Re: beta/11 with GnuPG

On 25-04-2001 at 11:00:34 GMT -0700 (which was 19:00 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote regarding the subject of "beta/11 with GnuPG" Using: The Bat! (v1.52 Beta/11) Personal Hello Nick, NA> Are you able to load GnuPGTray, or are you receiving the error message NA> just in loading? If you can loa

Re: beta/11 with GnuPG

On 25-04-2001 at 09:45:29 GMT -0700 (which was 17:45 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote regarding the subject of "beta/11 with GnuPG" Using: The Bat! (v1.52 Beta/11) Personal Hello Nick, NA> The Win32 Binary 1.0.4-1.Zip available here: NA> http://www.gnupg.org/download.html NA> is simply extrac

Re: beta/11 with GnuPG

On 25-04-2001 at 16:18:27 GMT -0700 (which was 0:18 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote regarding the subject of "beta/11 with GnuPG" Using: The Bat! (v1.52 Beta/11) Personal Hello Nick, NA> It's really a simple looking Options file Manfred, so I thought I'd just NA> include it here: NA> default-

Re: GnuPG Installation File for Windows Users

On 22-04-2001 at 13:12:27 GMT -0700 (which was 21:12 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote regarding the subject of "GnuPG Installation File for Windows Users" Using: The Bat! (v1.52 Beta/11) Personal Hello Nick, NA> No, that bug has been around for quite some time. Allie or Marck would be NA> the

Re: GnuPG Installation File for Windows Users

On 22-04-2001 at 12:45:08 GMT -0700 (which was 20:45 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote regarding the subject of "GnuPG Installation File for Windows Users" Using: The Bat! (v1.52 Beta/11) Personal Hello Nick, NA> Manfred, I cannot recall ever writing to you about that. What problems are NA> you

Re: Bug with displaying numbers of msgs [another bug]

On 02-03-2001 at 14:10:43 GMT +0100 (which was 13:10 where I live) Xavier Antoviaque wrote regarding the subject of "Bug with displaying numbers of msgs [another bug]" Using: The Bat! (v1.51) Educational Hello Xavier, XA> I have also noted a bug, very similar to yours. When you have a XA

Re: 1.49d and 1.49e

On 31-01-2001 at 21:34:34 GMT +0100 (which was 20:34 where I live) Wolfgang Kynast wrote regarding the subject of "1.49d and 1.49e" Using: The Bat! (v1.49) Hello Wolfgang, WK> I would like to apologize for writing this under the moderators hat. WK> I should have made clear that this is my very p

Re: unacceptable cookies

On 31-01-2001 at 18:55:57 GMT +0100 (which was 17:55 where I live) MaXxX wrote regarding the subject of "unacceptable cookies" Using: The Bat! (v1.49c) Educational Hello MaXxX, M> Pardon my intrusion, but my cookie did NOT read "f**king beats j**king off", M> did it? M> The words "intercourse" a

Re: 1.49b

On 10-01-2001 at 23:06:28GMT +0200 (which was 21:06 where I live) Maxim Masiutin wrote regarding the subject of "1.49b" Hello Maxim, Maxim> It fixes user list loading in client mode of The Bat! Networking and Maxim> saving of S/MIME settings. More fixes coming soon. ^

Re: (No Subject)

On 08-01-2001 at 22:50:55GMT + (which was 22:50 where I live) Manfred Ell wrote regarding the subject of "(No Subject)" Hello Manfred, Manfred> update [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry folks, This should have gone to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards

(No Subject)

update [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE: To Unsubscribe

Re: Manual Backup Improvements

On 05-01-2001 at 16:39:44GMT +0100 (which was 15:39 where I live) Kari Jakobi wrote regarding the subject of "Manual Backup Improvements" Hello Kari, Kari> The way I designed it will execute the Backup everytime TB Kari> is closed *automagically* without you even noticing anything Kari> has cha

Re: The Bat! - bug report - My bat does not fly

On 08-01-2001 at 14:46:35GMT + (which was 14:46 where I live) David Elliott wrote regarding the subject of "The Bat! - bug report - My bat does not fly" Hello David, David> I have got the 'Icon Animation' on as well as 'Minimise to Tray'. The main David> icon is flying (and so is the icon

Re: German helpfile update

On 08-01-2001 at 13:24:29GMT +0100 (which was 12:24 where I live) Dieter Hummel wrote regarding the subject of "German helpfile update" Hello Dieter, Dieter> to whom it concerns (e.g. German listmembers): Dieter> update of German helpfile covers: Dieter> - Backup Dieter> - Restore Dieter> - S

Re: NOSIGNCOMPLETE in v1.49

On 06-01-2001 at 12:38:33GMT -0200 (which was 14:38 where I live) Ulrich Peters wrote regarding the subject of "NOSIGNCOMPLETE in v1.49" Hello Ulrich, Ulrich> By the way, the S/MIME preferences (under Options, S/SMIME) are still Ulrich> no kept between sessions. Confirmed and most annoying. R

Re: Printing bug in 1.49?

