Hello Maxim,
Does not support.
Curt
Sent from my office desktop by The Bat!
Using The Bat! Version 9.1.18.6 (ALPHA) (64-bit) Windows 7 (32)
with HughesNet Gen5 Satellite Internet
Duetomajor policy disagreements, we no longer use
turnkeyinternet.net
Tuesday, May 19, 202
martes, 19 may. 2020 at 22:58, it seems you wrote:
> Hello Tbbeta,
> Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions
> introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in
> their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There
> are seven new SSE-b
Hello Maxim,
On Tue, 19 May 2020 23:58:15 +0300 GMT (20-May-20, 3:58 +0700 GMT),
Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA wrote:
> You can run The Bat! with /SHA1_BENCHMARK command-line parameter to
> figure out whether your CPU supports SHA1 acceleration instructions, for
> example:
> thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENC
Hello Maxim,
On Tue, 19 May 2020, at 23:58:15 [GMT +0300] (which was 22:58 where I
live) Maxim wrote:
> Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions
> introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in
> their processors for these instructions starting with
Hello Gunivortus,
Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 9:21:52 PM, you wrote:
> At my PC I also saw that with data blocks etc,, but considered it
> (being a rooky at that field) as unimportant and so I only took the
> first sentence.
OK, I was starting another instance of TheBat! with the 1st instance
runn
Hello Maxim,
here's mine ...
SHA1 benchmark
This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks
of 1024 bytes took 1.6372 seconds to process by SHA1 (software);
894.7346 Megabytes per second
-
--
Kind regards,
Gunivortus Goos
The Bat! Professional
Hello Maxim,
---
SHA1 benchmark
---
This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of
1024 bytes took 5.9410 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 246.5652
Megabytes per second
---
OK
Hello Christoph,
Friday, May 22, 2020, 3:14:08 AM, you wrote:
> 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 0.8513 seconds to process by
> SHA1 using CPU instructions (hardware), 1720.6420 Megabytes per
> second; 1.9198 seconds to process by software implementation, 763.0005
> Megabytes per second
Wo
Hello list!
* I wrote '[1]:
> Hello Maxim, hello List!
> * Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA wrote '[1]:
>> thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK
>> Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance.
> This is my communication laptop (which is normally running TB!). But I
> can test it on my other
Hello Maxim,
> thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK
--- SHA1 benchmark ---
This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of
1024 bytes took 1.6875 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 868.0674
Megabytes per second
---
On Tuesday, May 19, 2020, 11:58:15 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Tbbeta,
> Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions
> introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in
> their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There
> are seven new SSE-ba
May 20, 2020
Hello Maxim,
Tuesday, May 19, 2020, 4:58:15 PM, you wrote:
> Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions introduced
> on
> Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in their processors for
> these
> instructions starting with Ryzen. There are seven
Hello Maxim, hello List!
* Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA wrote '[1]:
> thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK
> Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance.
---
SHA1 benchmark
---
This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks
On Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 1:18:19 PM, Assad Baroot wrote:
> Mine is AMD Ryzen 7 3700X Processor. Technically, mine should be
> faster than yours but your cpu has a slightly lower SHA1 processed time.
Interesting, because I also have a Ryzen 7 3700X processor (3.60GHz),
and my times are fa
Hello Maxim,
On Tuesday, May 19, 2020, 9:58:15 PM, Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA wrote:
> Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions
> introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in
> their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There
> ar
Hello Assad,
Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 7:18:19 AM, you wrote:
> Mine is AMD Ryzen 7 3700X Processor. Technically, mine should be
> faster than yours but your cpu has a slightly lower SHA1 processed time.
Must be all the steroids I give it. :>)
--
Best regards,
Stuart
Hello Maxim,
Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 12:47:22 AM, you wrote:
> Your CPU is fastest amongst us. What is the exact model/make of your CPU?
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Six-Core Processor 3.49 GHz
--
Best regards,
Stuartmailto:skcu...@fastmail.fm
___
Hello Andrew,
>> This CPU does not support SHA instructions ...etc.
> That was indeed an outdated 3-rd gen i7. However others have reported
> the following output which I do not see:
At my PC I also saw that with data blocks etc,, but considered it
(being a rooky at that field) as unimportant a
per second
---
OK
---
--
Regards
Manuel
- Original Message -
From: "Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA"
To: "Manuel Ostertag"
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 23:58:15 [UTC +0300]
Subject: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleratio
Hello Gunivortus,
Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 8:37:09 PM, you wrote:
> This CPU does not support SHA instructions ...etc.
That was indeed an outdated 3-rd gen i7. However others have reported
the following output which I do not see:
> ---
> SHA1 benchmark
> ---
Hello Maxim,
>> thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK
This CPU does not support SHA instructions ...etc.
--
Kind regards,
Gunivortus Goos
The Bat! Professional 64 bit, version 9.1.18.3 (BETA)
Windows Pro 64 bit version 10, build nr. 18363
NordVPN vs. 6.27.11.0
Hi The
On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:58:15 PM you wrote:
> Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance.
---
SHA1 benchmark
---
This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes
took 5.6094 seconds to pro
Hello Maxim,
Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 6:28:15 AM, you wrote:
> thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK
Returns nothing to the stdout, tried both PowerShell and "cmd.exe".
v9.1.18, x64. Am I missing something?
--
Regards,
A
'Using TBBETA' informa
Hello,
My processor (Intel i7-5930K) does not support SHA instructions.
150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.8040 seconds to process by
SHA1 (software): 811.9780 Megabytes per second.
--
Best regards,
Petr S.
mailto:p_persh...@volny.cz
TheBat! version: 9.1.18.6 (ALPHA)
on Windows 10 bu
Megabytes per second
---
OK
---
--
Regards
Manuel
-
- Original Message -
From: "Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA"
To: "Manuel Ostertag"
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 23:58:15 [UTC +0300]
Subject: Does
Hello The,
On Tue, 19 May 2020, at 23:58:15 [GMT +0300] (which was 22:58 where I
live) Maxim wrote:
> Hello Tbbeta,
> Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions
> introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in
> their processors for these instruction
Hello Stuart,
Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 5:06:52 AM, you wrote:
> 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.0014 seconds to process by SHA1 using
> CPU instructions (hardware), 1462.7576 Megabytes per second; 2.2528 seconds to
> process by software implementation, 650.2314 Megabytes per second
Your
Hello Tbbeta,
Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions introduced
on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in their processors for
these instructions starting with Ryzen. There are seven new SSE-based
instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for
Hello Maxim,
Tuesday, May 19, 2020, 3:58:15 PM, you wrote:
> Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions introduced
> on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in their processors for
> these instructions starting with Ryzen. There are seven new SSE-based
> inst
Hello Tbbeta,
Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions introduced
on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in their processors for
these instructions starting with Ryzen. There are seven new SSE-based
instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for SHA-
30 matches
Mail list logo