Hello Tony Boom & everyone else
08-Nov-2004 13:58, you wrote:
MO>> Oh, I remember the old Amiga clients Spot and Thor :-) The first a
MO>> fidonet client, the latter intended for both fidonet and email.
> Amiga on the web eh? Bet that was fast :)
Faster than yo momma! :-)
You know, its applic
Hello Marcus,
A reminder of what Marcus Ohlström typed on:
08 November 2004 at 12:54:00 GMT +0100
MO> Oh, I remember the old Amiga clients Spot and Thor :-) The first a
MO> fidonet client, the latter intended for both fidonet and email.
Amiga on the web eh? Bet that was fast :)
I still go
On Monday, November 8, 2004, 11:07, Tony Boom wrote:
> Out of all the clients I've bought, and I have a few, The Bat is
> the only one that has the option to prevent accidental deletion.
> Obviously we are now going to be flooded with dozens of posts
> naming others that have the option :)
O
Hello Roger,
A reminder of what Roger Phillips typed on:
08 November 2004 at 04:55:59 GMT +0100
RP> Given my comments here, can you give me a good and sensible reason why
RP> anybody would want to keep duplicates of a message within the same
RP> folder?
Woa, Woa Woa, ang on a mo. I'm no
Hello Tony,
Sunday, November 7, 2004, 4:17:31 PM, among other things, you wrote:
TB> Occasionally I buy software off the web, The Bat, Time & Chaos, Acronis,
TB> MailwasherPro, NOD32 and Kerio to name a few. They send me an email with
TB> all my registration details, I put it in an archive fo
Hello Tony,
Sunday, November 7, 2004, 12:51:01 PM, among other things, you wrote:
RP>> Any comments?
TB> Yes, the idea of parking a message is to protect it from exactly what your
TB> trying to do with it, deleting it!
Yes, I AM aware of the reason for parking! I was only asking about
del
On Sunday, November 7, 2004, 11:51, Tony Boom wrote:
RP>> If it is, 'as designed', then IMHO it should be changed.
> Please don't, I use it quite a lot and I like the idea of being able to
> "Idiot proof" the odd email or two, duplicate or not.
Especially since the kill duplicate procedure ha
Hello Roger,
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 14:36:31 +0200 GMT (07/11/2004, 19:36 +0700 GMT),
Roger Phillips wrote:
RP> I disagree. If you want to have a duplicate you can make one, but
RP> why would you want to STORE one?
I wouldn't know, but it would be your decision to store those
duplicates, would
Hello Tony!
On Sunday, November 7, 2004 at 3:17:31 PM you wrote:
> I put it in an archive folder, Park it and don't have to worry about
> accidentally deleting it.
> It's invariably TB! I look to first should I need them.
> Unlike a lot of people, I delete most of the mail I receive especially
Hello Dierk,
A reminder of what Dierk Haasis typed on:
07 November 2004 at 14:58:47 GMT +0100
DH> Tony may be the better one to tell, as he uses this.
Occasionally I buy software off the web, The Bat, Time & Chaos, Acronis,
MailwasherPro, NOD32 and Kerio to name a few. They send me an emai
Hello Roger!
On Sunday, November 7, 2004 at 1:36:31 PM you wrote:
> I disagree. If you want to have a duplicate you can make one, but
> why would you want to STORE one?
Well, for archival reasons? If ever I intentionally duplicate a
message I am quite sure I do want to store it, too. Other
Hello Roger,
A reminder of what Roger Phillips typed on:
07 November 2004 at 09:48:53 GMT +0100
RP> Any comments?
Yes, the idea of parking a message is to protect it from exactly what your
trying to do with it, deleting it!
RP> If it is, 'as designed', then IMHO it should be changed.
P
Hello Dierk,
Sunday, November 7, 2004, 11:02:51 AM, among other things, you wrote:
>> Any comments?
DH> I think it is intentional. I also think it is logical: When I want to
DH> lock a message (which is what "Park" does), I don't want to have it
DH> deleted regardless of a duplicate purge.
I
Hello Roger!
On Sunday, November 7, 2004 at 9:48:59 AM you wrote:
> Any comments?
I think it is intentional. I also think it is logical: When I want to
lock a message (which is what "Park" does), I don't want to have it
deleted regardless of a duplicate purge.
--
Dierk Haasis
:Dierk: Copy '
Hi All,
I have only recently noticed that the 'Kill duplicates' action ignores
any messages that are marked as 'Parked'.
My question is, does anyone know if this is intentional or if it is a
bug? 9Val?
If it is, 'as designed', then IMHO it should be changed. If one wants to
remove duplicates
15 matches
Mail list logo