On 06-01-2001 at 21:47:57GMT -0500 (which was 2:47 where I live) Sashka wrote regarding the subject of "Printing bug in 1.49?" Hello Sashka, CD>> when I print mail in 1.49 the contents of the "To" and "From" fields CD>> aren't being printed, only the brackets. Sashka> printed everything fi

Re: 1.49 release is here AND AGAIN NOT EVEN A BEEP FROM RITLABS!!

On 05-01-2001 at 00:02:42GMT +0100 (which was 23:02 where I live) Florian Effenberger wrote regarding the subject of "1.49 release is here AND AGAIN NOT EVEN A BEEP FROM RITLABS!!" Hello Florian, >> So did I and received sufficient informations... Joining the list is >> open for everyone. Flo

Re: Anyone already done this?..

On 05-01-2001 at 21:51:39GMT + (which was 21:51 where I live) Marck D. Pearlstone wrote regarding the subject of "Anyone already done this?.." Hello Marck, Marck> Sorry - been AWOL overnight and just catching up. I will try to Marck> do something with this over the weekend. Sounds like a

Re: Difficult to Learn?

On 04-01-2001 at 13:40:14GMT -0800 (which was 21:40 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote regarding the subject of "Difficult to Learn?" Hello Nick, Nick> It might behoove RITLabs to start paying attention to these prospective TB! Nick> Users. I realize Stefan and the others read these Lists and ar

Re: The Bat! - bug report

On 04-01-2001 at 15:36:27GMT -0600 (which was 21:36 where I live) Nick Danger wrote regarding the subject of "The Bat! - bug report" Hello Nick, A>> I use the following macro in one of my address book groups reply A>> template: %ABtoHANDLE="%ABtoFIRSTNAME" A>> I noted just now that no nam

Re: feature request - find source message

On 04-01-2001 at 20:35:26GMT + (which was 20:35 where I live) Chris Wilson wrote regarding the subject of "feature request - find source message" Hello Chris, Chris> Whilst seeing Ming-Li point of view I also see yours, too. I agree it Chris> would be slow, but it would be a lot quicker tha

Re: The Bat! - suggestions

On 04-01-2001 at 20:43:21GMT +0100 (which was 19:43 where I live) MaXxX wrote regarding the subject of "The Bat! - suggestions" Hello MaXxX, MaXxX> I meant a simple telling the testers what was MaXxX> added and what was touched: "New features: backup option; modified pieces of MaXxX> code: addi

Re: Anyone already done this?..

On 04-01-2001 at 20:39:00GMT +0100 (which was 19:39 where I live) Arjan Vergeer wrote regarding the subject of "Anyone already done this?.." Hello Arjan, Arjan> Till now.. definitely! I've done some tests and your 'filter' succeed Arjan> the test very well! Thanks for letting me know. I sugge

Re: 1.49 Beta/2

On 04-01-2001 at 06:30:48GMT -0500 (which was 11:30 where I live) A. Curtis Martin wrote regarding the subject of "1.49 Beta/2" Hello A., A.> Since I've been using TB! (since March 1999), only a few macros have A.> been added to the Macro options lists in the template editor. One might wonder

Re: Anyone already done this?..

On 04-01-2001 at 10:49:48GMT + (which was 10:49 where I live) Graham Foster wrote regarding the subject of "Anyone already done this?.." Hello Graham, Graham> Hello tbbeta Graham> In the Kill Filters have just discovered the 'Load Signal Strings Graham> from file' option. Graham> So

Re: Bug in 1.49b2

On 04-01-2001 at 01:15:43GMT +0100 (which was 0:15 where I live) Dieter Hummel wrote regarding the subject of "Bug in 1.49b2" Hello Dieter, Dieter> BUG: macro %THEBATSERIALNUMBER returns/equals %THEBATVERSION Confirmed here also. Regards -- Manfred _

Re: Access violation with 1.48 during backup

On 16-12-2000 at 10:33:41GMT + (which was 10:33 where I live) E-mailaholics International wrote regarding the subject of "Access violation with 1.48 during backup" E-mailaholics> A bug is a programming error that causes the same effect with every E-mailaholics> installation. If it h

Re: Access violation with 1.48 during backup

On 15-12-2000 at 21:43:57GMT + (which was 21:43 where I live) E-mailaholics International wrote regarding the subject of "Access violation with 1.48 during backup" E-mailaholics> This message: 15/12/2000 21:39 GMT. E-mailaholics> Hello Manfred, E-mailaholics> A reminder of what Manfred

Re: Access violation with 1.48 during backup

On 15-12-2000 at 15:47:25GMT +0100 (which was 14:47 where I live) Marek Mikus wrote regarding the subject of "Access violation with 1.48 during backup" Marek> Hello all, Marek> Friday, December 15, 2000, Manfred Ell wrote: >> I get the following error right before

Re: Access violation with 1.48 during backup

On 15-12-2000 at 15:47:25GMT +0100 (which was 14:47 where I live) Marek Mikus wrote regarding the subject of "Access violation with 1.48 during backup" Marek> Hello all, Marek> Friday, December 15, 2000, Manfred Ell wrote: >> I get the following error right before

Re: 18 revealed bugs in 1.48 released version

On 14-12-2000 at 21:17:18GMT +0100 (which was 20:17 where I live) Marek Mikus wrote regarding the subject of "18 revealed bugs in 1.48 released version" Hello Marek, Revealing isn't it? I still stand to my statement I made in a previous thread: > IMHO the top positions of a programmers ToDo

Re: %ORG macro, (was Re: The Bat! - suggestions)

On 13-12-2000 at 14:32:36GMT + (which was 14:32 where I live) Manfred Ell wrote regarding the subject of "%ORG macro, (was Re: The Bat! - suggestions)" I have just tested this on another PC with the same negative results. So this rules out a setup problem on my system

Re: %ORG macro, (was Re: The Bat! - suggestions)

On 13-12-2000 at 15:57:45GMT +0100 (which was 14:57 where I live) Dieter Hummel wrote regarding the subject of "%ORG macro, (was Re: The Bat! - suggestions)" Dieter> Could you kindly move the ORG at the end of your macro list and see if Dieter> it works. I always put such kinda macros at the

Re: %ORG macro, (was Re: The Bat! - suggestions)

On 13-12-2000 at 14:53:06GMT +0100 (which was 13:53 where I live) Thomas Speer wrote regarding the subject of "%ORG macro, (was Re: The Bat! - suggestions)" Hello Thomas, There is something else weird here: In the identity tab of the folder properties I cannot set the organization to blank.

Re: %ORG macro

On 13-12-2000 at 15:18:45GMT +0100 (which was 14:18 where I live) Dieter Hummel wrote regarding the subject of "%ORG macro" Dieter> Which means, there's no need to clear the content by using Dieter> 'ORG=""' prior to 'ORG="something goes in here"'. Try it yourself and Dieter> find it working

Re: %ORG macro, (was Re: The Bat! - suggestions)

On 13-12-2000 at 14:53:06GMT +0100 (which was 13:53 where I live) Thomas Speer wrote regarding the subject of "%ORG macro, (was Re: The Bat! - suggestions)" ME>> In my account props I have Organization defined. I then have %ORG="" in my ME>> reply filters of certain folders. If I put %ORG="" t

Re: %ORG macro

On 13-12-2000 at 07:49:30GMT -0500 (which was 12:49 where I live) A. Curtis Martin wrote regarding the subject of "%ORG macro" >>> Are you positive on this one? JF>>Yes, indeed. A.> I just confirmed this Manfred. :=) >>> I have never been able to get this working as expected. So if it rea

Re: Beta/10

On 08-12-2000 at 10:36:41GMT -0800 (which was 18:36 where I live) Rene Ertzinger wrote regarding the subject of "Beta/10" RE> A scheduler would be great to do automated backups!!! Hello Rene, This would make the backup feature complete! Normally the user only remembers to backup once disaster h

The Bat! - suggestions: Maintenance Center

uot;Select all" The same button in the Addressbook selection. Regards, Manfred Ell -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE: <mailt

The Bat! - suggestions: Maintenance Center

ctory. Regards, Manfred Ell -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double

Re: The Bat! - suggestions sent in by customers of http://www.TheBat.de

On 05-12-2000 at 20:05:59GMT +0100 (which was 19:05 where I live) Florian Effenberger wrote regarding the subject of "The Bat! - suggestions sent in by customers of http://www.TheBat.de" >> Hope you had fun translating the message of Mr. Alexander Wild FE> Sure I had, there is absolutely no

Re: Mass Mailing

On 03-12-2000 at 23:21:31GMT +0400 (which was 19:21 where I live) Assad Toorab wrote regarding the subject of "Mass Mailing" AT> Hello Manfred, AT> On 03 December 2000, Manfred Ell wrote and made these points on the AT> subject of "Mass Mailing": ME>> Ho

Re: beta/9

ot; menu MM> I can't find this menu item in AB :-( Hello Marek, I've been looking for it also! Regards -- Manfred Ell using TheBat 1.48 Beta/9 on Windows 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1, RC 1.1 "Keep your dirty feelings deep inside" -Floyd --

Re: Print Bug?

anuk, Confirmed here also. It's not a big problem but a nonetheless. Regards -- Manfred Ell using TheBat 1.48 Beta/7 on Windows 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1, RC 1.1 -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutain

gender bug

The gender bug only appears if TheBat uses the LNG file. If you rename the file the gender is displayed OK in the address book! Regards -- Manfred Ell using TheBat 1.48 Beta/6 on Windows 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1, RC 1.1

Re: beta/6

On 12-11-2000 at 10:48:28GMT -0500 (which was 15:48 where I live) Peter Gannushkin wrote regarding the subject of " beta/6 " > Hello Maxim, > The archive contains 1.46/b4 instead of fresh version. Hello Peter, just downloaded it and it shows as beta 6. Regards -- Ma

Re: Bug with using multiple Cookies

ch was 13:44 where I > live) Manfred Ell wrote and made these points: >>> I'm having problems with using more than two %cookie macros in a >>> template where the second %cookie macro actually uses cookies from >>> the first %cookie macro's designated cookie

Re: Bug with using multiple Cookies

urtis, Cannot confirm here, everything works as expected. This was my quick-template: %COOKIE="C:\Documents and Settings\manfred\test\1.txt" %COOKIE="C:\Documents and Settings\manfred\test\2.txt" %COOKIE="C:\Documents and Settings\manfred\test\3.txt&

The Bat! - suggestions

xt in a horizontal window and using small icons instead of a vertical window with big icons. This uses up so much screen space in 800x600. Regards, Manfred Ell -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.c

Re: The Bat! - bug report - Backup

entre - it is not supposed to be there yet and the menu >> commands are left enabled by a mistake. Please excuse us for >> confusion :-) > Best, > Ulrich Hello Ulrich, Sorry, that was an oversight but nevertheless as it's here we can give first impressions. Regar

Re: Beta-RAR-Archives

d now about them. I also think Stefan should take more aktive part in this forum so we can be of better assistance in beta testing. Like: "hey, we have changed xxx, please try them about using this steps " Just MHO. Regards -- Manfred Ell using TheBat 1.48 Beta/1 on Windows 5.0 Build

The Bat! - bug report - Backup

first one cannot be selected, the second doesn't do anything Steps to reproduce the bug: Regards, Manfred Ell -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team doub

Re: Bug with exporting messages

2 messages via Tools/Export messages/Unix mailbox > everything works fine. Seems to work here. Regards -- Manfred Ell using TheBat 1.47 Halloween Edition on Windows 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1, RC 1.1 -- -- View the TBBETA archiv

Re: bug report: address book - gender-setting

tly (and we have several users with the problem) than it IS a bug. Regards -- Manfred Ell using TheBat 1.47 Beta/7 on Windows 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1, RC 1.1 -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com T

Re: bug report: address book - gender-setting

ook holds the correct RMN>> gender icon despite the blank field! > Gender Icon? Wassat? Have a look at the icons of the address book entries: males have a blue (small) icon, females red and undefined sort of grey. I mean the small person inside the icon. It could be bigger so it is

Re[2]: beta/6

most annoying. -- Manfred Ell using TheBat 1.47 Beta/6 on Windows 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1, RC 1.1 -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HE

Re[2]: [Wish] Disable all online activity

'sense' the internet connection before trying anything (as Eudora does). -- Manfred Ell using TheBat 1.47 Beta/5 on Windows 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1, RC 1.1 -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.c

Re[2]: Beta/11

Confirmed here too. -- Manfred Ell Using TheBat version 1.45 Beta/11 on Windows NT 5.0 build 2195 On Thursday, July 20, 2000, 6:45:57 PM, you wrote: > In Beta/11 the subject of a forwarded message is no longer preceded by > "Fwd:" Is this a